Secret Recordings and Lies: Lawsuits Paint Wild Picture of Steinger, Iscoe & Greene
Former attorneys allege the firm shared fees and paid "runners" a finder's fee for bringing in clients. But the firm claimed it uncovered hidden recording devices in accounting, human resources and other offices.
February 22, 2019 at 05:33 PM
3 minute read
Steinger, Iscoe & Greene, one of the largest personal injury firms in Florida, is being sued by former employees for allegedly instituting a quota system and pressuring clients to receive surgery.
The firm, meanwhile, has fired off its own suit, this one against a private detective accused of covertly installing surveillance equipment in Steinger, Iscoe & Greene offices.
The parties trade allegations of unethical behavior.
Among the litigants are two former attorneys who filed complaints against the law firm in Palm Beach Circuit Court. Their November 2018 lawsuits accuse the firm of “repeatedly encourag[ing] attorneys and paralegals to encourage the clients to obtain surgical interventions for their injuries whenever possible.” The lawsuit calls the arrangement “no surgery, no case.”
The filings also allege partner Michael Steinger created a system requiring each attorney to bill at least $250,000 each quarter.
Plaintiffs Lee Levenson and Robert Gonzalez allege they were fired from Steinger, Iscoe & Greene on Oct. 16 after expressing reservations about the firm's quota system and the conduct of its presuit division. Described in the suit as “a group of paralegals and non-lawyers who handled a client's claim prior to litigation,” that group allegedly shared fees and paid “runners” a finder's fee for bringing clients to the firm.
According to Gonzalez and Levenson's suits, their termination violated their employment agreements, and their lawsuits seek injunctive and declaratory relief.
But the firm denied the allegations, and has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuits.
“These lawsuits seek to characterize Steinger, Iscoe & Greene in a bad light to provoke the reader into believing false allegations and assertions that are plainly not true,” said attorney Michael Pike, who represents the firm. “No attorney has the ability to encourage a doctor to perform surgery. The decision for a client to elect surgery is made between the patient and the doctor, based on empirical data and physical examination. To state otherwise is simply fantasy.”
Pike further stated, “Steinger Iscoe & Greene does not have 'runners' or improper quotas.”
“Its ability to spend significant dollars on approved advertising places it in a position of appreciable market share, and this makes the firm an easy target,” he said.
Former Florida Bar president Greg Coleman represents attorneys Michael Steinger and Sean Greene.
“The allegations against Steinger and Greene will be dismissed as they are unfounded and defamatory,” he said. “We are preparing to seek sanctions, and will be filing a lawsuit for defamation and malicious prosecution.”
Meanwhile, Steinger, Iscoe & Greene is suing private detective Michael Coronel for allegedly placing recording devices within the walls of its West Palm Beach office, without the firm's permission. Coronel had worked for Levenson, and surveillance cameras caught him entering the firm during off-hours, according to court filings and the Palm Beach Post, which broke the news.
Gonzalez and Levenson's legal counsel, Justus Reid and Bernard Lebedeker, did not reply to a request for comment by deadline.
Read Steinger, Iscoe & Greene's invasion of privacy suit:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250