Broward Judge Disqualified From 12 Engle Progeny Cases Over Ex Parte Conversation
The Fourth District Court of Appeal granted a petition by tobacco defendants in 12 cases to have Broward Circuit Judge William W. Haury disqualified after he disclosed ex parte communication with a plaintiffs lawyer.
February 07, 2019 at 10:56 AM
4 minute read
The Fourth District Court of Appeal granted a petition to disqualify Broward Circuit Judge William W. Haury Jr. from 12 Engle progeny cases after he disclosed an ex parte communication with a plaintiff's lawyer in another case.
The defendants — tobacco giants R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Philip Morris USA Inc., Liggett Group LLC, and holding company Vector Group Ltd. — had sought Haury's removal in light of an announcement he made during a status conference in a case brought by smoker Johnnie Calloway's family.
According to the opinion, Haury told the court he'd known Steven Hammer, one of Calloway's lawyers, for more than 30 years. They'd played on the same flag football team and now lived down the street from one another, Haury pointed out.
Haury also disclosed a conversation he had with Hammer about the consolidation of cases in tobacco litigation, according to the opinion, which labeled this “a hot button issue.”
According to the opinion, Haury said, “This past Sunday, I spoke with [Hammer] with regard to his recent trial in front of Judge Rodriguez. I guess it went until approximately midnight one night. We also spoke briefly with regard to Judge Rodriguez and his thoughts concerning consolidations.”
On the heels of that disclosure, the defendants in that case petitioned to have Haury disqualified. When the court said no, the defense filed a petition for writ of prohibition, according to the opinion.
But before the plaintiff had time to demonstrate why Haury shouldn't be removed from the case — which was slated for trial in three weeks — he disqualified himself and had it transferred to another judge.
Related story: Smoker Attorneys Flirted With Reversal of $75 Million Award
This prompted defendants in 15 other tobacco cases before Haury to petition for his removal. The court agreed the judge should step down from three — as Hammer featured on the plaintiff's team — but it denied the 12 in which Hammer wasn't involved.
|'Very Troubled'
The defense appealed, claiming Haury had also displayed bias by disqualifying himself from the Calloway case and hand-picking his replacement.
The Fourth DCA also took issue with that move as the decision was still pending in the appellate court when Haury passed it on.
“We are very troubled by the fact that in the Calloway disqualification order, the trial judge ignored our stay order and directed that the Calloway case be transferred to another judge, specifically named, and that the scheduled trial was to begin on a specific date,” the opinion said.
That said, the court pointed out Haury had complied with Canon 3E(1) by trying to avoid the appearance of impropriety in the Calloway case and disclosing his links with Hammer.
The decision overturns the trial court's order denying Haury's removal in the remaining 12 cases, as the Fourth DCA said it couldn't be sure Haury's actions were harmless.
|
Click here to read the full court opinion
Judge Burton C. Conner wrote the opinion, backed by Judges Jonathan D. Gerber and Cory J. Ciklin.
Conner closed by stressing that the decision is this case shouldn't mean that Haury should be disqualified from all Engle progeny cases that come before him.
Counsel to R.J. Reynolds, Val Leppert and William L. Durham II and Jeffrey L. Furr did not respond to requests for comment before deadline. Philip Morris attorneys Stacey E. Deere and Timothy E. Congrove, and lawyers for Liggett Group LLC and Vector 2 Group LTD, Kelly Anne Luther, Maria H. Ruiz and Giselle Manseur, were also unresponsive.
Tallahassee plaintiffs lawyer John S. Mills declined to comment on the case, while Miami plaintiffs lawyers Juan P. Bauta II and James L. Ferraro did not respond before deadline.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRogge Dunn Represents Florida Trucking Firm in Civil RICO Suit Against Worldwide Express
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250