Coral Gables Attorney Helps Clinch $1.1M Settlement for Injured Shopper
Coral Gables attorney Adam Josephs represented Antonino Maurici in a premises liability suit against Jetro Restaurant Depot. In 2016, several wood pallets fell from a forklift and onto Maurici as he shopped.
February 25, 2019 at 03:10 PM
5 minute read
An investigation by a Coral Gables attorney into the safety practices of a nationwide food retailer helped secure $1.1 million for a client injured at one of it stores.
Adam Josephs helped negotiate a Dec. 4 settlement between Jetro Restaurant Depot, described as “the Costco for restaurant owners,” and Miami-Dade resident Antonio Maurici, who sued over an in-store 2016 incident that required him to receive surgery.
“The plaintiff was shopping for Italian deli meats when a R.D. employee attempted to drive a forklift stacked full of empty wood pallets through the aisle next to the plaintiff,” said Josephs, who served as Maurici's legal counsel. “When the employee realized he wouldn't be able to maneuver through the aisle, he came to a stop. The pallets, which were unsafely overstacked and not secured, toppled over on to the plaintiff.”
Josephs explained each pallet can weigh between 30 and 65 pounds, and it was not uncommon for Restaurant Depot to stack as many as 20 on top of one another for forklift transport.
Maurici underwent several operations as a result of his injuries, including surgery to repair a torn rotator cuff. Josephs said he was shocked to learn his client's injuries had been caused by a forklift.
“How does a forklift end up anywhere near a customer in a retail store?” Josephs asked. “With barricades, spotters and other safety measures, there shouldn't ever be an opportunity for this to happen.”
Read the complaint:
Upon the filing of Maurici's lawsuit four-count lawsuit in December 2017, Restaurant Depot claimed while “video was captured on the date of incident and is in defendant's possession,” the store has been “unable to retrieve said footage from its hard drive at this time.”
“In other words, the video footage from the date of the accident was 'accidentally' deleted,” Josephs said. In light of the plaintiff's inability to obtain video evidence, an independent investigation was conducted into Restaurant Depot's safety policies.
“In addition to speaking to other attorneys throughout the Southeastern United States, we personally looked through the online court files for the jurisdiction where each Restaurant Depot was located,” Josephs said. “When online access wasn't available, we had investigators visit the clerk in the jurisdiction in order to review the docket and every negligence complaint against Restaurant Depot.”
Following a court order to disclose all forklift-related accidents in the last five years, Restaurant Depot revealed that four had taken place. According to Josephs, it quickly became clear through his investigation this was “a gross understatement” of the true number of incidents.
“There were more than 15 prior forklift accidents involving customers that should have been disclosed,” he said. “In most negligence cases involving retailers, the occurrence of prior accidents in other store locations is not relevant to the issues in the subject case. In our case, we were able to demonstrate to the court that the history of prior forklift accidents around the country was highly relevant to a number of issues. Not only the negligence of Restaurant Depot in creating flawed polices and procedures, but its reckless disregard of its customer safety in light of the history of prior forklift accidents, which we believe would entitle the plaintiff to assert a claim for punitive damages.”
After the discovery of additional accidents, Restaurant Depot admitted to liability. The court then entered an order granting sanctions against the defendant, as well as awarding Maurici attorney fees.
The defendant responded to these orders — as well as an order requiring Restaurant Depot to disclose every forklift accident around the U.S. for the previous decade — with a challenge at the Third District Court of Appeals. Following a temporary stay, the Third DCA denied Restaurant Depot's petition for certiorari.
With the three motions pending, the parties reached a $1.1 million settlement on the eve of trial.
“I have no way of knowing whether Restaurant Depot has learned from this accident and made adjustments to its internal policies to better protect its customers,” Josephs said. “However, given the number of accidents and the manner in which its policies were created and are implemented, it seems as though they treat forklift accidents as nothing more than a cost of doing business.”
He added, “I suspect it is only a matter of time before they are punished by a jury with punitive damages.”
Resnick & Louis attorney Carolina Santangelo helped represent Restaurant Depot but declined to comment. Co-counsel Rob Squire, also of Resnick & Louis, did not respond to requests for comment.
Case: Antonio Maurici & Rosa Marie Maurici v. Jetro Restaurant Depot d/b/a Restaurant Depot and Moises De La Cruz Case No.: 2017-027744-CA-01 Description: Premises liability / forklift accident Filing date: Dec. 4, 2017 Settlement: Dec. 4, 2018 Judge: Judge Spencer Eig Plaintiff attorney: Adam C. Josephs, The Josephs Law Firm, Coral Gables Defense attorney: Carolina Santangelo and Rob Squire, Resnick & Louis PC Settlement Amount: $ 1.1 million
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250