Thanks to Artificial Intelligence, Finding a Florida Lawyer Just Got Easier
Meet the Florida Bar's new and improved online lawyer referral service, covering 120 practice areas in 47 counties and featuring 12 different languages.
February 14, 2019 at 01:10 PM
5 minute read
The Florida Bar has modernized its online lawyer referral platform, teaming with California technology company Legal.io to incorporate artificial intelligence able to match client's needs with the most suitable lawyer.
The new version covers 120 practice areas in 47 counties that previously had no online lawyer referral service. Consumers can now run quick searches for local lawyers around the clock, using up to 12 different languages.
The project took two years to implement, according to Florida Bar President-elect John M. Stewart, who chairs its Committee on Technologies Affecting the Practice of Law.
The Florida Bar introduced its lawyer referral service in 1972, which included email referrals by the late 1980s, and went online around 2005, Stewart said. But progress has stalled since then.
“Unfortunately, since that time it had never changed, and obviously the technology had changed rather dramatically,” Stewart said.
While many Florida companies and organizations managed to keep up with consumer appetites for faster, less clunky technology, the legal realm lagged behind. Finding a lawyer remained more complicated than it needed to be, causing many Floridians to get disheartened and give up, Stewart said.
“While there are a lot of consumers who aren't getting to lawyers or aren't finding lawyers, there are a lot of lawyers who are unemployed or underemployed,” Stewart said. “That disconnect is illogical.”
|How does it work?
The platform uses machine learning in an attempt to eliminate frustration by picking up on the nuances of a client's request, understanding what practice area they need even if they don't use the right terminology.
“A consumer can now go onto the system and type in something like, 'I can't afford to pay my rent,' or 'My landlord is not fixing the air conditioner,' and they'll get directed to a landlord-tenant attorney because the computer understands keywords and phrases,” Stewart said.
The computer then suggests two or three local lawyers who meet the criteria, allowing the client to click on their profiles and contact them through the platform.
“How they connect after that is up to them,” Stewart said. “But they don't now have to get off and make a phone call or have to wait for the attorney to call them.”
Attorneys must complete an application with a $125 sign-up fee, have professional liability insurance of at least $100,000 and be in good standing with the bar to be featured on the platform.
About 700 lawyers have signed up so far, Stewart said.
“It seems low,” Stewart said. “But we think with this new system we're going to get a lot more referrals and a lot more lawyers that want to participate.”
Broward, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach aren't covered, as they and 17 other counties already have online lawyer referral services.
“The Florida Bar does not wish to be competitive with those within our own family,” Stewart said.
That said, Stewart hopes that voluntary bar associations might eventually roll into the system in addition to having their own.
The bar already provides more than 70,000 referrals annually—a number Stewart expects to rise. And while he concedes it's ”not perfect,” the revamp could become a model for other states. The New York State Bar Association has also updated its lawyer referral platform using Legal.io.
“This is just the first part of a very long evolution of what will happen with this product,” Stewart said.
According to Stewart, at least three more phases of improvements are in the works.
If consumers don't find what they're looking for on the Florida Bar site—say, a pro bono lawyer—Stewart hopes consumer will eventually be able to connect with a legal aid group without having to leave the platform.
Florida Bar President Michelle Suskauer is excited about the platform.
“It's able to so easily connect the consumer with the lawyer that can truly help them,” Suskauer said. “If you're connected blindly, you can waste time and people can get frustrated. But by really harnessing the technology that's out there, the Florida Bar is on the forefront of this.”
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRogge Dunn Represents Florida Trucking Firm in Civil RICO Suit Against Worldwide Express
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250