U.S. District Judge Marcia Cooke for the Southern District of Florida. Photo: Jill Kahn.Woodbridge Group Slapped With $1 Billion Penalty for Ponzi Scheme
A federal court in Miami ordered real estate developer Woodbridge Group, its 128 affiliate companies and former CEO Robert H. Shapiro to pay $1 billion in penalties and disgorgement for running a Ponzi scheme that hurt 8,400 investors, many of whom were senior citizens.
January 28, 2019 at 05:52 PM
3 minute read
U.S. District Judge Marcia G. Cooke of the Southern District of Florida hit real estate developer Woodbridge Group of Companies and former owner Robert H. Shapiro with a $1 billion penalty over a Ponzi scheme that targeted more than 8,400 retail investors.
Cooke approved the fine on Dec. 27, 2018, but it wasn't made public until Monday.
Woodbridge and its 128 sister companies have to shell out $892 million for disgorgement, repayment of ill-gotten gains, while California businessman Shapiro faces a $100 million civil penalty plus $20 million in disgorgement plus interest.
|
Click here to read the SEC's full complaint
Shapiro and his company, which used to be headquartered in Boca Raton, specialized in flipping luxury real estate but had defrauded investors with unregistered funds and fake real estate investments, according to the SEC.
Robert Shapiro of Woodbridge Realty of Colorado. Courtesy photo.
The SEC filed an emergency action in December 2017, accusing Shapiro and his company of running a Ponzi scheme through its hundreds of in-house and external sales agents. Meanwhile, Woodbridge filed for bankruptcy after the scheme fell apart.
The SEC's complaint claimed Shapiro squirreled away more than $21 million that should have gone to investors, instead spending it on fine wine, jewelry, luxury cars and charter planes.
Many of the investors were elderly people who lost their retirement funds to the scheme.
Russell Koonin, Christine Nestor, Scott A. Lowry and David W. Baddley led the investigation for the SEC.
Shapiro's lawyer, Ryan O'Quinn of DLA Piper in Miami, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The judgment was nothing new for Adam Schwartz of Homer Bonner Jacobs in Miami, counsel to Woodbridge Group of Companies, which consented to the judgment in October 2018.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Benworth Accused of Predatory Tactics in Foreclosure Dispute as Elderly Defendant's Health Deteriorates
4 minute read
'Get Rid of the Men': Employer Accused of Discrimination
Trending Stories
- 1Remembering Ted Olson
- 2Support Magistrates: Statutorily Significant
- 3Nelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
- 4Immunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
- 5Monday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
