Woodbridge Group Slapped With $1 Billion Penalty for Ponzi Scheme
A federal court in Miami ordered real estate developer Woodbridge Group, its 128 affiliate companies and former CEO Robert H. Shapiro to pay $1 billion in penalties and disgorgement for running a Ponzi scheme that hurt 8,400 investors, many of whom were senior citizens.
January 28, 2019 at 05:52 PM
3 minute read
U.S. District Judge Marcia G. Cooke of the Southern District of Florida hit real estate developer Woodbridge Group of Companies and former owner Robert H. Shapiro with a $1 billion penalty over a Ponzi scheme that targeted more than 8,400 retail investors.
Cooke approved the fine on Dec. 27, 2018, but it wasn't made public until Monday.
Woodbridge and its 128 sister companies have to shell out $892 million for disgorgement, repayment of ill-gotten gains, while California businessman Shapiro faces a $100 million civil penalty plus $20 million in disgorgement plus interest.
Click here to read the SEC's full complaint
Shapiro and his company, which used to be headquartered in Boca Raton, specialized in flipping luxury real estate but had defrauded investors with unregistered funds and fake real estate investments, according to the SEC.
The SEC filed an emergency action in December 2017, accusing Shapiro and his company of running a Ponzi scheme through its hundreds of in-house and external sales agents. Meanwhile, Woodbridge filed for bankruptcy after the scheme fell apart.
The SEC's complaint claimed Shapiro squirreled away more than $21 million that should have gone to investors, instead spending it on fine wine, jewelry, luxury cars and charter planes.
Many of the investors were elderly people who lost their retirement funds to the scheme.
Russell Koonin, Christine Nestor, Scott A. Lowry and David W. Baddley led the investigation for the SEC.
Shapiro's lawyer, Ryan O'Quinn of DLA Piper in Miami, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The judgment was nothing new for Adam Schwartz of Homer Bonner Jacobs in Miami, counsel to Woodbridge Group of Companies, which consented to the judgment in October 2018.
“It's part of our ongoing cooperation with the SEC,” Schwartz said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLocal Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
3 minute readGreenberg Traurig Combines Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate Groups, Anticipating Uptick in Demand
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readPlaintiffs Allege Carollo Retaliated Over Bayfront Trust Accounting Discoveries
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 2Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
- 3Trump Moves to Withdraw Applications to Halt Now-Completed Sentencing
- 4Trump's RTO Mandate May Have Some Gov't Lawyers Polishing Their Resumes
- 5A Judge Is Raising Questions About Docket Rotation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250