Insurance Fight Over Gloria Estefan's Hotel Decided on Appeal 15 Years Later
The dispute is over 2004 hurricane damage to an oceanfront resort owned by Gloria and Emilio Estefan.
February 14, 2019 at 12:40 PM
3 minute read
Gloria Estefan must regret the day she heard of the Palm Court Resort Hotel.
The four-time Grammy Award winner and her producer-husband Emilio Estefan purchased the luxury oceanfront resort through their Pin-Pon Corp., only to see it heavily damaged by two hurricanes that struck in the hyperactive 2004 season.
The company has been locked in insurance litigation ever since, and the Fourth District Court of Appeal on Wednesday subtracted from a $5.64 million judgment based on a pretrial stipulation.
The panel rejected Pin-Pon's attempt to back out of a stipulation limiting Landmark American Insurance Co.'s coverage for building code upgrades to $2.5 million. The company wrote an excess commercial property insurance policy to kick in after Lexington Insurance Co.'s primary policy.
The owner of the renamed Costa d'Este Beach Resort & Spa in Vero Beach asked to withdraw the code upgrade cap offered in the first trial before a retrial, arguing it misinterpreted the policy. Indian River Circuit Judge Paul Kanarek agreed.
But the Fourth DCA said the standard of review for withdrawing a stipulation was abuse of discretion, and it didn't find any.
“While the trial court was not bound by the legal stipulation, Pin-Pon's purported mistake of law (or subsequent change in its interpretation of the policy) is not good cause for withdrawal from its factual stipulation,” Judge Alan Forst wrote for a unanimous panel. The company “should have remained bound to the factual stipulation.”
For its part, Landmark argued it should be credited with $906,470 in previous payments, but Forst wrote its stipulation to $698,774 was binding. Kanarek set the credit at $651,278.
Stephen A. Marino Jr., managing shareholder of Ver Ploeg & Lumpkin in Miami, represented Pin-Pon in both trials and appeals. Curtis Miner of Colson Hicks Eidson in Coral Gables also represented the company.
In a statement, Marino said, “We are very pleased that Pin-Pon's long saga to get its insurer to cover the 2004 hurricane damages is finally coming to an end with the insurer being compelled to pay millions in code upgrade damages, as well as attorney's fees and costs.”
The case was remanded for a reduced award of $2.5 million minus the previous payment for a net award of about $1.9 million. The interest calculation is expected to add about $1 million to the final judgment.
After getting hit by Hurricanes Frances and Jeanne, Pin-Pon rebuilt the hotel while negotiating with its insurance carriers. It repaired the property, upgraded to meet the latest building code requirements and reopened in 2008.
The first trial ended in 2012 with a $7 million award, including damages for building damage and business interruption. A retrial was ordered only on the amount of code upgrades to be assessed against Landmark, and the retrial ended in 2017 with the $5.6 million award.
Landmark was represented by Hinda Klein of Conroy Simberg in Hollywood and Lauren Levy of Levy Law Group in Coral Gables. They did not respond to requests for comment by deadline.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All830 Brickell is Open After Two-Year Delay That Led to Winston & Strawn Pulling Lease
3 minute readMiami Lawyers Beat Other Local Sectors, Attorneys Elsewhere in Office Usage
3 minute read'Would've Been Snoring Without Ya': Fort Lauderdale Jury Awards $4.5 Million in Condo Investment Spat
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250