Miami Attorney Reps Florida Prisoners in Class Action Over Impounded Music
Florida Justice Institute Executive Director Dante Trevisani is one of the attorneys leading litigation against the Florida Department of Corrections over the state prison system's seizure of digital songs and book purchased by inmates. He is joined by lawyers from the Tampa Bay and Kansas City-based Social Justice Law Collective firm.
February 20, 2019 at 03:31 PM
4 minute read
A federal lawsuit is accusing the Florida Department of Corrections of unlawfully separating Florida inmates from their rightful property, namely, digital media they'd purchased in prison.
The class action filed in the Northern District of Florida on Tuesday charges the FDOC and its newly appointed secretary, Mark Inch, with violating Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment assurances of compensation and due process by confiscating music and books that Florida prisoners had bought.
FDOC Press Secretary Patrick Manderfield said “the department has not been served this lawsuit,” but would “thoroughly review it upon receipt.”
Dante Trevisani, the executive director of Miami public interest law firm the Florida Justice Institute, said the new policy is a result of the FDOC's partnership with a new vendor, Miramar-based JPay, for the state prison system's digital music player program.
“If the music could transfer, it would negate the new vendor's ability to make money. This was the explicit reason it was done,” Trevisani said.
The complaint claims advertisements touting the digital media players promised inmates: “Once music is purchased, you'll always own it!” Now, prisoners are being compelled to hand in their old devices in exchange for new Jpay-branded ones without any of the media they'd purchased. What's more, the suit claims the FDOC has declined to offer compensation for the seizure of materials prisoners had thought they owned outright. Now, if they want access to the music or books they'd previously enjoyed, they'll have to buy them a second time.
Joshua Glickman, a former attorney with the Florida Justice Institute and founding member of the Social Justice Law Collective, is one of the lawyers representing the class outlined in the suit. He referred to the FDOC's actions as “completely unacceptable.”
“For a lot of these prisoners this music program was a huge thing for them,” Glickman said. “These were not just songs, this was a way for these prisoners who had life sentences or 25 years or more … to have a little slice of normalcy. And to just have it ripped away from them is completely unacceptable.”
Read the lawsuit:
Glickman said both he and Trevisani's firms “started receiving a deluge of letters from inmates and their family members complaining about the loss of their property.”
“Once we started looking into it … we were somewhat surprised at not only that they were confiscating these inmate's lawfully purchased properties, but the reasoning that they were giving these inmates,” Glickman said, calling the FDOC's justification for the policy “callous” and “indifferent.”
Trevisani said the FDOC ignored prisoner's grievances before developing a standard response which said the ability for inmates to keep their media would “negate the vendor's ability to make money.” He summarized the prison system's sentiment as “We're sorry you feel this way, but we hope you'll come to acknowledge the value of this program.”
The named plaintiff in the case, William Demler, is an inmate at the South Florida Reception Center in Doral. He had purchased more than 300 songs on his old media player and expressed his concerns about the new policy with both the prison as well as the attorneys. Trevisani said the legal team hopes “to get a class certified of everyone who lost out on” media they'd owned prior to the new policy's implementation.
“The class as we defined it is all FDOC prisoners whose music was taken pursuant to this transition from the old media players to the new tablets,” he said. Through litigation, Trevisani and his co-counsel are hoping to get Demler and class members “access to the old music by transferring it to the new player or some other means.”
“For some people, this is all they have,” Trevisani added. “There was advertising to induce them to buy the music. It said you'd own it forever, and people believed that.”
Related stories:
Florida Justice Institute Pressed for Hepatitis C Cure for State Prisoners
Appeals Court Hears Case Over Kosher Food in Florida Prisons
State Corrections Officials Bring on New Prison Health Provider
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Adding 'Credibility' to the Pitch: The Cross-Selling Work After Mergers, Office Openings
- 2Low-Speed Electric Scooters and PIP, Not Perfect Together
- 3Key Updates for Annual Reports on Form 10-K for Public Companies
- 4When Words Matter: Mastering Interpretation in Complex Disputes
- 5People in the News—Jan. 28, 2025—Buchanan Ingersoll, Kleinbard
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250