Coral Gables Litigator Notches $10 Million Verdict Against RJ Reynolds
The plaintiffs attorney, Richard Diaz, quipped that the six-day trial might have been the shortest ever for an Engle progeny case.
February 27, 2019 at 04:06 PM
4 minute read
A Florida jury handed a $10 million verdict against R.J. Reynolds in Florida's Second Judicial Circuit on Tuesday.
The tobacco company faced claims from plaintiff Margaret Harris, alleging liability for her husband Richard's stomach cancer and ensuing pain, suffering and death. Although the jury decided the defendant was 70 percent at fault for the late Harris' ailments, attorney Richard Diaz said the plaintiff will still collect the full amount of the $10 million verdict because the jury found an intentional tort.
The jury gave $4 million in compensation and $6 million in punitive damages for a total of $10 million. Diaz said. But the final judgment is set to exceed $15 million with the addition of attorney fees and costs, the plaintiff made an offer to settle, but the defense refused, the Coral Gables litigator said.
None of the Jones Day attorneys retained by R.J. Reynolds — Emily Baker, Brad Harrison, Joyce McKinniss and James Browning — replied to requests for comment by press time. But in court pleadings, they argued that the plaintiff's request for admission was vague, and that the plaintiff's descriptions of R.J. Reynolds' products as “very addictive” and able to “change the brain” of consumers were overly ambiguous.
According to Diaz, Harris' husband was born in 1932 and began smoking when he was given free cigarettes at a drug store near his local Norfolk, Virginia, school. Prior to his death in 2016, “he smoked R.J. Reynolds products his entire life,” the attorney said.
“He was very poor, to the extent he lied at age 14 to get into the military,” Diaz said. “He joined the U.S. military. About four months later he was honorably discharged after they learned of his underage status.”
Diaz opted to amend the complaint to remove a wrongful death claim. He figured that because Harris' husband lived for 23 years after having his stomach removed due to cancer, a wrongful death charge would be vulnerable to attack by opposing counsel.
“We strategically decided to knock out the wrongful death and go with survival only, and it proved to be the right decision,” he said.
Diaz said the defense tried to portray Harris' husband as a “bad guy,” released from prison in 1985 following a 10-year prison sentence for issuing bad checks. And ironically, the testimony of former inmate Michael Capers might have been instrumental in swaying the jury.
“Richard spent the rest of his years going back to prisons doing ministry work and helping inmates reform as [he] had reformed,” Diaz said. Capers “was a stellar trial witness — he got the jury to understand despite Harris' earlier crimes and convictions, he was a truly reformed person. And today Michael Capers is a quite successful businessman, and he talked about how he credits his business success to the teachings he got from Richard Harris.”
Read the deposition:
Diaz described the trial as “fast-paced,” and quipped it was perhaps the shortest trial for an Engle progeny case in Florida history.
“The case was done in six days — the last one I did was five months,” he said. “I've never tried one in less than three weeks.”
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250