Brightline Makes Case for $950 Million More in Tax-Exempt Bonds
But a lobbyist for Indian River County, which continues to file legal challenges against the rail line, also briefly outlined objections of the Treasure Coast community where the trains will run without a stop on existing freight lines.
March 04, 2019 at 12:43 PM
3 minute read
Brightline rail service largely drew praise from businesses, transportation officials and communities where stops are planned during its request to issue another $950 million in tax-exempt bonds.
But a lobbyist for Indian River County, which continues to file legal challenges against the rail line, also briefly outlined objections of the Treasure Coast community where the trains will run without a stop on existing freight lines.
“Indian River County does not believe that the corporation has yet evidenced the ability and financials to undertake the issuances of $950 million in bonds,” Stephen “Pepper” Uchino, a Tallahassee lobbyist who represents the county, told the Florida Development Finance Corp. during a hearing at a Residence Inn near the Capitol.
The objection comes amid Indian River County's latest lawsuit, in which the county challenges having to pay for maintenance upgrades to railway crossings on the Florida East Coast Railway corridor that will be used by Brightline. The county argues that Brightline, which will be rebranded as “Virgin Trains USA” later this year, is not a party to its existing maintenance agreement with Florida East Coast Railway.
The FDFC is expected to take “several weeks” compiling paperwork regarding the bond request before any decision is made, officials said Friday.
Brightline, a private for-profit rail service, previously received $1.75 billion in bonds through the FDFC.
Virgin Trains USA, the rail line's new parent company, recently scrapped a plan to raise money for the northern extension through an initial public offering of stock.
The Palm Beach Post reported Feb. 18 that ridership on the Miami to West Palm Beach route is well below the 1.1 million predicted for 2018, and the company has $700 million in debt.
But Brightline President Patrick Goddard said numbers for commuter and business travelers have shown “strong growth,” and the bonds, which are not guaranteed by the state, will allow the company to continue construction between West Palm Beach and Orlando.
“Our expansion from South Florida to Orlando is shovel ready, construction contracts have been bid and awarded, and we've received all material approvals,” Goddard told the panel Friday.
The company anticipates the northern extension will cost about $1.9 billion and, once started, will take about three years to complete, he said.
The bonds will be used for improvements in Orange, Brevard, Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties, which Goddard said also should see economic benefits of the new service.
Among those speaking on behalf of Brightline, MetroPlan Orlando Executive Director Gary Huttmann said an efficient transportation system is critical to the region's economic prosperity.
“They have a potential to serve as a model to the rest of the nation on developing express inter-city rail,” Huttmann said. “We're especially interested in Brightline's potential to connect Central Florida to Miami and its potential to connect our SunRail passenger train system to the Orlando International Airport.”
Brightline was recently granted a 90-day extension to continue negotiating with the Florida Department of Transportation and the Central Florida Expressway Authority on using land along Interstate 4 that could be used to link the service between Orlando and Tampa.
Jim Turner reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Year-End Tax Planning: How Real Estate Investors Can Leverage Qualified Opportunity Funds
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Class Action Filed Against Houston Health Savings Account Firm for Allegedly Confiscating Client Funds
- 2These 2 Lawyers Just Became Florida Judges
- 3'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
- 4Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 5Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250