In Post-Parkland Florida, Lawmakers File Dozens of Gun Bills
In the weeks leading up to the legislative session, about 50 gun-related bills were filed: from a Republican-sponsored repeal of gun restrictions enacted after the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School massacre to a Democrat-sponsored bills to ban assault rifles.
March 04, 2019 at 12:30 PM
5 minute read
Lawmakers quickly passed new gun restrictions last year in the wake of the Parkland high school shootings that left 17 dead, but the debate about guns is far from over as the Legislature begins its 60-day session on Tuesday.
In the weeks leading up to the session, about 50 gun-related bills were filed: from a Republican-sponsored repeal of gun restrictions enacted after the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School massacre to a Democrat-sponsored bills to ban assault rifles.
But the GOP-controlled Legislature is unlikely to embrace extremes on either side of the gun issue; changes to the state's gun laws will likely be somewhere in between. Republican Rep. Mike Hill understands the atmosphere, which is why he pulled his bill to repeal provisions of last year's school safety act that raised the minimum age to buy a rifle to 21 and created a waiting period to purchase the weapons.
“It became obvious to me that the tragedy of that shooting was a wound that is still too raw to try to pull that Band-Aid off of at this time. The bill wasn't getting traction,” Hill said.
“I am always going to be a staunch supporter of our Second Amendment rights, and there could be a time in the future when my bill, or something similar to it, can be reintroduced.”
One bill that is moving forward is an expansion of a new law that allows some teachers to carry guns in schools if they go through training with their local sheriff's department and pass background and psychological tests. The bill would allow all teachers to be eligible for the program. Current law only makes teachers with roles outside the classroom eligible, such as a teacher who is also an athletic coach or oversees a drama club.
Still, Democrats aren't giving up on new gun restrictions. Most, or all, are unlikely to pass. While the Republican-dominated Legislature made rare concessions last year after the Parkland shootings, most are sticking to the pro-gun rights agenda for which the party is known.
Democratic Rep. Richard Stark realizes new restrictions such as the assault rifle ban will be a tough sell.
“I don't think that has a chance of going anywhere,” Stark said. “The gun lobby is just too strong on that.”
Instead, he's seeking some tweaks to the school safety act that he thinks could earn some Republican support. That includes expanding the so-called red flag provision that allows law enforcement to get court orders to take guns away from people seen to be a threat to themselves and others.
He wants family members and roommates to also be able to petition courts in the same situations. The bill would also prohibit someone from keeping a gun at home if that person lives with someone whose access to guns has been taken away, unless the gun is locked up, dismantled, or has a trigger lock.
“I'm not trying to take away gun rights,” he said. “We're just trying to have more safety in the streets and in the homes.”
Here's a look at other gun bills being considered in 2019 on both sides of the political aisle:
Republican-sponsored bills would:
• Allow concealed weapon permit holders to carry guns on college campuses.
• Allow private and religious schools to authorize people to carry guns on campus.
• Allow doctors and paramedics to carry guns while responding with law enforcement teams to dangerous situations such as sniper attacks, active shooter situations, and hostage standoffs. It would give them the same immunities and privileges as law enforcement officers.
• Exempt law enforcement officers from gun-purchase waiting periods.
Democratic-sponsored bills would:
• Ban large-capacity magazines.
• Require all sales or transfers of firearms to be conducted through a licensed dealer and subject to a background check.
• Make it illegal for minors to post photos of themselves holding guns on social media.
• Create a task force to make recommendations on reducing urban gun violence.
• Extend a ban on felon gun possession to people convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence and hate crimes.
• Ban nonmetal guns made from 3-D printed instructions.
• Make it illegal to fire a gun on private property if the bullet crosses property lines.
• Reduce the number of years a concealed weapon permit is valid from seven to four.
• Add performing arts centers to the list of places where guns are prohibited.
Brendan Farrington reports for the Associated Press.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
St. Thomas University Settles With Fired Professor Who Had Alleged Academic Freedom Violations and Discrimination
9 minute readEx-St. Thomas Univ. Law Professor Sues School Over Firing, Alleging Defamation
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250