E-Commerce Threatening Shopping Plazas? Not in These Palm Beach County Markets
A Miami team from HFF has brokered the sale of three shopping plazas in Wellington and Royal Palm Beach for a combined $65 million since the beginning of the year.
February 26, 2019 at 02:40 PM
4 minute read
A Miami-based HFF team has brokered the sale of three Palm Beach County shopping plazas since the beginning of the year after years of talk about the e-commerce threat to brick-and-mortar retail.
In the latest transaction, Centre at Wellington Green Ltd. sold The Pointe at Wellington Green to Pointe at Wellington LLC for $43 million. The buyer financed the purchase with a $13.5 million loan, a deal HFF also brokered.
HFF senior managing director and retail group leader Daniel Finkle, managing director Luis Castillo and director Eric Williams represented the seller. HFF director Maxx Carney and associate Matt McCormack, also based in Miami, represented the buyer in securing the loan Feb. 14.
“The combination of having a great gym operator and having a high concentration of well-known and well-established restaurants drives a tremendous amount of traffic to this shopping center and all of its tenants benefit as a result,” Finkle said.
When consumers can easily order goods online, offering experiential retail such as restaurants and services is key for the survival of shopping plazas.
The 107,368-square-foot shopping center is anchored by an LA Fitness. Other tenants include Saito's Japanese Steakhouse, Five Guys, Jamba Juice, Olive Garden, Don Ramon Cuban Cuisine and Franco Italian Bistro and Sports Clips Haircuts. The Pointe at Wellington is 96 percent occupied.
But it's not just the dining and services that helped the plaza stay competitive and fetch $400 per square foot.
The plaza sits on 21.3 acres at 10100 Forest Hill Blvd. at the southwest corner of Forest Hill Boulevard and State Road 7 in Wellington.
That's a conspicuous location in an affluent community with about 100,000 cars driving through the intersection daily. The average household income within a three-mile radius is $117,014 per year, according to HFF.
More than 10 potential buyers made offers.
“It was a very strong response in line with our expectations for this type of property in a great submarket like Wellington,” Finkle said.
Principal Real Estate Investors, a real estate investment group in Iowa-based Principal Global Investors, issued the acquisition financing — a 13-year, fixed-rate loan at an undisclosed rate.
The same HFF team closed two other shopping plaza sales in January on behalf of the same seller.
The Plaza at Wellington Green at 2205 South State Road 7 just east of The Pointe at Wellington sold for $18 million.
Village Shoppes II on 441 at 10477 Southern Blvd. in Royal Palm Beach sold for $4 million.
The seller used different affiliates to own and dispose of each property. It used Centre at Wellington Green for The Pointe at Wellington, Centre II on 441 LLLP for Village Shoppes II on 441 and Plaza at Wellington Green Owners LLC for The Plaza at Wellington Green.
Finkle declined to disclose the name of the company behind the affiliates.
The sales speak of the health of the Wellington/Royal Palm Beach submarket. Rental rates stood at an average $20.01 per square foot triple net in the fourth quarter. That's more than West Palm Beach but behind Jupiter, Boynton Beach-Lantana and the Boca Raton North and West submarkets, according to a Colliers International report.
Still, both Wellington and Royal Palm Beach have been experiencing healthy retail transactions, including other sales in late 2018.
The 207,030-square-foot Shoppes at Isla Verde at 960 South State Road 7 in Wellington traded for $73.75 million, and the 305,611-square-foot Village Shoppes next to Village Shoppes II at 441 in Royal Palm Beach traded for $20.58 million.
“Investor interest and tenant performance varies by submarket, but on the whole South Florida tends to outperform,” Finkle said. “The Wellington submarket has seen great population growth, and retailers and restaurants there tend to perform particularly well.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250