Businesses, Insurers Target 'Phantom' Health Costs in House Hearing
The House Civil Justice Subcommittee heard testimony from insurance industry and business representatives about “phantom” medical damages and how so-called letters of protection are being used.
February 21, 2019 at 01:15 PM
3 minute read
A Florida House panel heard two hours of testimony about how health care costs and a spate of court rulings have affected insurance premiums, though it also drew criticism for focusing on the wants of insurers and other businesses.
The House Civil Justice Subcommittee heard testimony from insurance industry and business representatives about “phantom” medical damages and how so-called letters of protection are being used.
Cary Silverman, an attorney representing the American Tort Reform Association, told lawmakers that Florida should not allow juries to consider what health care providers bill for services when considering damages in lawsuits.
Instead, he wants juries to see the amounts that hospitals and doctors agree to accept from insurance companies to settle bills.
“The difference between those amounts are what some people refer to as phantom damages,” he said, noting that larger amounts appear on initial invoices but are not paid. “It was just an amount that existed nowhere but on paper.”
The testimony came as insurers and business groups try to build support for legislation that could limit lawsuits during the annual session that starts March 5.
But Melody Page, who is with the Florida Medical Rights Association, criticized subcommittee Chairman Bob Rommel, R-Naples, for assembling speakers dominated by business interests.
“I'm truly astonished that this hearing took place without a speaker on the agenda to discuss how recommendations here today affect citizens and victims of this state,” said Page, who wants the Legislature to eliminate a law that bans adult children and parents of adult children from suing for medical negligence.
“Everyone on this panel represents insurance regulators, big corporations and those hired to protect them,” she said.
Rommel downplayed the criticism after the meeting.
“We were addressing a problem,” he told The News Service of Florida, adding that lawmakers have heard from constituents about rising insurance and health care costs, “so we are trying to gather information to see if we have to do something in the future.”
Along with phantom costs, lawmakers heard about the increasing use of letters of protection, also an issue when people are privately insured. The letters are issued by law firms and contain what Silverman described as phantom costs.
Lauren McBride, an attorney in Publix Super Markets' risk management program, told lawmakers that the letters are becoming an increasing problem and are a reason why it costs the company 65 percent more to settle claims litigated in Florida than in any of the other states where the chain operates.
McBride said in 2018 the company spent $60 million defending and settling liability claims.
“It's not exaggeration when I tell all of you that the single most impactful factor in that spend is letters of protection,” she said.
The letters, she said, contain inflated health care costs. She told committee members that juries can use those inflated health care costs to determine other costs, such as plaintiffs' future pain and suffering and loss of future earning capacity.
“Those numbers can be difficult to quantify for a jury,” she said. “So medical damages are often used as a multiplier to determine the overall award.”
Christine Sexton reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFla.'s Statute of Limitations and Statutes of Repose in Med Mal Cases: It's Not Over Until It's Over
6 minute readGC of Florida State Agency Steps Down After Threatening TV Stations That Aired Abortion-Rights Ad
Trending Stories
- 1'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
- 2Class Action Filed Against Houston Health Savings Account Firm for Allegedly Confiscating Client Funds
- 3These 2 Lawyers Just Became Florida Judges
- 4'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
- 5Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250