Does Miami-Dade's Living Wage Ordinance Apply to Airport Contractors? Appeal Court Says No
The Third District Court of Appeal rules that although Ultra Aviation Services Inc. operates at the county-owned Miami International Airport, the company is not subject to Miami-Dade's living wage ordinance because it works for private companies, not the county.
February 15, 2019 at 05:26 PM
4 minute read
The Third District Court of Appeal ruled Miami-Dade County can't enforce its living wage ordinance on Ultra Aviation Services Inc., a contractor at Miami International Airport, in response to a challenge from a part-time employee.
The living wage was established in 1999 to help citizens stay above the poverty line, according to the county's website, which says all aviation service contractors are covered.
But the court found that while Ultra leases space and conducts business at the county-owned airport, it doesn't directly serve Miami-Dade. Instead, it serves private airlines through separate, noncounty contracts, meaning it's exempt from the ordinance.
The question arose when employee Lisvan L. Cruz Clemente brought a lawsuit against Ultra in May 2017, alleging it reduced his hours and threatened to fire him after he complained about his wages. Cruz's suit claimed the airport's pay and health insurance plan for part-time workers was out of step with Miami-Dade County's ordinance.
Under the LWO, employers can either pay a higher wage without providing health insurance, or pay a lower wage and use the difference to provide coverage.
In 2017, Miami's living wage was $15.52 without health insurance and $12.63 with coverage, according to the complaint. Ultra paid Cruz Clemente the lower amount, but he claimed health insurance doesn't meet Affordable Car Act standards.
Ultra moved to dismiss the complaint, claiming it complies with the ordinance even though it's preempted by Florida statute section 218.077, which dictates that municipalities can't impose their own minimum wages or benefits.
Miami-Dade County intervened with a third-party complaint against Ultra, asking the court to find that its ordinance isn't preempted and that its health care requirements are invalid.
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Rodney Smith ruled the ordinance was constitutional and applied to Ultra, which appealed. And though the Third DCA didn't dispute the ordinance's validity, but ruled it doesn't apply to Ultra.
The opinion issued Wednesday analyzed the language in the statute considered its exceptions, including Miami-Dade County and vendors contracted to provide goods and services to, for or on behalf of the county, but found Ultra didn't fit.
|
Related story: Business Groups Fight Higher Miami Beach Minimum Wage
Judge Eric Hendon wrote the opinion, backed by Chief Judge Kevin Emas and Judge Vance E. Salter.
Counsel to Ultra, Miguel De Grandy of Holland & Knight in Miami, agreed with the decision.
“If the facts are that our contract is with Avianca and we're providing services to that airline, [the county] is not in privity of that contract, not a third-party beneficiary to that contract and, as a matter of fact, the permit says it's limited to the exclusive privilege of being able to solicit that business from other parties,” De Gandy said.
De Grandy pointed out that Ultra continues to meet the ordinance's standards, even though it doesn't have to.
“It's unfortunate that we had to litigate that issue when the facts show that we were voluntarily compliant,” De Grandy said.
Cruz Clemente's attorney, Brian H. Pollock of the Fairlaw Firm in Kendall, said he was disappointed with the decision and expects his client and Miami-Dade County will ask the court for a rehearing en banc.
“Our concern, like the concern of Dade County, is for the thousands of workers at the airport who are relying on the living wage ordinance to provide them with a wage that they can live on,” Pollock said. “The court's ruling effectively strips away that protection for so many hard-working men and women.”
Pollock has also launched a putative class action seeking damages on behalf of 600 Ultra employees — a case he fears may now be in jeopardy following this ruling. That lawsuit alleges Ultra's health insurance for part-time employees doesn't comply with the living wage.
Pollock said he worries that the ruling will allow entities with a permit to operate at the airport to pay “any wage they would like, as long as it meets the Florida minimum wage” — which was raised to $8.46 per hour in January.
Miami-Dade County Attorney Abigail Price-Williams and assistant attorneys David M. Murray, Cynji A. Lee and Altanese Phenelus declined to comment on the case.
Read the full court opinion:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Year-End Tax Planning: How Real Estate Investors Can Leverage Qualified Opportunity Funds
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250