Bankruptcy Judge Rejects Sale of Palm House Hotel to Creditor
The unfinished Palm Beach hotel-condominium at the center of EB-5 visa fraud allegations is headed for auction March 8, the latest of several scheduled dates.
February 20, 2019 at 03:53 PM
4 minute read
A bankruptcy judge has rejected the proposed sale of the Palm House Hotel to a former owner who claimed a $37.3 million secured interest in the unfinished hotel-condominium in tony Palm Beach.
A dispute between the owner and a key creditor KK-PB Financial LLC, which is managed by Wellington developer Glenn Straub, has jammed up the proceedings on a property tainted by civil allegations of EB-5 investment visa fraud.
The owner and debtor, 160 Royal Palm LLC, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection last August, putting the Palm House Hotel in line for auction. KK-PB Financial wants to place a credit bid, saying it holds a senior mortgage on the property where a 79-unit development was planned.
Straub bought the property at auction for $10 million in 2009 and sold his membership interest in the company in 2013.
KK-PB Financial maintains 160 Royal Palm defaulted on the $27.5 million mortgage issued with the 2013 sale and now claims a security interest of $37.3 million. The stalking horse bid for the bankruptcy auction is $32 million.
KK-PB asked U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Erik Kimball to estimate its secured claim to get a credit from the auction.
160 Royal Palm's court-appointed manager Cary Glickstein, a former Delray Beach mayor, responded by asking the court to limit KK-PB's ability to credit bid.
The push to limit KK-PB's recovery is to make sure the EB-5 investors get as much payout from the sale as possible, said Philip Landau, a Boca Raton attorney who filed 160 Royal Palm's bankruptcy petition.
Instead of battling it out in court, 160 Royal Palm and KK-PB considered a settlement and asset purchase agreement. KK-PB would have bought the Palm House Hotel for $10.26 million, breaking down to $5.12 million in cash and $5.14 million in credit, according to the proposal filed Jan. 25 by 160 Royal Palm.
The company said it planned to use the cash to pay, among other things, the claims of EB-5 investors. But Kimball on Feb. 11 denied 160 Royal Palm's motion.
The dispute resumed over how much, if anything, KK-PB can take away as credit. The auction has been delayed several times since Nov. 16 and is now scheduled for March 8.
The stalking horse bid by an affiliate of New York-based developer and fund manager Related Cos. LP was approved by Kimball last October.
Landau said 160 Royal Palm pursued the settlement because KK-PB's claim for a first-priority secured mortgage would wipe out any recovery by the EB-5 investors.
According to the proposed settlement, KK-PB's claim against the property is $39.6 million.
“If the mortgage holds up, then the only part that gets paid off is KK-PB's,” said Landau, founding partner of Shraiberg, Landau & Page. “The EB-5 investors would get nothing out of that.”
KK-PB's attorney, Salazar Law partner Luis Salazar in Coral Gables, declined comment on Kimball's denial of the settlement and asset purchase agreement.
Investors from China, Iran and Turkey collectively put at least $40 million into the project, according to their civil lawsuit.
The lawsuit alleged the Palm House Hotel, which sits on 1.4 acres at 160 Royal Palm Way, was used in a scheme to siphon funds from foreign EB-5 investors putting money into redevelopment.
The EB-5 program gives foreigners a path to obtaining green cards in exchange for putting at least $500,000 in a U.S. project that creates at least 10 jobs. EB-5 fraud claims are doubly damaging to investors who generally lose their money as well as a chance at legal residency.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250