Antitrust Lawsuit Against Miami and Ultra Music Festival Proceeds in Federal Court
U.S. District Judge Ursula Ungaro has set a preliminary hearing for March 22, only a week before the internationally recognized Ultra festival is set to take place.
February 13, 2019 at 01:37 PM
3 minute read
The latest twist in a legal drama between two Miami music festivals has revived the prospect of a protracted court battle.
On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Ursula Ungaro scheduled a March 22 preliminary hearing in Rapture Electronic Music Festival's lawsuit against Ultra Music Festival, Miami and the Virginia Key Beach Trust.
The Miami judge previously dismissed the case, writing the plaintiff pinned its claims “exclusively on conclusory allegations of conspiracy backed by no factual allegations whatsoever.”
The case revived after Rapture attorney Paul Silverberg filed an amended complaint.
“We accepted the Judge's comments and put more details on the malicious actions against Rapture into the amended complaint,” Silverberg said in a statement. “We will now proceed full speed against Ultra, EEG, the city of Miami and Virginia Key Beach Park Trust for the wrongful actions they have taken.”
The lawsuit accuses city officials of collaborating with Ultra to help the music industry monolith put Rapture out of business. Rapture, a smaller dance music festival with an environmental bent, was scheduled for March 29-30 at Virginia Key, the venue where it had been situated since premiering in 2017.
However, Ultra's forcible removal from its longtime home in downtown Miami's Bayfront Park compelled the gathering to find a new location for its 21st event.
Unfortunately for Rapture's organizers, Ultra picked the city-owned Virginia Key park and overlapping dates of March 29-31. The Miami City Commission's approval of Ultra's new site displaced Rapture, and the smaller event has been fighting back ever since.
Read the amended complaint:
The latest complaint charges the defendants with conspiracy to unreasonably restrain trade and attempted monopolization, and singles out Ultra on a tortious interference count. Additionally, the amended filing contains exhibits cataloging Rapture's dealings with the city and details just how far along the festival was in assembling its 2019 event.
In his statement, Silverberg reiterated his client's intention to “stand up for our festival and our fans, vendors, DJs and so many others that make Rapture so special.”
“This is definitely the fight of the growing festival versus the machine and those only caring about money,” he said. “A loss for Rapture is just another step toward 'them' limiting your choices and your experiences.”
Silverberg did not respond to requests for comment by deadline.
Ultra attorneys Sandy York and Michael Gaid did not reply to inquiries by deadline. A Feb. 4 statement released by the festival said, “There is no merit to the recent lawsuit.”
Guy Forchion, executive director of the Virginia Key Beach Park Trust, did not respond to a request for comment.
Requests for comment from Miami City Attorney Victoria Mendez and Assistant City Attorney Xavier Alban also were not returned.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
- 2Cravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
- 3Kline & Specter Hit With Lawsuit From Another Former Associate
- 4USPTO Director Kathi Vidal Announces Resignation Ahead of Administration Change
- 5As Gen AI Acceptance Grows, Lawyers Race to Mitigate Risks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250