Miami Lawyer Settles Rare Website Accessibility Suit With Miami-Dade Public Schools
Miami-Dade County Public Schools' websites and software weren't accessible to blind employee Janice A. Bartleson, but Miami disabilities attorrney Matthew Dietz helped negotiate a settlement agreement to change that.
February 27, 2019 at 12:16 PM
4 minute read
It's not often that an entity as large as Miami-Dade County Public Schools has the accessibility of its computer software challenged in court, but that's what blind employee Janice A. Bartleson did — and she prevailed Monday.
The school board agreed to make all current and future websites and software accessible to users with disabilities countywide, giving $100,000 to Bartleson and $150,000 in attorney fees.
Matthew Dietz, founder and litigation director at Miami's Disability Independence Group Inc. teamed with the National Federation of the Blind to negotiate the settlement for Bartleson — who's also Dietz's neighbor.
Bartleson, who has a Ph.D, is a counselor and emotional/behavioral disabilities clinician at the school. In her 27 years there, the school has become increasingly reliant on technology. For Bartleson, that's meant asking co-workers to read documents or type text for her, even taking work home so her daughter could help.
“Since employment now is so focused on what's on your computer, if you don't have access to the programs you really don't have the same opportunities others have, and you don't have the same opportunities of success that others have,” Dietz said.
Not only was it a personal frustration, but Bartleson also worried about other blind employees and students who were missing out.
“When a link, a form, a PDF is sent to you or you are asked to fill out something, you click and hope,” Bartleson said. “Sometimes the page or tab opens and you can see all of the links but you cannot open them. It is like looking in a store, seeing something you want to check out, but the door is locked and you can't get in.”
After exhausting the school's internal procedures, Bartleson filed a lawsuit in April 2018.
The school board responded with a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and argued Bartleson should have gone through a “Collective Bargaining Agreement” instead of bringing the suit.
The two parties eventually came together following court-ordered mediation.
School board attorney Walter J. Harvey and assistant attorney Sara M. Marken did not respond to requests for comment before deadline, but Dietz said he had no pushback from the board.
“They understood that there was an issue and they endeavored to fix it,” Dietz said. “This is not an expensive issue, so what it really took was getting the folks with the knowledge in there and figuring out how to do it in a cost-effective method.”
U.S. District Judge K. Michael Moore gave the green light to a consent decree Monday, dismissing the lawsuit and setting deadlines.
|
Read the full consent decree:
Dietz hopes the agreement will have broad implications, providing an incentive for contractors vying for school's attention and encouraging programmers to create accessible software packages from the get-go.
“There's no difference between this and the old-time physical barrier removal cases that were always brought,” Dietz said. “Once people know how to build something correctly they should build it correctly.”
In a statement Tuesday, president of the National Federation of the Blind Mark Riccobono said he commends the agreement.
“We look forward to our collaboration with the school board to make this a reality,” Riccobono said. “We will continue to fight for the rights of all blind employees until artificial barriers to inclusion and success no longer threaten the dignity and livelihood of blind workers.”
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTop Governor's Office Executives Drafted Letters Threatening Florida TV Stations Over Abortion Ads
3 minute readGC of Florida State Agency Steps Down After Threatening TV Stations That Aired Abortion-Rights Ad
Eleventh Circuit Rules for Moms for Liberty in Free Speech Case Against School Board
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
- 2Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 3Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
- 4Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 5Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250