Broward Judge Disqualified From 12 Engle Progeny Cases Over Ex Parte Conversation
The Fourth District Court of Appeal granted a petition by tobacco defendants in 12 cases to have Broward Circuit Judge William W. Haury disqualified after he disclosed ex parte communication with a plaintiffs lawyer.
February 07, 2019 at 10:56 AM
4 minute read
The Fourth District Court of Appeal granted a petition to disqualify Broward Circuit Judge William W. Haury Jr. from 12 Engle progeny cases after he disclosed an ex parte communication with a plaintiff's lawyer in another case.
The defendants — tobacco giants R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Philip Morris USA Inc., Liggett Group LLC, and holding company Vector Group Ltd. — had sought Haury's removal in light of an announcement he made during a status conference in a case brought by smoker Johnnie Calloway's family.
According to the opinion, Haury told the court he'd known Steven Hammer, one of Calloway's lawyers, for more than 30 years. They'd played on the same flag football team and now lived down the street from one another, Haury pointed out.
Haury also disclosed a conversation he had with Hammer about the consolidation of cases in tobacco litigation, according to the opinion, which labeled this “a hot button issue.”
According to the opinion, Haury said, “This past Sunday, I spoke with [Hammer] with regard to his recent trial in front of Judge Rodriguez. I guess it went until approximately midnight one night. We also spoke briefly with regard to Judge Rodriguez and his thoughts concerning consolidations.”
On the heels of that disclosure, the defendants in that case petitioned to have Haury disqualified. When the court said no, the defense filed a petition for writ of prohibition, according to the opinion.
But before the plaintiff had time to demonstrate why Haury shouldn't be removed from the case — which was slated for trial in three weeks — he disqualified himself and had it transferred to another judge.
Related story: Smoker Attorneys Flirted With Reversal of $75 Million Award
This prompted defendants in 15 other tobacco cases before Haury to petition for his removal. The court agreed the judge should step down from three — as Hammer featured on the plaintiff's team — but it denied the 12 in which Hammer wasn't involved.
'Very Troubled'
The defense appealed, claiming Haury had also displayed bias by disqualifying himself from the Calloway case and hand-picking his replacement.
The Fourth DCA also took issue with that move as the decision was still pending in the appellate court when Haury passed it on.
“We are very troubled by the fact that in the Calloway disqualification order, the trial judge ignored our stay order and directed that the Calloway case be transferred to another judge, specifically named, and that the scheduled trial was to begin on a specific date,” the opinion said.
That said, the court pointed out Haury had complied with Canon 3E(1) by trying to avoid the appearance of impropriety in the Calloway case and disclosing his links with Hammer.
The decision overturns the trial court's order denying Haury's removal in the remaining 12 cases, as the Fourth DCA said it couldn't be sure Haury's actions were harmless.
Click here to read the full court opinion
Judge Burton C. Conner wrote the opinion, backed by Judges Jonathan D. Gerber and Cory J. Ciklin.
Conner closed by stressing that the decision is this case shouldn't mean that Haury should be disqualified from all Engle progeny cases that come before him.
Counsel to R.J. Reynolds, Val Leppert and William L. Durham II and Jeffrey L. Furr did not respond to requests for comment before deadline. Philip Morris attorneys Stacey E. Deere and Timothy E. Congrove, and lawyers for Liggett Group LLC and Vector 2 Group LTD, Kelly Anne Luther, Maria H. Ruiz and Giselle Manseur, were also unresponsive.
Tallahassee plaintiffs lawyer John S. Mills declined to comment on the case, while Miami plaintiffs lawyers Juan P. Bauta II and James L. Ferraro did not respond before deadline.
Related stories:
Philip Morris' 'Militant Resistance' Revealed in Fee Fight Documents
No Rehearing for Cole Scott Clients in Cases Requesting Judge Miller's Recusal
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTragedy on I-95: Florida Lawsuit Against Horizon Freight System Could Set New Precedent in Crash Cases
2 minute read'You Lied to the Jury': Veteran Awarded $5 Million in Defamation Case Against CNN
4 minute readVedder Price Shareholder Javier Lopez Appointed to Miami Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250