Watch the Video: Lawyer Fakes Trial to Make Sweet Marriage Proposal in Court
Florida Assistant State Attorney Brandon Dinetz surprised his girlfriend, fellow litigator Jennifer Lettman, with a wedding proposal in the Palm Beach County Courthouse.
February 21, 2019 at 02:27 PM
5 minute read
Jennifer Lettman was sitting in a gallery at the Palm Beach County Courthouse on Feb. 7 when she saw a juror who looked like her boyfriend's father. The Link & Rockenbach lawyer was in attendance to sit in on a DUI trial being litigated by her romantic partner, Assistant State Attorney Brandon Dinetz, which made the coincidence even odder.
Initially, she didn't think much of it.
“I almost took out my laptop and started to work,” Lettman said. “When the judge came in and asked for the jury, I stood — as you normally do — and I remember seeing someone who resembled Brandon's dad. I actually remember thinking I wanted to tell him that later.”
But soon Lettman recognized more familiar faces among the jury, including her own father and sister. At first, she kept quiet and remained consummately professional. But as Dinetz's opening statement turned to the meaning of love and “the indescribable feeling of warmth you get from another person,” the reality of what was happening set in for Lettman.
“That's when it clicked,” she said. “That's when the tears starting coming.”
As Lettman would later learn, Dinetz spent nearly two months preparing the moment he would get on one knee and ask for her hand in marriage — in the last place she expected: their usual place of work.
Watch the proposal here:
“The courtroom idea was the idea from the very beginning; I just didn't know how exactly I'd pull it off,” Dinetz said of his ambitious wedding proposal. It made for a fitting venue, as the couple first connected in 2016 while working at the State Attorney's Office.
“We met during his first week at the office and I was involved in a training session with the new hires,” Lettman said. Both of them described their interest in one another as near-instantaneous.
“We started dating about two months after we started working together,” Dinetz said. “We moved in with each other about a year into our relationship, got a dog and an apartment together. Once we were coming up on a year and a half, I knew there was no one else I wanted to be with.”
In order to realize his vision of surprising Lettman in a courtroom surrounded by the people closest to them, Dinetz took extra precautions to ensure everything would be above board.
“We made sure we cleared it ethically to make sure there were no issues or conflicts,” Dinetz said. This included finding a day that a courtroom would have no scheduled hearings, as well as ensuring no attorneys present were attending at taxpayer's expense or while on company time. “I took the day off,” Dinetz said. “Everyone involved was on their lunch break or a volunteer.”
Dinetz even had to involve Lettman's boss to ensure her schedule was clear for that day.
“There were a lot of moving parts to make sure that everything was done, … that everything worked out,” Dinetz said. He described the proposal itself as “a really happy moment for all of us,” including the couple's friends and family.
“It sounded like she was almost laughing and then crying when she realized what was going on,” said Dinetz, who couldn't see Lettman while he was presenting to the “jury.”
“She was amazed that I was able to keep it a secret so long, and she was amazed how many people were involved that didn't let slip what was going to happen,” he said. “It was the first time she said she's truly been surprised by something.”
His future bride was impressed.
“He knows me so well. Without us ever talking about any ideal proposal, he knew I'd want my close friends and family [present], but not to be super public,” Lettman said. “Everyone who knows us have told me how great we are together, which I never get sick of hearing, so it's just wonderful they were part of it.”
In the two weeks since, video of the proposal has been viewed more than 10,000 times on YouTube. But even with all of the excitement and attention, Dinetz and Lettman are content to take things easy for now.
“I think I'm out of surprises for a little while,” Dinetz said. “To be honest, I never expected it to get this much attention.” According to him, the couple have yet to start planning the particulars of the wedding itself. “I think we're just set. It's really nice to just use the word 'fiancée.' ”
Lettman said it's “ wonderful” that most things about their relationship have remained “exactly the same” since the big day.
“We have a great relationship, which is why there was no pressure for an engagement or a wedding or anything,” she said. “I've told him several times I don't need the engagement. He's it for me. Even though we were always committed to each other, there's a nice sense of permanence that comes with it. I also love screaming across the house, 'Fiancée!' “
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
3 minute readMiami-Dade Litigation Over $1.7 Million Brazilian Sugar Deal Faces Turning Point
3 minute readMeta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Legaltech Rundown: McDermott Will & Emery Invests $10 million in The LegalTech Fund, LexisNexis Releases Conversational Search for Nexis+ AI, and More
- 2The TikTokification of the Courtroom
- 3New Jersey’s Arbitration Appeal Deadline—A Call for Clarity
- 4Law Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
- 55th Circuit Strikes Down Law Barring Handgun Sales to Adults Under 21
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250