Aventura Officers Settle Excessive Force Lawsuit Over Attorney's Protest Arrest
The two officers settled after a federal appeals court rejected their bids for qualified immunity.
January 30, 2019 at 02:48 PM
4 minute read
An attorney and two Aventura police officers have settled a lawsuit claiming excessive force when they arrested her during a protest against sidewalk construction tied to a disputed luxury condominium development.
Dara Clarke, who opposed the sidewalk being built in front of her house in preparation for the nearby Prive at Island Estates, signed an agreement Friday to drop her claims against Sgt. Terry Scott and Officer Joseph Craig in exchange for $200,000. The funds were paid Tuesday.
This likely is what a jury would have awarded had it sided with Clarke, although this outcome also is a “vindication” of Clarke, said her attorney, Matt Leto.
“From Ms. Clarke's point of view, this case was never only about the money,” said Leto, a partner at Hall, Lamb, Hall & Leto in Miami. “What happened to her should not have happened. The officers shouldn't have arrested her. They shouldn't have touched her. They shouldn't have physically abused her in the way that they did on that evening.”
The Aventura Police Department said Scott and Craig had no comment, and the officers' attorney, Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman partner Michael Burke in Fort Lauderdale, didn't return a request for comment by deadline.
The officers admit no guilt in the settlement.
Clarke accused the officers of “forcefully” twisting her arms behind her back, “violently” lifting her off the ground and digging their knees into her calves when they arrested her Feb. 26, 2015, despite her being calm while trying to provide them with information on why she called them, according to her amended federal complaint.
Clarke accused Scott of stomping her foot with his boot while she was wearing flip-flops and keeping it there until she was thrown in a patrol car. She said her foot, calf, shoulder, elbow and arm were injured.
Scott and Terry in legal filings disputed Clarke's claim she was calm and have argued they used minimal force.
This is one of many legal cases stemming from the twin-tower, 16-story Prive condominium that opened last year on the private eight-acre North Island, which can be reached by bridge from South Island, an enclave of single-family homes where Clarke lives.
The Prive developer was required by the city to build the sidewalk, but Clarke and some other South Island residents protested the location, saying it was being built on their properties. Clarke's complaint said she was arrested while trying to show the officers a survey on her phone as proof the sidewalk was on her property.
The lawsuit claimed the department has an unofficial “pattern and custom” of using excessive force and failing to discipline offending officers, citing at least 20 incidents from 2012 to 2017 and a separate nine incidents involving Terry and Scott.
U.S. District Judge Robert Scola granted the city's motion for summary judgment and similar motions by the Prive developer and related affiliates. He refused the release the officers from the case, and a federal appeals court agreed, concluding they lacked qualified immunity.
Clarke was arrested for disorderly conduct and later charged with criminal mischief and resisting arrest without violence but wasn't prosecuted. She was an Aventura City Commission candidate in 2018 but withdrew from the race to focus on her lawsuit.
Related stories:
Aventura Police Lack Immunity on Attorney's Excessive-Force Claim, Appeals Court Rules
Luxury Aventura Condo Opponents Ordered to Pay Developer $26 Million
Aventura Condo Developer, Opponents Reach $21.6 Million Settlement
High-End Aventura Condos Open as Lawsuit With Neighbors Lives On
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllReal Estate Trends to Watch in 2025: Restructuring, Growth, and Challenges in South Florida
3 minute read830 Brickell is Open After Two-Year Delay That Led to Winston & Strawn Pulling Lease
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250