Broward Sheriff's Office Settles Whistleblower Lawsuit With Deputy
Fort Lauderdale litigator Tonja Haddad Coleman represented Broward deputy Jeffrey Kogan in his suit against the Sheriff's Office. The complaint, which was filed in 2013, alleged the agency retaliated against Kogan for participating in an investigation against a Fort Lauderdale police officer.
February 28, 2019 at 03:41 PM
4 minute read
The Broward Sheriff's Office has opted to settle a long-simmering lawsuit with a deputy in its employ.
The agency reached a $390,000 settlement with Jeffrey Kogan in Broward Circuit Court on Monday. Kogan, a patrol officer who's been employed by the BSO for nearly two decades, filed suit against his employer in 2013 for allegedly retaliating against him. According to Kogan's attorney, Fort Lauderdale litigator Tonja Haddad Coleman, the conflict between the two parties began during a homicide investigation in April 2013.
“There was homicide suspect by the name of Walter Hart, and BSO Detective Kogan was the lead detective on the case,” Coleman said.
Kogan had traced the homicide suspect to a Fort Lauderdale residence and called the Fort Lauderdale Police Department for backup.
Although Fort Lauderdale officers helped to successfully capture Hart, Kogan was alarmed with the manner in which the suspect was treated after capture, according to court pleadings.
Kogan's lawsuit alleges a canine was deployed against the suspect despite “not resisting officers or being combative in any way.”
Kogan subsequently voiced his concerns about the incident to his superiors and testified about what he'd witnessed. Shortly after doing so, the detective was notified in June 2013 he'd been transferred to Pompano Beach Road Patrol, a position he's held since.
In addition to the pay cut and loss of rank, Kogan's application for the position of Sergeant was also denied. Coleman stated her client “was retaliated against for participating in the case” against the Fort Lauderdale Police officer. She added that Kogan's then-superior, recently ousted Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel, spent 25 years with the Fort Lauderdale Police Department before transferring to Broward. Many of Israel's colleagues made the switch to Broward with him.
“[Kogan] spoke out against a cop, which is never popular, but he also spoke out against a cop that was BSO's former agency for lack of a better word,” Coleman said.
Read the complaint:
|
The Broward Sheriff's Office communication staff did not respond to requests for comment by deadline.
But in court pleadings, the agency moved to dismiss the lawsuit. It contended the compensatory damages sought by Kogan were outside the scope of relief offered by Florida's Whistleblower Act. It denied the charges, maintaining Kogan's transfer was made in good faith. It also asserted it was Kogan's actions — rather than the reporting of it — that made the BSO question his readiness for a sergeant position.
The defendant's answer and affirmative defenses also alleged Kogan failed to report his concerns for 33 days following the night in question — rather than in the event information form that was produced shortly afterwards.
A verdict was reached in Kogan's favor in March 2015. However, after it was discovered a jury member's son had been previously arrested for drunk driving, the BSO successfully appealed to the Fourth District Court of Appeal for a new trial.
Following the appellate court's January 2017 order, the case had been scheduled to go to trial March 4. However, the pre-trial mediation between the two parties ultimately proved fruitful. Coleman attributes the outcome of the talks in part to the change in personnel at the Sheriff's Office, following Israel's forced removal from the BSO by Gov. Ron DeSantis.
“We were grateful the new command was considerate and professional,” Coleman said. “We were very, very happy the Sheriff's Office wanted to put this behind them and let everyone move forward in a positive manner.”
The settlement awards $100,00 in backpay to Kogan as well as $290,000 in attorney fees. Coleman said her client will remain in his patrol officer position, as he's nearing retirement and described the outcome as a “happy win.”
“[Kogan] performs his job with distinction; there's nothing in his record that's negative,” she said. “It's nice to see the command want to do right by Jeff, because he is an asset as a BSO deputy. … He's hopeful the new command won't hold this against him and his career can still flourish.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250