Local Gov't Can Help Low-Income Residents Benefit From the Opportunity Zone Program
The Opportunity Zone program is receiving major attention in the real estate industry. Real estate developers and investors are expected to deploy a substantial amount of capital in Opportunity Zones.
February 19, 2019 at 10:55 AM
6 minute read
The Opportunity Zone program is receiving major attention in the real estate industry. Real estate developers and investors are expected to deploy a substantial amount of capital in Opportunity Zones. They are located in economically distressed communities where new investments, under certain conditions, can qualify for tax breaks. The Treasury Department designated nearly 9,000 census tracts as Opportunity Zones across urban and rural areas throughout the United States. It is estimated that approximately 35 million Americans live in Opportunity Zones, which have higher poverty and unemployment rates than the rest of the nation.
Some of Miami's Opportunity Zones (OZs) are in downtown Miami, Wynwood, Hialeah and North Miami. While developers stand to reap the benefits of tax breaks it is not clear how residents of low-income neighborhoods in Opportunity Zones will benefit from the redevelopment of their communities. The current legislation and the proposed regulations do not impose any requirements on generating social or public benefits for those who live in OZs; rather, the standards are based upon purely economic formulas. We believe that it would be appropriate to have some degree of governmental involvement/regulation in the process to ensure that the development of OZs provides public benefits for the economically disadvantaged residents in Opportunity Zone areas since, by definition, OZs are based upon both a lower-income standard or poverty standard.
Our local government and community stakeholders can play a proactive role in making the tax program advantageous to the Miami's low-income residents who deserve their fair share of the benefits from this federal program. For examples, elected officials can incentivize OZ developers or public companies to:
- Provide job training, job availability and hiring preferences to current residents living in Opportunity Zones.
- Create affordable and workforce housing to avoid the displacement of the residents and gentrification of historic communities.
- Increase the services available for the lower income population including transportation improvements, health care improvements, healthy food options and educational services.
- Engage residents and community organizations in the process as well as local elected and appointed officials.
- Take advantage of community redevelopment agency grants and programs, such as those that exist in various areas in the city of Miami such as the Overtown CRA, the Omni CRA and the Southwest CRA where grants are provided to assist residents in the area to acquire residential units. Therefore, residents who could otherwise not afford to acquire or rent upgraded, or new units will now afford to do so based upon the grants and incentives provided.
- Monitor the ultimate results of development in Opportunity Zone areas to see what social issues are being addressed or need to be addressed.
The one clear benefit of Opportunity Zone developments for both private industry and the government is that the property tax base will increase based upon the enhanced value being created by the OZ development. The increase in tax dollars should be redeployed back into local Opportunity Zones to benefit the residents who otherwise face the risk of being displaced by the new influx of OZ capital. It is important that our local government acts sooner rather than later before the OZ program shuts down low-income residents from the urban renewal that is expected to occur in neglected communities across Miami-Dade and beyond. We trust local government will use the Opportunity Zone program as a tool to help improve its constituents' quality of life and prevent the displacement that often comes with gentrification.
Opportunity Zones are called “Opportunity Zones” because they are supposed to provide opportunities to the residents as well as the investors. Policy Link indicated that there will be substantial investment in Opportunity Zones and there is a need to connect people to growth and opportunities to ensure that all residents participate and thrive.
As a result of this concern, the following factors should be considered in improving neighborhood quality of life:
- Good jobs. This includes job training and trying to improve the standard of living of residents in the area by having governments incentivize developers or public companies to provide job training, job availability and hiring preferences to current residents living in Opportunity Zones.
- Creation of affordable and workforce housing to avoid the displacement of the residents and gentrification of historic communities.
- Increase the services available for the lower-income population including transportation improvements, healthcare improvements, healthy food options and educational services.
- Engaging local residents and community organizations in the process as well as local elected and appointed officials.
- Taking advantage of community redevelopment agency grants and programs, such as those that exist in various areas in the city of Miami such as the Overtown CRA, the Omni CRA and the Southwest CRA where grants are provided to assist residents in the area to acquire residential units. Therefore, residents who could otherwise not afford to acquire or rent upgraded or new units will now afford to do so based upon the grants and incentives provided.
- Assistance to try to monitor the ultimate results of development in Opportunity Zone areas to see what social issues are being addressed.
- The one clear benefit of Opportunity Zone developments for both private industry and the government is that the property tax base will increase based upon the enhanced value being created by the Opportunity Zone development. Accordingly, not only will there be job generation for the construction of buildings and the servicing of those buildings or new businesses created, but the increase in tax dollars that should be redeployed back into local Opportunity Zones to benefit those residents who are otherwise affected by the potential displacement.
- Another key factor in Opportunity Zone development is the analysis of institutional lending for multi-family, single family, commercial buildings and small business institutions in Opportunity Zone areas as well.
In conclusion, we think it would be advantageous for us to meet with the appropriate government officials and community stakeholders to further discuss the status of what is being developed in Opportunity Zones and how to integrate the government in the process to benefit not only the economy in general, but those residents who live in Opportunity Zones who otherwise need to obtain their fair share of the benefits from the overall process.
Ronald R. Fieldstone is a partner in the Miami office of Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr. He focuses his practice on real estate, corporate/securities and taxation law.
Miguel Diaz de la Portilla is a partner in the Miami office of the firm. He concentrates his practice in the areas of land use and zoning, code enforcement, government procurement and administrative law.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllData Breaches, Increased Regulatory Risk and Florida’s New Digital Bill of Rights
7 minute readNavigating Florida's Products Liability Law: Defective Products, Warnings and the Pursuit of Justice
6 minute readNavigating Florida Property Insurance Claims in a Post-Fee-Shifting World
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250