Local Gov't Can Help Low-Income Residents Benefit From the Opportunity Zone Program
The Opportunity Zone program is receiving major attention in the real estate industry. Real estate developers and investors are expected to deploy a substantial amount of capital in Opportunity Zones.
February 19, 2019 at 10:55 AM
6 minute read
The Opportunity Zone program is receiving major attention in the real estate industry. Real estate developers and investors are expected to deploy a substantial amount of capital in Opportunity Zones. They are located in economically distressed communities where new investments, under certain conditions, can qualify for tax breaks. The Treasury Department designated nearly 9,000 census tracts as Opportunity Zones across urban and rural areas throughout the United States. It is estimated that approximately 35 million Americans live in Opportunity Zones, which have higher poverty and unemployment rates than the rest of the nation.
Some of Miami's Opportunity Zones (OZs) are in downtown Miami, Wynwood, Hialeah and North Miami. While developers stand to reap the benefits of tax breaks it is not clear how residents of low-income neighborhoods in Opportunity Zones will benefit from the redevelopment of their communities. The current legislation and the proposed regulations do not impose any requirements on generating social or public benefits for those who live in OZs; rather, the standards are based upon purely economic formulas. We believe that it would be appropriate to have some degree of governmental involvement/regulation in the process to ensure that the development of OZs provides public benefits for the economically disadvantaged residents in Opportunity Zone areas since, by definition, OZs are based upon both a lower-income standard or poverty standard.
Our local government and community stakeholders can play a proactive role in making the tax program advantageous to the Miami's low-income residents who deserve their fair share of the benefits from this federal program. For examples, elected officials can incentivize OZ developers or public companies to:
- Provide job training, job availability and hiring preferences to current residents living in Opportunity Zones.
- Create affordable and workforce housing to avoid the displacement of the residents and gentrification of historic communities.
- Increase the services available for the lower income population including transportation improvements, health care improvements, healthy food options and educational services.
- Engage residents and community organizations in the process as well as local elected and appointed officials.
- Take advantage of community redevelopment agency grants and programs, such as those that exist in various areas in the city of Miami such as the Overtown CRA, the Omni CRA and the Southwest CRA where grants are provided to assist residents in the area to acquire residential units. Therefore, residents who could otherwise not afford to acquire or rent upgraded, or new units will now afford to do so based upon the grants and incentives provided.
- Monitor the ultimate results of development in Opportunity Zone areas to see what social issues are being addressed or need to be addressed.
The one clear benefit of Opportunity Zone developments for both private industry and the government is that the property tax base will increase based upon the enhanced value being created by the OZ development. The increase in tax dollars should be redeployed back into local Opportunity Zones to benefit the residents who otherwise face the risk of being displaced by the new influx of OZ capital. It is important that our local government acts sooner rather than later before the OZ program shuts down low-income residents from the urban renewal that is expected to occur in neglected communities across Miami-Dade and beyond. We trust local government will use the Opportunity Zone program as a tool to help improve its constituents' quality of life and prevent the displacement that often comes with gentrification.
Opportunity Zones are called “Opportunity Zones” because they are supposed to provide opportunities to the residents as well as the investors. Policy Link indicated that there will be substantial investment in Opportunity Zones and there is a need to connect people to growth and opportunities to ensure that all residents participate and thrive.
As a result of this concern, the following factors should be considered in improving neighborhood quality of life:
- Good jobs. This includes job training and trying to improve the standard of living of residents in the area by having governments incentivize developers or public companies to provide job training, job availability and hiring preferences to current residents living in Opportunity Zones.
- Creation of affordable and workforce housing to avoid the displacement of the residents and gentrification of historic communities.
- Increase the services available for the lower-income population including transportation improvements, healthcare improvements, healthy food options and educational services.
- Engaging local residents and community organizations in the process as well as local elected and appointed officials.
- Taking advantage of community redevelopment agency grants and programs, such as those that exist in various areas in the city of Miami such as the Overtown CRA, the Omni CRA and the Southwest CRA where grants are provided to assist residents in the area to acquire residential units. Therefore, residents who could otherwise not afford to acquire or rent upgraded or new units will now afford to do so based upon the grants and incentives provided.
- Assistance to try to monitor the ultimate results of development in Opportunity Zone areas to see what social issues are being addressed.
- The one clear benefit of Opportunity Zone developments for both private industry and the government is that the property tax base will increase based upon the enhanced value being created by the Opportunity Zone development. Accordingly, not only will there be job generation for the construction of buildings and the servicing of those buildings or new businesses created, but the increase in tax dollars that should be redeployed back into local Opportunity Zones to benefit those residents who are otherwise affected by the potential displacement.
- Another key factor in Opportunity Zone development is the analysis of institutional lending for multi-family, single family, commercial buildings and small business institutions in Opportunity Zone areas as well.
In conclusion, we think it would be advantageous for us to meet with the appropriate government officials and community stakeholders to further discuss the status of what is being developed in Opportunity Zones and how to integrate the government in the process to benefit not only the economy in general, but those residents who live in Opportunity Zones who otherwise need to obtain their fair share of the benefits from the overall process.
Ronald R. Fieldstone is a partner in the Miami office of Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr. He focuses his practice on real estate, corporate/securities and taxation law.
Miguel Diaz de la Portilla is a partner in the Miami office of the firm. He concentrates his practice in the areas of land use and zoning, code enforcement, government procurement and administrative law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTurning the Shock of a January Marital Split Into Effective Strategies for Your Well-Being
5 minute readTrending Issues in Florida Construction Law That Attorneys Need to Be Aware Of
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250