Bankruptcy Judge Rules Glenn Straub Can't Hog All Palm Beach Auction Money
An attorney says U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Erik Kimball "delivered a knockout punch" in a battle over auction proceeds from an unfinished hotel-condominium.
February 25, 2019 at 03:56 PM
4 minute read
The owner of an unfinished hotel-condominium won its push to stop wealthy Wellington developer Glenn Straub from reserving most or all the proceeds from the Palm Beach property's sale in a bankruptcy auction.
After filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection last August, the Palm House Hotel's owner, 160 Royal Palm LLC, asked to auction the salmon-colored, 82,648-square-foot building at the center of civil and criminal allegations of EB-5 investment visa fraud.
Straub's KK-PB Financial LLC argued it has a $39 million secured interest in the property where the stalking-horse auction bid is set at $32 million.
The two sides have been fighting about KK-PB's ability to credit bid in the auction tied to its secured interest, which could severely limit the cash proceeds available for distribution to others.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Erik Kimball in West Palm Beach ruled from the bench Friday that KK-PB can't credit bid any amount in the auction. A written order had not been posted by late Monday.
KK-PB Financial maintains 160 Royal Palm defaulted on its mortgage and asked the court to set how much it could credit bid on the development.
For its part, 160 Royal Palm pushed the court to limit KK-PB Financial's ability to credit bid to allow some recovery by the EB-5 investors.
KK-PB attorney Luis Salazar of Salazar Law in Coral Gables declined to say how his client plans to proceed, including whether KK-PB will lay claim to auction revenue.
But Philip Landau, the Boca Raton attorney representing 160 Royal Palm, said the judge went beyond the credit bidding question to bar a KK-PB claim to auction proceeds.
“My view of it is the judge delivered a knockout punch on Friday. They're done,” said Landau, a founding partner of Shraiberg, Landau & Page. ”Even though this was an estimation hearing, he (Kimball) was deciding their claim amount for all purposes throughout the rest of the bankruptcy case.”
A statement from Salazar appears to leave the door open for another hearing on a KK-PB claim.
“As to the claims of fraudulent transfer, Mr. Straub did not present valuation and insolvency experts at this estimation proceeding but intends to do so at the final hearing on this matter. Once the court hears from our experts, we believe we will prevail and have a fully allowed claim in this case,” Salazar said.
A motion by 160 Royal Palm filed last October asked Kimball to limit KK-PB Financial's credit bid and linked Straub and KK-PB to the alleged EB-5 fraud scheme.
Kimball decided there wasn't enough evidence presented by 160 Royal Palm for him to conclude Straub was involved, Salazar said.
“Straub's primary goal at this stage of this dispute was to refute the completely unfounded allegations that he was in any way involved with the fraudulent EB-5 investor scheme. We were completely successful in that effort, with the court finding that the receiver and his team did not present evidence supporting those allegations,” Salazar said.
At the same time, Landau said Kimball left an open question on Straub's role. Landau touted the ruling as a success for the foreign investors in terms of their potential recovery.
After several delays, the auction is scheduled for March 8 and bids are due by 5 p.m. March 4.
The stalking-horse bid serving as the minimum offer was submitted by RREF II Palm House LLC, an affiliate of New York-based developer and fund manager Related Cos. LP.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250