Government Shutdown in Disguise? Lawyers Can't Meet Clients After TB Alert at Miami Federal Prison
The Federal Detention Center in downtown Miami is under precautionary quarantine, barring family, friends and lawyers from visiting inmates, and canceling at least one trial after a prisoner showed signs of tuberculosis.
January 22, 2019 at 03:41 PM
4 minute read
A tuberculosis scare has shut down the Federal Detention Center in downtown Miami, but attorneys are hinting the government shutdown might be the true cause.
The Southern District of Florida Blog, run by criminal defense attorney David Oscar Markus, broke the story, writing that “FDC-Miami is still shutdown due to a supposed TB scare.” It posted an email from marshals providing an update on the quarantine, after an inmate allegedly showed signs of the disease on Wednesday. No defendants are being brought to trial, attorney visits have stopped and at least one case has been canceled, according to the post.
Prison medical managers are awaiting test results to confirm a positive or negative diagnosis on the patient, a facility cook at the Federal Correctional Institution in Yazoo County, Mississippi, who recently traveled to Florida for a court appearance.
The quarantine comes amid the longest government shutdown in U.S. history, playing out in the background with reports of federal Transportation Security Administration officers, air traffic controllers and other government employees taking sick days in droves after being forced to work without pay.
|
Related story: Miami Immigration Courts Are Canceling 1,000 Cases a Week Due to Government Shutdown
But Miami marshals attributed the suspension to a precautionary quarantine at the prison, which houses 1,148 male and female inmates, according to its website.
Tuberculosis is a potentially fatal and contagious bacterial disease that typically strikes the lungs but can attack any area of the body. It's airborne and spread by coughing, sneezing and talking. But Markus suggests there might be more to the quarantine.
“The shutdown is having so many negative consequences, it's hard to measure,” he told the Daily Business Review. “Now it's taken aim at the Sixth Amendment as lawyers cannot even visit their clients. It won't be long 'till prosecutors and defenders won't be able to do their jobs, which will cause a crisis.”
The Federal Detention Center is no stranger to TB alerts, according to Markus's post, which claims this is the first time a potential infection has stopped all visitation and court activity.
According to Henry P. Bell, Criminal Justice Act representative for the Southern District of Florida, the quarantine is still in effect and he's waiting to hear whether it will continue tomorrow.
“Essentially, we've been told that because of the risk associated with the infected inmate and possibly other inmates, there's a quarantine,” he said.
Bell conceded that the timing of the quarantine has caused some people to question the reasoning behind it, but stressed that he had no reason to doubt the official line.
“I accept at face value what I'm being told,” Bell said. “These are representations being made to me by a lawyer from the Bureau of Prisons, and I believe these representations have been made to the court itself. I don't have any reason to cast dispersion or doubt on that.”
Bell received word from the Bureau of Prisons Consolidated Legal Center in South Florida, which also informed the court and members of the U.S. Attorney's Office.
The U.S. Marshals Service in South Florida would not comment on the status of the TB alert, and the Bureau of Prisons did not respond before deadline.
If the quarantine period had lasted much longer, Bell suspected defense attorneys would consider asking judges to release their clients on bond while they awaited trail. But on Tuesday afternoon, Miami marshals announced that services will return to normal on Wednesday, after the TB was not deemed infectious.
The suspension has caused serious issues for lawyers, according to Michael Caruso, federal public defender for South Florida.
“An in-person visit is the only way a lawyer can have a private conversation with his or her client,” Caruso said. “The Bureau of Prisons long has refused to set up a system where a lawyer and client can have a secure communication through either email or telephone. These types of communications are monitored by the Department of Justice and therefore are of limited value.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Attorney General Ashley Moody Targets Company in Pot Ballot Fight
DOJ Supports Appointing US Judge Backed By Trump to Review Mar-a-Lago Documents
3 minute read'Not Going to Get Away With it': 3 Arrested in South Florida Zillow Deed Scam
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC is Over'
- 2NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 3A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 4Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 5State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250