'So Close and Tender': Plaintiff Seeks Miami Judge's Removal Over Handholding With Opposing Counsel
A Miami condominium association and its president questioned Miami-Dade Circuit Judge William Thomas' impartiality after he chatted, laughed and clasped hands with opposing counsel Mary Barzee Flores in the courtroom, according to court filings.
February 19, 2019 at 02:57 PM
6 minute read
A Miami condominium association and its president have asked the Third District Court of Appeal to remove Miami-Dade Circuit Judge William Thomas from five lawsuits disputing maintenance issues with its master association and developer after the judge affectionately placed his hands on opposing counsel Mary Barzee Flores' hands in a bench-side conversation.
Barzee Flores, who served on the Miami-Dade Circuit bench from 2003 to 2011, asked to approach the bench toward the end of a Jan. 17 status conference for a private conversation with Thomas about an unrelated matter. The pair chatted for a few minutes and were laughing and smiling, according to the petitions.
De Soleil South Beach Residential Condominium Association Inc. filed writs of prohibition, along with its president David Ocomo, a defendant in one of the cases.
After Ocomo saw the courtroom exchange between Thomas and Barzee Flores, he became concerned that their relationship was “so close and tender that it appeared familial or one based on a lifelong or extremely personal relationship,” according to the petitions.
The petitions also alleged that Thomas gave Barzee Flores “his rapt attention and respect” throughout the status conference, but “would look down or appear annoyed and even display a tone of hostility” to the other side.
The two had worked together as federal public defenders for the Southern District of Florida, and the condominium association had been concerned about their friendship before Thomas and Barzee Flores held hands, according to the petition.
Before the chat, Thomas had ruled in favor of the master association, — Barzee Flores' client, De Soleil South Beach Beach Association Inc.
On Jan. 28, the condominium association moved to disqualify Thomas, claiming he wasn't impartial. When Thomas denied them, they appealed to the Third DCA.
Counsel to South Beach Resort Development, Richard Jay Sarafan of Genovese Joblove & Battista in Miami, declined to comment on the case,but pointed to his client's response to the petition, branding it “legally insufficient.”
According to their response, Barzee Flores had approached Thomas to tell him about her new job with Florida Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried as deputy commissioner for consumer affairs — a job that's since taken her away from her firm and off the case.
Barzee Flores did not respond to a request for comment before deadline. Her former colleagues representing the master association, Jason S. Koslowe, Michael Blid and Kenneth Walton II were unavailable before deadline.
Counsel to the condominium association Jonathan Smulevich said Ocomo was upset by what he saw.
“My client felt it was quite unusual,” Smulevich said. “He was quite emotional about it and said, 'How can this happen in an American courtroom, where judges are basically socializing in open court?' ”
It's about the appearance of impropriety in Smulevich's view, as the conversation wouldn't have been a problem if it happened outside the courtroom, away from litigants.
“ I'm not saying people can't be friends, of course,” Smulevich said. “But there has to be a distinction of when you're outside the courtroom versus when you're inside the courtroom.”
According to Smulevich, litigants and lawyers were still in the courtroom as the status conference only went off the record when Barzee Flores asked to approach.
“It's unusual behavior to happen right after a hearing, for the judges to be laughing in court, touching each other,” Smulevich said. “It's not something clients would want to see.”
Ocomo said Tuesday he was shocked to see how close Thomas and Barzee Flores appeared.
“It took my faith away from the system,” he said. “People are allowed to have friends, but when you're in the court you're supposed to convey fairness.”
Read the petition:
'Ridiculous'
Miami lawyer Brian Tannebaum of Bast Amron specializes in ethics and white-collar defense, and regularly gets calls from lawyers asking whether they should petition to remove a judge.
“If I had been asked about filing this motion I would have said, 'Don't file it,' ” Tannebaum said. “ I think it's ridiculous. Particularly because it's after losing a motion, it just kind of shows what the basis of the motion really is. 'We lost, we're upset, we want to raise this issue.' ”
It's not unusual for judges and lawyers to be friends, said Tannebaum, who stressed that it's a judge's job to ensure that doesn't affect their rulings on a case.
“ I'm friends with judges and they do me no favors when it comes to being in court,” Tannebaum said. “I've been before judges who have said, 'I'm very good friends with Mr. Tannebaum, we have a history together. Do you have an issue with that?' And I can't remember a time that a lawyer has said, 'Yes.' ”
Tannebaum worked with Thomas as a state public defender and said he's known as being “ straight down the middle when it comes to fairness.”
If a judge can't be impartial, they're expected to recuse themselves — like one judge did when Tannebaum, his former judicial campaign manager, appeared before him.
It's a balancing act, according to Jan Jacobowitz, legal ethics expert and law professor at the University of Miami.
“Even the appearance of impropriety is against the judicial canons,” Jacobowitz said. “And it's hard to know without being there, but we have to rely on our judges to know whether they can rule impartially or not. Miami has a very close-knit legal community, so there's a lot of overlapping relationships and people have to act professionally.”
Related stories:
Broward Judge Disqualified From 12 Engle Progeny Cases Over Ex Parte Conversation
No Rehearing for Cole Scott Clients in Cases Requesting Judge Miller's Recusal
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Judge Ordered Squabbling Lawyers to Have Lunch: Here's What Happened
Sorry. We Can't Get to Your Case: Judge Speaks Out on Judicial Shortages
Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250