'I Was Racist in 1984': Miami Lawyer Tweets About White-Savior Complex
Miami lawyer Adrian Arkin got candid about her past racial biases via Twitter, prompting some to commend her openness.
February 05, 2019 at 02:56 PM
5 minute read
Miami lawyer Adrian Arkin of insurance law firm Mintz Truppman sent an unlikely tweet into the Twitterverse, getting candid about how her perception of black people has evolved since the 1980s — when sitcom “Diff'rent Strokes” regularly appeared on America's TV screens.
Arkin said she stands by her tweet, but stressed that the opinion is her own, not that of her firm.
“I'm proud of the tweet,” she said. “I thought it was an important tweet and I thought it was an important thing to say.”
Twitter is no stranger to personal anecdotes, but Arkin said she fears the tweet might be “incorrectly read.”
“Nobody who's ever met me would say that I am shy about subjects that other people won't mention. I definitely think we need to talk about these things,” she said. “We do talk about these things inside the firm, because they affect everything. But that still doesn't mean that it's the persona of the firm. The firm is an insurance law group.”
Arkin's post came on the heels of a group discussion about Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam, who faces heavy criticism over his college yearbook page, displaying a photo of one man in blackface and another wearing a Ku Klux Klan costume.
“I don't remember ever having those kind of thoughts, but I think it's always important to point out that we are brought up in a society that teaches us this,” Arkin said. “We're taught racism from day one. It's part of the system.”
'It's a journey'
The tweet was refreshingly self-aware in the eyes of Melba V. Pearson, president of the Gwen S. Cherry Black Women Lawyers Association and deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida.
“I commend what [Arkin's] saying because [she's] understanding that this is a journey. You don't wake up one day and you're no longer racist,” Pearson said. ”It's evolution, it's constant education. And you have to make the conscious effort to expose yourself to people who are different than you.”
The way Pearson sees it, it's easy for law firms to overlook the need to continually work on eradicating implicit bias.
“If you're like, 'Check, we do a Black History Month event. Check, we do something around MLK,' and that's the last that you talk about race for the next 365 days, that's not moving the needle forward,” Pearson said.
Because implicit racial bias, by nature, isn't obvious, Pearson hopes more lawyers and firms will follow Arkin's lead in talking openly about it.
“Firms and other corporations sometimes think it's lovely to do a one-day training on implicit bias, or a one-day training on equity and inclusion,” Pearson said. “That's not enough, because you can't undo years of a particular way of thinking in a two-hour session.”
The post also appealed to Monique D. Hayes, president of the Wilkie D. Ferguson Jr. Bar Association.
“I think we have to appreciate racism for what it is — ignorance. The most vile form of ignorance, but ignorance nonetheless,” Hayes said. “We have to give people room to learn and move beyond their ignorance. As Maya Angelou said, 'When you know better, do better.' ”
In Hayes' view, there's a massive difference between having once believed in a white-savior trope and having dressed up as a Ku Klux Klan member.
“ Both scenarios are rooted in racism, but one also reflects a callousness that is wholly incompatible with public trust,” Hayes said.
Cole, Scott & Kissane's Trelvis Randolph, former Wilkie D. Ferguson Jr. Bar Association president, said that honest, open dialogue about race is always a positive thing.
“It's something that we tend to, as a nation, shy away from,” Randolph said. “It's very sensitive for obvious reasons, from all points of view. However, until we can begin to actually have these conversations, it will always be a sensitive subject. it will always be something that people shy away from.”
In addition to talking about racial bias, Arkin wants to see people tackling it.
“The problem is that just looking back and thinking, 'Oh, I used to think like this' doesn't solve the problem either,” she said. “We have to have a world where the system changes so that kids aren't unaware of these issues from day one.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBenworth Accused of Predatory Tactics in Foreclosure Dispute as Elderly Defendant's Health Deteriorates
4 minute read'Get Rid of the Men': Employer Accused of Discrimination
Trending Stories
- 1Davis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
- 2Construction Fall Nets $2.3 Million Settlement After Trial Begins
- 3By the Numbers: The 2024 LTN Law Firm Tech Survey
- 4Can The Threat of a Bar Complaint Be a Settlement Tool?
- 5Sentencing Commission Addresses Inconsistent Definitions of “Loss”
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250