Lawyers Focusing on Venezuela Sanctions, Potential for New Business
While some American companies are hopeful that a regime change in Venezuela will open the door for new business transactions with the country, others are scrutinizing their dealings with Venezuela's state-owned oil company PDVSA and its subsidiaries to determine their level of exposure to sanctions risks, according to international trade lawyers.
February 04, 2019 at 04:58 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
With the U.S. and E.U. countries endorsing regime change in Venezuela, international trade lawyers are looking for potential new business opportunities while checking on the latest sanctions.
In January, the U.S. announced it would impose new sanctions on Venezuela's state-owned oil company Petroleos de Venezuela SA, or PDVSA, the parent of Citgo and several other subsidiaries, as part of an effort to pressure Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro to resign.
“I will continue to use the full weight of United States economic and diplomatic power to press for the restoration of Venezuelan democracy,” President Donald Trump said in a Jan. 23 statement in which he recognized opposition leader Juan Guaido as Venezuela's interim president.
The latest sanctions, which are set to take effect April 28, added PDVSA to the banned list, which means its assets are blocked and U.S. residents are generally prohibited from dealing with the company. The sanctions would prevent Maduro's regime from benefiting from the proceeds of PDVSA's crude oil exports to the U.S. and prohibit U.S. companies from exporting goods or services to PDVSA.
Venezuela's oil revenues account for 98 percent of export earnings, according to OPEC, and the sanctions could shove the country's already fragile economy over the brink.
“Corporate clients and persons, including my neighbors, some of whom recently arrived in South Florida from Venezuela, are enthusiastic that there will finally be a change in the leadership of what is widely recognized as a failed and corrupt government in Venezuela,” said Miami lawyer Peter Quinter, a shareholder at GrayRobinson who chairs the firm's customs and international trade law group.
Business transactions between the U.S. and Venezuela have “drastically fallen over the last 10 years,” added Quinter, who said the “sooner there is a change in the government in Venezuela, the sooner the international business will return, especially for the benefit of companies located in South Florida.”
Jorge Salcedo, another Miami attorney who represents domestic and international businesses, echoed Quinter, saying his clients, who operate primarily in the aviation and energy industries, have “good hope that there's going to be a regime change very soon” so they can “start doing business in Venezuela freely.”
But if that change doesn't come, Salcedo of Salcedo Attorneys at Law predicted, “You'll be looking at a very complex situation where I don't think there will be an appetite from foreign investors to touch Venezuela at all.”
Ama Adams, a partner at Ropes & Gray in Washington, has been having a different Venezuela-related conversation with her clients, which include energy companies, financial service providers and real estate and construction businesses.
Many of them are considering whether they have risks associated with sovereign wealth debt issues based on the latest U.S. sanctions. She added her clients are “looking at various counterparty relationships to see if they can continue … and if there are any subsidiaries that PDVSA might own overseas or in the U.S. that could be impacted.”
“We have clients who have counterparty relationships with PDVSA, clients who are dealing with debt and equity securities related to PDVSA and have to continue to assess security implications,” she added.
While Salcedo and Quinter said their clients were eager for a regime change in Venezuela, Adams said her clients are simply hoping for a resolution that will lift the sanctions impacting a range of industries.
Until that happens, those businesses are going to have to be vigilant about risk and compliance screening.
The latest sanctions “now requires companies to really look at their transactions and dealings with PDVSA,” she said.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBrazil Is Quickly Becoming a Vital LatAm Market for Greenberg Traurig, Other US Law Firms
5 minute read'Would've Been Snoring Without Ya': Fort Lauderdale Jury Awards $4.5 Million in Condo Investment Spat
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250