Photographer Sues Miami Pop Art Gallery Over Vintage Brigitte Bardot Photo
A federal lawsuit in Miami paints the Kfir Moyal Art Gallery Inc. as a copyright infringer for allegedly reproducing and profiting from a photo of French actress, model and activist Brigitte Bardot.
January 24, 2019 at 03:26 PM
3 minute read
Veteran Hollywood photographer Douglas Kirkland challenged a Miami pop art gallery in federal court Tuesday, claiming one of its works ripped off a photo of French actress, model and activist Brigitte Bardot.
Kirkland took the photo in 1965, according to the copyright infringement lawsuit, which points the finger at gallery owner and pop artist Kfir Moyal.
|
View the photo on page 3 of Kirkland's complaint:
The suit, filed in the Southern District of Florida, claims Moyal copied Kirkland's Bardot shot without permission, displayed it on his gallery's website and used it to make and sell products, including a table and some wall art.
Moyal and his agent Kari Guhl did not respond to a request for comment before deadline.
Kirkland, originally from Canada, achieved fame in 1961, when as a 24-year-old newbie he snapped a photo of Marilyn Monroe in an unmade bed for the cover of Look Magazine — less than a year before she died.
Kirkland has since captured the likes of actress Audrey Hepburn, U2 frontman Bono and pop artist Andy Warhol, with some even dubbing him Hollywood's favorite photographer. He has asked the court for damages, profits earned, attorney fees and costs.
|
Click here to see one of Moyal's “Starstruck” Brigitte Bardot pieces
|
'A difficult life'
The full extent of the alleged infringement is not yet clear, according to Kirkland's lawyer, Alexander C. Cohen of SRIPLAW in Boca Raton, who's working on the case with Joel B. Rothman and Ana P. Moretto.
Cohen said he's frequently contacted by photographers struggling with similar issues.
“It's hard enough to make it as an artist if no one is stealing your stuff,” Cohen said. “But imagine you create one good photograph out of every thousand that you take, and somebody just steals it instead of paying for it. It's a difficult life.”
This case is particularly egregious, in Cohen's view, as Moyal has made money from the alleged infringement.
“Sometimes people will copy our clients' photographs and use them in an advertisement or a blog, but here somebody is actually selling his work for quite a bit of money and they have no right to do that.”
It's not Moyal's first brush with copyright law.
In 2016, his gallery was hit with a similar lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida over its alleged reproduction of Monroe and Hepburn photos. In March 2017, U.S. District Judge Ursula Ungaro issued a final judgment of more than $332,000 against the gallery.
More copyright infringement stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMorgan & Morgan Sues Law Firm, Managing Partner for Violating Settlement Over Misleading Ads
3 minute readWhat Is Exhibit J? Litigators Are Watching This AI Test Case
With Lawsuits Brewing, Businesses Should Develop Policies on Generative AI
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250