Addiction-Hit Miccosukee Tribe Lawyers Up Against Big Pharma
The Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida claims opioid addiction has turned many of its members into "shells of their former selves" in a lawsuit that puts 20 pharmaceutical companies on the hook for more than $100 million.
February 25, 2019 at 02:18 PM
4 minute read
The Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida has joined in the nationwide litigation revolt against opioids, seeking more than $100 million in a federal lawsuit against a slew of drug manufacturers and distributors that allegedly sent the tribe into crisis by pushing prescription painkillers.
Coral Gables lawyer Adam Moskowitz of the Moskowitz Law Firm filed the suit in the Southern District of Florida, calling out 12 defendants.
Among them are drug manufacturers Purdue Pharma L.P., which makes the narcotic pain reliever OxyContin; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, a branch of Johnson & Johnson; retail giant Walgreen Co. and wholesale distributor AmerisourceBergen Drug Corp.
The defendants used misleading marketing schemes to normalize opioid prescription and play down the dangers, according to the lawsuit, which seeks damages for negligence, public nuisance and violations of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.
“Opioid addiction and overdose (have) killed many tribal members and turned others into shells of their former selves,” the complaint said.
|
Read the full complaint:
The Miccosukee Tribe is a federally recognized Indian tribe spanning three reservations in western Broward and Miami-Dade. As a sovereign entity it governs itself and has spent tens of millions to stem the opioid epidemic with medical care, counseling, child care and law enforcement, according to the lawsuit.
When it comes to drug overdoses, Native Americans suffer the highest death rates of any ethnic or racial group in the U.S., according to the complaint, which says historical trauma has left the group more vulnerable to substance abuse.
The tribe's remote location and lack of educational opportunities have also made its members more vulnerable to substance abuse, according to Moskowitz.
“The Miccosukee Tribe itself is physically located out near the Everglades, so it's kind of an isolated part of our community. It's harder for a young person growing up in that community to integrate and to have the opportunities that a lot of us have,” he said.
Janssen Pharmaceuticals called the allegations “baseless and unsubstantiated,” claiming its marketing was appropriate and responsible, and that its labeling displayed the risks and benefits of drugs.
“Opioid abuse and addiction are serious public health issues,” a spokesperson from Janssen Pharmaceuticals said. “We are committed to being part of the ongoing dialogue and to doing our part to find ways to address this crisis.”
Gabe Weissman, vice president of communications at AmerisourceBergen, said the company is committed to combating opioid abuse, and pointed out that opioids constitute less than 2 percent of its sales.
“We are dedicated to doing our part as a distributor to mitigate the diversion of these drugs without interfering with clinical decisions made by doctors, who interact directly with patients and decide what treatments are most appropriate for their care,” Weissman said in a statement.
Walgreen Co. declined to comment on the case, while the remaining defendants did not respond to requests for comment before deadline.
The first Miccosukee Indian to have ever graduated from law school, Curtis E. Osceola, is also working on the case.
“They are extremely proud of him, and if anybody is going to represent them in legal affairs, of course, they would love somebody from their own tribe,” Moskowitz said. “Curtis is a wonderful role model and example for all of the tribe. … And now he's going to dedicate his career to helping his people.”
Though Moskowitz specializes in class action lawsuits, he and Osceola plan to opt out of a class action in the Northern District of Ohio, consolidating various cases brought by Native American tribes.
“We're doing our best to help our clients, and we believe in filing this case that's one step,” Moskowitz said. “But our larger goal is to help the tribe in general, in terms of their welfare, their betterment and their community involvement.”
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRogge Dunn Represents Florida Trucking Firm in Civil RICO Suit Against Worldwide Express
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settle Defamation Lawsuit Before Depositions
Trending Stories
- 1Lawyers Scramble to Secure Jobs Ahead of A&O Shearman's South Africa Closure
- 2Big Law's Biggest Stories (UK Edition) For 2024
- 3Luigi Mangione Indicted in Federal Court for Stalking, Murder and Firearms Offenses
- 4Biggest Legal Tech People Moves of 2024
- 5NY Civil Liberties Legal Director Stepping Down After Lengthy Tenure
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250