Thanks to Artificial Intelligence, Finding a Florida Lawyer Just Got Easier
Meet the Florida Bar's new and improved online lawyer referral service, covering 120 practice areas in 47 counties and featuring 12 different languages.
February 14, 2019 at 01:10 PM
5 minute read
The Florida Bar has modernized its online lawyer referral platform, teaming with California technology company Legal.io to incorporate artificial intelligence able to match client's needs with the most suitable lawyer.
The new version covers 120 practice areas in 47 counties that previously had no online lawyer referral service. Consumers can now run quick searches for local lawyers around the clock, using up to 12 different languages.
The project took two years to implement, according to Florida Bar President-elect John M. Stewart, who chairs its Committee on Technologies Affecting the Practice of Law.
The Florida Bar introduced its lawyer referral service in 1972, which included email referrals by the late 1980s, and went online around 2005, Stewart said. But progress has stalled since then.
“Unfortunately, since that time it had never changed, and obviously the technology had changed rather dramatically,” Stewart said.
While many Florida companies and organizations managed to keep up with consumer appetites for faster, less clunky technology, the legal realm lagged behind. Finding a lawyer remained more complicated than it needed to be, causing many Floridians to get disheartened and give up, Stewart said.
“While there are a lot of consumers who aren't getting to lawyers or aren't finding lawyers, there are a lot of lawyers who are unemployed or underemployed,” Stewart said. “That disconnect is illogical.”
How does it work?
The platform uses machine learning in an attempt to eliminate frustration by picking up on the nuances of a client's request, understanding what practice area they need even if they don't use the right terminology.
“A consumer can now go onto the system and type in something like, 'I can't afford to pay my rent,' or 'My landlord is not fixing the air conditioner,' and they'll get directed to a landlord-tenant attorney because the computer understands keywords and phrases,” Stewart said.
The computer then suggests two or three local lawyers who meet the criteria, allowing the client to click on their profiles and contact them through the platform.
“How they connect after that is up to them,” Stewart said. “But they don't now have to get off and make a phone call or have to wait for the attorney to call them.”
Attorneys must complete an application with a $125 sign-up fee, have professional liability insurance of at least $100,000 and be in good standing with the bar to be featured on the platform.
About 700 lawyers have signed up so far, Stewart said.
“It seems low,” Stewart said. “But we think with this new system we're going to get a lot more referrals and a lot more lawyers that want to participate.”
Broward, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach aren't covered, as they and 17 other counties already have online lawyer referral services.
“The Florida Bar does not wish to be competitive with those within our own family,” Stewart said.
That said, Stewart hopes that voluntary bar associations might eventually roll into the system in addition to having their own.
The bar already provides more than 70,000 referrals annually—a number Stewart expects to rise. And while he concedes it's ”not perfect,” the revamp could become a model for other states. The New York State Bar Association has also updated its lawyer referral platform using Legal.io.
“This is just the first part of a very long evolution of what will happen with this product,” Stewart said.
According to Stewart, at least three more phases of improvements are in the works.
If consumers don't find what they're looking for on the Florida Bar site—say, a pro bono lawyer—Stewart hopes consumer will eventually be able to connect with a legal aid group without having to leave the platform.
Florida Bar President Michelle Suskauer is excited about the platform.
“It's able to so easily connect the consumer with the lawyer that can truly help them,” Suskauer said. “If you're connected blindly, you can waste time and people can get frustrated. But by really harnessing the technology that's out there, the Florida Bar is on the forefront of this.”
Related stories:
Get Ready for Tougher Amendments to Florida Bar Rules
Law in the Time of Twitter: Do Chatty Lawyers Help or Hinder Their Careers?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
3 minute readMiami-Dade Litigation Over $1.7 Million Brazilian Sugar Deal Faces Turning Point
3 minute readMeta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How the Court of Public Opinion Should Factor Into Litigation Strategy
- 2Debevoise Lures Another SDNY Alum, Adding Criminal Division Chief
- 3Cooley Promotes NY Office Leader to Global Litigation Department Chair
- 4What Happens When Lateral Partners’ Guaranteed Compensation Ends?
- 5Tuesday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250