Florida Police Are Now Withholding Crime Victim Information
Since Amendment 6, a sweeping proposal that in part broadened the rights of crime victims, took effect some police agencies have stopped releasing basic information about crime victims.
January 24, 2019 at 01:28 PM
3 minute read
Barbara Petersen of the First Amendment Foundation. (AP Photo/Steve Cannon, File)
Some law enforcement agencies in Florida have begun withholding information about crime victims, including the names of people killed, due to their interpretation of a measure passed by voters last fall.
Florida voters signed off on Amendment 6, a sweeping proposal that broadened the rights of crime victims and increased the mandatory retirement age for judges. The main part of the amendment is known as Marsy's Law and similar laws have been passed by many states around the country.
Since the amendment took effect on Jan. 8 some police agencies around the state have stopped releasing basic information about crime victims.
Police in the state capital of Tallahassee, for example, provided sparse details about the victim of an apparent traffic crash in which a body was found in the middle of a neighborhood roundabout. Tampa authorities declined to provide information about two people found shot dead in a car near the Busch Gardens theme park.
In both instances, police cited a provision in the amendment to protect the victim's right “to prevent the disclosure of information or records that could be used to locate or harass the victim or the victim's family or which could disclose confidential or privileged information of the victim.”
The Tampa Bay Times reported that open government advocates say this interpretation conflicts with existing public records law.
“I understand their dilemma and I understand there's not a lot of clarity right now,” Barbara Petersen, president of the Tallahassee-based First Amendment Foundation told the newspaper. “But they cannot willfully deny access to a request for public records unless there is specific constitutional or statutory authority, and this amendment does not provide that authority.”
One of the key questions about the amendment whether the right to have information withheld is automatic or if victims have to request the protection.
The Tallahassee Democrat reported that the two main law-enforcement agencies in the state capital are responding differently to that question.
“It's a very broad protection that's been granted to victims and their families, and we're trying to make sure we honor the spirit of what people voted for,” Tallahassee Police Chief Michael DeLeo told the newspaper.
State legislators have been asked to pass a law that clears up the confusion over the amendment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/28/90/106b497d4c2abf86218e4414ada2/attorney-fees-767x633.jpg)
Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute read![As Unpredictability Rises, Gov't Law Practices Expect Trump Bump. Especially in Florida As Unpredictability Rises, Gov't Law Practices Expect Trump Bump. Especially in Florida](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/3a/bd/04f8d6ca45a49bc6f4b27abc8f32/trump-2025-767x633.jpg)
As Unpredictability Rises, Gov't Law Practices Expect Trump Bump. Especially in Florida
5 minute read![New Trouble for Allstate: National Class Action Targets Insurer New Trouble for Allstate: National Class Action Targets Insurer](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/98/ca/4dd6a947421bbc9c53aad7b8dd51/allstate-insurance-2-767x633.jpg)
![Brownstein Hyatt Opens 13th Office in Tampa With Lobbying Focus Brownstein Hyatt Opens 13th Office in Tampa With Lobbying Focus](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/4e/16/10ba62784f9f8905e4ab91a1fdd9/blake-benenson-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250