Florida Lawsuit Accuses Massage Envy of Failing to Protect Patrons From Sexual Assault
The Feb. 25 complaint names a male massage therapist as the perpetrator of an alleged November 2016 assault on the plaintiff.
February 27, 2019 at 10:14 AM
5 minute read
A new lawsuit has accused Massage Envy of negligence in vetting its employees and ensuring the safety of its customers.
The complaint filed Monday in Miami-Dade Circuit Court names the nationwide massage therapy chain as a defendant.
The plaintiff, who's listed as a Jane Doe, claims she was sexually assaulted Nov. 11, 2016, while visiting a Massage Envy location in Coral Gables. According to the suit, the attacker was a male therapist who sexually touched her during the spa treatment.
Plaintiff counsel Alex Arteaga-Gomez, of Coral Gables law firm Grossman Roth Yaffa Cohen, said his client reported the attack four days after it occurred. However, Massage Envy allegedly did little to rectify the situation.
“There's an incident report they prepared — it is a whitewash,” Arteaga-Gomez said. “It does not accurately reflect her account. She was assured they would take proper action against that individual. Whatever they did do, they did not terminate him.” The suit alleges the masseur “committed another sexual assault on another female client at the same franchise location” just months later.
Read the complaint:
Massage Envy said in a statement Tuesday that it does not comment on specific litigation, but is committed “to promoting a safe environment for members, guests and service providers at each of our 1,200 franchise locations nationwide.”
“We urge anyone that experiences anything other than a safe, quality massage to report it immediately to the franchise location so that it can be investigated,” the statement read. “We support the decision of any victim to report misconduct and it is the policy of Massage Envy to require its franchisees to supply any guest who claims to be a victim of sexual misconduct with the contact information of local law enforcement and the state board.”
The statement added Massage Envy requires its franchises to “report to law enforcement when required by law,” as well as provide information about access to RAINN, the Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network's sexual assault hotline.
“Based on the guidance from leading experts, including RAINN, the largest anti-sexual violence organization in the US, it is our policy to respect the victim's privacy and the victim's right to decide whether they would like to report to law enforcement, the state board, or anyone else,” the statement continued.
Meanwhile, a separate Jane Doe named the same therapist in a December 2017 lawsuit in Miami-Dade Circuit Court.
The suit is the latest in a series of lawsuits against Massage Envy and follows similar actions by other Jane Does. In a lawsuit filed in Palm Beach Circuit Court in August, for instance, 11 women accused Massage Envy of systematically downplaying sexual assault at its Florida locations.
Arteaga-Gomez said both suits accuse the franchise of failing to properly vet job applicants. In the case of his client, the complaint alleges the named therapist has a “history of domestic violence” and was arrested on felony charges of strong-arm robbery and grand theft resulting from a fight with his then-girlfriend before being hired with Massage Envy.
“That, to me, is a serious red flag,” Arteaga-Gomez said.
The newest lawsuit charges Massage Envy with one count of negligent hiring as well as negligence in its policies and training. It maintains Massage Envy “did not have reasonable policies and procedures in place to protect its guests from a sexual misconduct by a person performing massage therapy services” on its premises, and “failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that clients were sufficiently warned of and protected from foreseeable harm.”
“That is more directed at [Massage Envy's] implementation of policies and protocols that insufficiently act as a deterrent to conduct like this,” Arteaga-Gomez said. “There is a custom and practice of underplaying [sexual assault] and of protecting the company from law enforcement scrutiny. That creates the right environment for a predator to act.”
When contacted by phone the therapist said he was not aware of new allegations against him and needed to speak with his attorney before abruptly hanging up. Additional calls to his number were not answered.
Meanwhile, plaintiff's counsel is pressing the claim.
“When a woman knows she's been assaulted, she has been,” Arteaga-Gomez said. “[Massage Envy] has inadequate screening measures for looking into therapists' backgrounds. … [Assailants] know there's not going to be a serious consequence and the company's going to protect you.”
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250