Watch the Video: Lawyer Fakes Trial to Make Sweet Marriage Proposal in Court
Florida Assistant State Attorney Brandon Dinetz surprised his girlfriend, fellow litigator Jennifer Lettman, with a wedding proposal in the Palm Beach County Courthouse.
February 21, 2019 at 02:27 PM
5 minute read
Jennifer Lettman was sitting in a gallery at the Palm Beach County Courthouse on Feb. 7 when she saw a juror who looked like her boyfriend's father. The Link & Rockenbach lawyer was in attendance to sit in on a DUI trial being litigated by her romantic partner, Assistant State Attorney Brandon Dinetz, which made the coincidence even odder.
Initially, she didn't think much of it.
“I almost took out my laptop and started to work,” Lettman said. “When the judge came in and asked for the jury, I stood — as you normally do — and I remember seeing someone who resembled Brandon's dad. I actually remember thinking I wanted to tell him that later.”
But soon Lettman recognized more familiar faces among the jury, including her own father and sister. At first, she kept quiet and remained consummately professional. But as Dinetz's opening statement turned to the meaning of love and “the indescribable feeling of warmth you get from another person,” the reality of what was happening set in for Lettman.
“That's when it clicked,” she said. “That's when the tears starting coming.”
As Lettman would later learn, Dinetz spent nearly two months preparing the moment he would get on one knee and ask for her hand in marriage — in the last place she expected: their usual place of work.
Watch the proposal here:
“The courtroom idea was the idea from the very beginning; I just didn't know how exactly I'd pull it off,” Dinetz said of his ambitious wedding proposal. It made for a fitting venue, as the couple first connected in 2016 while working at the State Attorney's Office.
“We met during his first week at the office and I was involved in a training session with the new hires,” Lettman said. Both of them described their interest in one another as near-instantaneous.
“We started dating about two months after we started working together,” Dinetz said. “We moved in with each other about a year into our relationship, got a dog and an apartment together. Once we were coming up on a year and a half, I knew there was no one else I wanted to be with.”
In order to realize his vision of surprising Lettman in a courtroom surrounded by the people closest to them, Dinetz took extra precautions to ensure everything would be above board.
“We made sure we cleared it ethically to make sure there were no issues or conflicts,” Dinetz said. This included finding a day that a courtroom would have no scheduled hearings, as well as ensuring no attorneys present were attending at taxpayer's expense or while on company time. “I took the day off,” Dinetz said. “Everyone involved was on their lunch break or a volunteer.”
Dinetz even had to involve Lettman's boss to ensure her schedule was clear for that day.
“There were a lot of moving parts to make sure that everything was done, … that everything worked out,” Dinetz said. He described the proposal itself as “a really happy moment for all of us,” including the couple's friends and family.
“It sounded like she was almost laughing and then crying when she realized what was going on,” said Dinetz, who couldn't see Lettman while he was presenting to the “jury.”
“She was amazed that I was able to keep it a secret so long, and she was amazed how many people were involved that didn't let slip what was going to happen,” he said. “It was the first time she said she's truly been surprised by something.”
His future bride was impressed.
“He knows me so well. Without us ever talking about any ideal proposal, he knew I'd want my close friends and family [present], but not to be super public,” Lettman said. “Everyone who knows us have told me how great we are together, which I never get sick of hearing, so it's just wonderful they were part of it.”
In the two weeks since, video of the proposal has been viewed more than 10,000 times on YouTube. But even with all of the excitement and attention, Dinetz and Lettman are content to take things easy for now.
“I think I'm out of surprises for a little while,” Dinetz said. “To be honest, I never expected it to get this much attention.” According to him, the couple have yet to start planning the particulars of the wedding itself. “I think we're just set. It's really nice to just use the word 'fiancée.' ”
Lettman said it's “ wonderful” that most things about their relationship have remained “exactly the same” since the big day.
“We have a great relationship, which is why there was no pressure for an engagement or a wedding or anything,” she said. “I've told him several times I don't need the engagement. He's it for me. Even though we were always committed to each other, there's a nice sense of permanence that comes with it. I also love screaming across the house, 'Fiancée!' “
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRogge Dunn Represents Florida Trucking Firm in Civil RICO Suit Against Worldwide Express
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250