Insurance Fight Over Gloria Estefan's Hotel Decided on Appeal 15 Years Later
The dispute is over 2004 hurricane damage to an oceanfront resort owned by Gloria and Emilio Estefan.
February 14, 2019 at 12:40 PM
3 minute read
Gloria Estefan must regret the day she heard of the Palm Court Resort Hotel.
The four-time Grammy Award winner and her producer-husband Emilio Estefan purchased the luxury oceanfront resort through their Pin-Pon Corp., only to see it heavily damaged by two hurricanes that struck in the hyperactive 2004 season.
The company has been locked in insurance litigation ever since, and the Fourth District Court of Appeal on Wednesday subtracted from a $5.64 million judgment based on a pretrial stipulation.
The panel rejected Pin-Pon's attempt to back out of a stipulation limiting Landmark American Insurance Co.'s coverage for building code upgrades to $2.5 million. The company wrote an excess commercial property insurance policy to kick in after Lexington Insurance Co.'s primary policy.
The owner of the renamed Costa d'Este Beach Resort & Spa in Vero Beach asked to withdraw the code upgrade cap offered in the first trial before a retrial, arguing it misinterpreted the policy. Indian River Circuit Judge Paul Kanarek agreed.
But the Fourth DCA said the standard of review for withdrawing a stipulation was abuse of discretion, and it didn't find any.
“While the trial court was not bound by the legal stipulation, Pin-Pon's purported mistake of law (or subsequent change in its interpretation of the policy) is not good cause for withdrawal from its factual stipulation,” Judge Alan Forst wrote for a unanimous panel. The company “should have remained bound to the factual stipulation.”
For its part, Landmark argued it should be credited with $906,470 in previous payments, but Forst wrote its stipulation to $698,774 was binding. Kanarek set the credit at $651,278.
Stephen A. Marino Jr., managing shareholder of Ver Ploeg & Lumpkin in Miami, represented Pin-Pon in both trials and appeals. Curtis Miner of Colson Hicks Eidson in Coral Gables also represented the company.
In a statement, Marino said, “We are very pleased that Pin-Pon's long saga to get its insurer to cover the 2004 hurricane damages is finally coming to an end with the insurer being compelled to pay millions in code upgrade damages, as well as attorney's fees and costs.”
The case was remanded for a reduced award of $2.5 million minus the previous payment for a net award of about $1.9 million. The interest calculation is expected to add about $1 million to the final judgment.
After getting hit by Hurricanes Frances and Jeanne, Pin-Pon rebuilt the hotel while negotiating with its insurance carriers. It repaired the property, upgraded to meet the latest building code requirements and reopened in 2008.
The first trial ended in 2012 with a $7 million award, including damages for building damage and business interruption. A retrial was ordered only on the amount of code upgrades to be assessed against Landmark, and the retrial ended in 2017 with the $5.6 million award.
Landmark was represented by Hinda Klein of Conroy Simberg in Hollywood and Lauren Levy of Levy Law Group in Coral Gables. They did not respond to requests for comment by deadline.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllVedder Price Shareholder Javier Lopez Appointed to Miami Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board
2 minute readReal Estate Trends to Watch in 2025: Restructuring, Growth, and Challenges in South Florida
3 minute read830 Brickell is Open After Two-Year Delay That Led to Winston & Strawn Pulling Lease
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Ex-Kline & Specter Associate Drops Lawsuit Against the Firm
- 2Am Law 100 Lateral Partner Hiring Rose in 2024: Report
- 3The Importance of Federal Rule of Evidence 502 and Its Impact on Privilege
- 4What’s at Stake in Supreme Court Case Over Religious Charter School?
- 5People in the News—Jan. 30, 2025—Rubin Glickman, Goldberg Segalla
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250