Tough Sanctions on Venezuela's Crude Extend Past US Borders
Putting more pressure on the government of Nicolas Maduro, the Trump administration levied heavy sanctions against Venezuela's state-owned oil giant.
February 07, 2019 at 09:14 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The sanctions imposed by the Trump administration on Venezuela's national oil conglomerate, Petroleos de Venezuela SA, are expected to impact companies and institutions well beyond the borders of the U.S. and Venezuela.
“Anybody outside of the U.S. can be sanctioned because the U.S. can take the view that it's supporting” PDVSA, said Sanjay Mullick, international trade and national security partner at Kirkland & Ellis in Washington. “It indicates that the U.S. seeks to apply these sanctions extraterritoriality.”
Sanctions levied by the United States are generally designed to have the broadest impact possible, Mullick said. Non-U.S. institutions and individuals run the risk of jeopardizing access to the U.S. financial system if the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control determines they are providing significant support to PDVSA.
The sanctions directed at Venezuela's state-owned oil company are the Trump administration's latest effort to ratchet up pressure on Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro's government. In January, 19 countries, including Canada, Colombia, France and the U.S., recognized Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaido as the nation's interim president. U.S. National Security Adviser John Bolton estimates the sanctions will affect $7 billion in PDVSA assets.
Venezuela relies heavily on crude exports to prop up its economy. The U.S. takes in more than 500,000 barrels a day as Venezuela's second-largest consumer of crude exports. A dozen tankers loaded with Venezuelan crude have been spotted idling for days as exporters scramble to find a new destination to unload the cargo.
U.S. companies that deal with PDVSA have a reprieve, however. PDVSA subsidiaries CITGO Holdings and PDV Holdings have received six-month general licenses, though revenue must be placed in a U.S.-based escrow account. The licenses extend to other companies that had long been doing business with the Venezuelan company, including Baker Hughes, Chevron, Valero, Halliburton and Schlumberger, with the caveat that they do not send diluents, a compound which would allow PDVSA to process its heavy crude in other international refineries.
But when companies must choose between the U.S. and countries under U.S. sanctions, it is the U.S. interests that usually prevail, primarily because of the dollar's status as the preferred denomination for global finance, Mullick said.
Since the U.S. exit from the Iranian nuclear deal and the reimposition of sanctions, European banks have shied away from Iranian business.
“The U.S. has long gotten non-U.S. banks to heel because of their dependency on the dollar,” Mullick said.
As a result of the newly imposed sanctions, companies must take stock of all deals and holdings as even indirect touch points with Venezuela can be seen as violating the sanctions, said Holland & Knight sanctions attorney Gabriel Caballero. Violations carry penalties that include civil fines, blocked transactions or even criminal charges.
“Let's say your company creates valves and you export them to a distributor in Latin America. If that distributor re-exports your product to Venezuela, you run the risk of getting hit with sanctions,” said Caballero, who is part of Holland & Knight's 20-attorney Venezuela focus team.
The broad nature of the sanctions means industries outside of the petroleum space may see some sanctions, including logistics companies that ship to Venezuela and even attorneys who represent Venezuelan clients in transactions or litigation.
Despite all of the restrictions, Caballero stresses Venezuela has not yet gone the way of Cuba or Iran. Commercial and humanitarian activities related to such items as medical devices, for example, are still allowed.
“I would characterize Venezuela as a yellow light,” Caballero said.
|Related Stories:
Holland & Knight Forms Venezuela Practice in Light of Political Turmoil
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readThe Inflation Reduction Act: Evaluating Its Impact on Renewable Energy Producers and Analyzing Emerging Needs
Caribbean Energy Needs Are on the Rise, and Plenty of That Work is Headed For U.S. Law Firms
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250