Coral Gables Attorney Helps Clinch $1.1M Settlement for Injured Shopper
Coral Gables attorney Adam Josephs represented Antonino Maurici in a premises liability suit against Jetro Restaurant Depot. In 2016, several wood pallets fell from a forklift and onto Maurici as he shopped.
February 25, 2019 at 03:10 PM
5 minute read
An investigation by a Coral Gables attorney into the safety practices of a nationwide food retailer helped secure $1.1 million for a client injured at one of it stores.
Adam Josephs helped negotiate a Dec. 4 settlement between Jetro Restaurant Depot, described as “the Costco for restaurant owners,” and Miami-Dade resident Antonio Maurici, who sued over an in-store 2016 incident that required him to receive surgery.
“The plaintiff was shopping for Italian deli meats when a R.D. employee attempted to drive a forklift stacked full of empty wood pallets through the aisle next to the plaintiff,” said Josephs, who served as Maurici's legal counsel. “When the employee realized he wouldn't be able to maneuver through the aisle, he came to a stop. The pallets, which were unsafely overstacked and not secured, toppled over on to the plaintiff.”
Josephs explained each pallet can weigh between 30 and 65 pounds, and it was not uncommon for Restaurant Depot to stack as many as 20 on top of one another for forklift transport.
Maurici underwent several operations as a result of his injuries, including surgery to repair a torn rotator cuff. Josephs said he was shocked to learn his client's injuries had been caused by a forklift.
“How does a forklift end up anywhere near a customer in a retail store?” Josephs asked. “With barricades, spotters and other safety measures, there shouldn't ever be an opportunity for this to happen.”
Read the complaint:
Upon the filing of Maurici's lawsuit four-count lawsuit in December 2017, Restaurant Depot claimed while “video was captured on the date of incident and is in defendant's possession,” the store has been “unable to retrieve said footage from its hard drive at this time.”
“In other words, the video footage from the date of the accident was 'accidentally' deleted,” Josephs said. In light of the plaintiff's inability to obtain video evidence, an independent investigation was conducted into Restaurant Depot's safety policies.
“In addition to speaking to other attorneys throughout the Southeastern United States, we personally looked through the online court files for the jurisdiction where each Restaurant Depot was located,” Josephs said. “When online access wasn't available, we had investigators visit the clerk in the jurisdiction in order to review the docket and every negligence complaint against Restaurant Depot.”
Following a court order to disclose all forklift-related accidents in the last five years, Restaurant Depot revealed that four had taken place. According to Josephs, it quickly became clear through his investigation this was “a gross understatement” of the true number of incidents.
“There were more than 15 prior forklift accidents involving customers that should have been disclosed,” he said. “In most negligence cases involving retailers, the occurrence of prior accidents in other store locations is not relevant to the issues in the subject case. In our case, we were able to demonstrate to the court that the history of prior forklift accidents around the country was highly relevant to a number of issues. Not only the negligence of Restaurant Depot in creating flawed polices and procedures, but its reckless disregard of its customer safety in light of the history of prior forklift accidents, which we believe would entitle the plaintiff to assert a claim for punitive damages.”
After the discovery of additional accidents, Restaurant Depot admitted to liability. The court then entered an order granting sanctions against the defendant, as well as awarding Maurici attorney fees.
The defendant responded to these orders — as well as an order requiring Restaurant Depot to disclose every forklift accident around the U.S. for the previous decade — with a challenge at the Third District Court of Appeals. Following a temporary stay, the Third DCA denied Restaurant Depot's petition for certiorari.
With the three motions pending, the parties reached a $1.1 million settlement on the eve of trial.
“I have no way of knowing whether Restaurant Depot has learned from this accident and made adjustments to its internal policies to better protect its customers,” Josephs said. “However, given the number of accidents and the manner in which its policies were created and are implemented, it seems as though they treat forklift accidents as nothing more than a cost of doing business.”
He added, “I suspect it is only a matter of time before they are punished by a jury with punitive damages.”
Resnick & Louis attorney Carolina Santangelo helped represent Restaurant Depot but declined to comment. Co-counsel Rob Squire, also of Resnick & Louis, did not respond to requests for comment.
Case: Antonio Maurici & Rosa Marie Maurici v. Jetro Restaurant Depot d/b/a Restaurant Depot and Moises De La Cruz Case No.: 2017-027744-CA-01 Description: Premises liability / forklift accident Filing date: Dec. 4, 2017 Settlement: Dec. 4, 2018 Judge: Judge Spencer Eig Plaintiff attorney: Adam C. Josephs, The Josephs Law Firm, Coral Gables Defense attorney: Carolina Santangelo and Rob Squire, Resnick & Louis PC Settlement Amount: $ 1.1 million
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250