Bank Teller Sues Wells Fargo Over Alleged Bullying, Sexual Harassment
Surveillance footage, body odor rumors and vagina drawings, South Florida lawyer Chad E. Levy said he's never seen an unlawful retaliation case like it.
February 06, 2019 at 01:59 PM
4 minute read
Broward bank teller Melissa Barrios has struck financial giant Wells Fargo Bank N.A. with a lawsuit that claims co-workers sexually harassed and bullied her until she became an outcast in her own district.
It began when a co-worker allegedly spread rumors he'd had sex with Barrios and drew pictures of her vagina to show to colleagues, according to the complaint, filed by attorneys Chad E. Levy and David M. Cozad of the Law Offices of Levy & Levy in Sunrise.
According to the lawsuit, bank managers retaliated against Barrios when she complained about the lurid drawings and rumors, leaving her with no choice but to quit her job in October 2017.
The case landed in Broward Circuit Court in December but was removed to the Southern District of Florida on Monday at Wells Fargo's request.
Barrios claims she submitted an online complaint to human resources, which forwarded the information to the alleged harasser's managers. They initially did nothing, the complaint said, then later began churning the rumor mill against Barrios.
The complaint alleges one manager uploaded a YouTube recording claiming the plaintiff would go to a Publix supermarket across the street from the bank to defecate in the restroom. Another manager allegedly spread rumors that she had body odor.
The lawsuit also points the finger at a former service manager who allegedly convinced HR to pull years-old video footage that he claimed showed Barrios breaking wind and depicted co-workers moving away from her because she smelled.
“Plaintiff never actually saw the videos, but everyone in her branch and district made a commotion about them and were constantly talking about the footage and the YouTube page,” the complaint said.
|
Click here to read the complaint
Defense counsel Alex Drummond of Seyfarth Shaw in Georgia, did not respond to requests for comment before deadline.
Wells Fargo spokeswoman Michelle Palomino said in a statement, “While Wells Fargo disputes the facts as presented, we take these allegations seriously. We do not believe the applicable law supports Ms. Barrios' claims, and Wells Fargo will defend itself vigorously against these allegations in court.”
Levy, lead counsel for the plaintiff, has worked on numerous retaliation cases but says he's never seen one like this.
“The allegations that [Barrios] is raising are demonstrating, really, a conscientious effort by the company to make it extremely difficult for her to either continue working there or really feel that her complaints will be taken seriously,” Levy said. “I've never seen something that, in this manner, was trying to just embarrass somebody.”
Though discovery hasn't started yet, Levy said he's seen no reason to doubt the veracity of the plaintiff's claims.
“It was really embarrassing for [Barrios], it was really difficult for her and she struggled with the idea of doing this because it was going to make it more of a public matter,” Levy said. “But it was something that I think anyone in her position would have felt was inappropriate and would have taken the same action she did.”
Barrios is also an aspiring singer, according to the complaint, which pointed out that the alleged YouTube footage could affect her future.
The lawsuit asks for punitive damages, attorney fees and costs for Wells Fargo's alleged unlawful retaliation and constructive discharge, since Barrios allegedly felt she had to resign. Punitive damages are capped at $300,000 under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and $100,000 under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBenworth Accused of Predatory Tactics in Foreclosure Dispute as Elderly Defendant's Health Deteriorates
4 minute read'Get Rid of the Men': Employer Accused of Discrimination
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250