South Florida Lawyers Land $8 Million Verdict Over Flea Market's 'Dangerous Patrons'
Boca Raton lawyers Kenneth J. Ronan and Anthony D. Brown argued that the negligence of former flea market owners GFM Operations Inc. set a chain of events in motion, leading their client to shoot a man who attacked him, be arrested for attempted murder and serve more than a year in jail, where he was beaten by inmates.
March 04, 2019 at 02:47 PM
6 minute read
Kenneth J. Ronan and Anthony D. Brown of Lavalle, Brown & Ronan in Boca Raton obtained an $8 million jury verdict for their client Oswaldo Jason Archibald, who was attacked at a pool hall in an Opa-locka flea market.
Archibald claimed that because the flea market's former owners GFM Operations Inc. failed to intervene, he had to defend himself, shooting his attacker and serving more than a year in jail before his case was dismissed.
It began on the evening of May 25, 2014, when Archibald was playing pool in the Northwest 42nd Avenue flea market with Rolando Urritia, but according to the complaint, friendly competition morphed into fiery conflict. Urritia later banished Archibald from the table and then intentionally bumped him, according to the complaint.
Urritia then started a game with friend Rosales Criaco and began arguing with Archibald, according to the complaint. The pair allegedly cornered him between a pillar and a pool table and refused to move, then Urritia hit Archibald on the head with a pool ball.
When several other men joined the fray, Archibald took out his gun and shot Urritia — an action he claimed was protected by Florida's “stand your ground” law. Archibald then sped off in his car, but he wasn't alone. Urritia's acquaintances tailed him, bumped and shot at his car until they eventually dispersed, according to the complaint.
Opa-locka police officers eventually caught up to Archibald, arresting and charging him with attempted murder. The way plaintiff lawyer Ronan sees it, Archibald didn't instigate the fight, yet suffered the worst consequences.
“In that attack he was physically hurt and then, ironically, he's the one that ends up getting arrested,” Ronan said.
The state eventually entered a nolle prosequi, formally abandoning the case on Aug. 10, 2015 — the day of Archibald's trial — but by then he'd served 14 months in jail and been seriously injured by inmates, according to the complaint.
|
Click here to read the complaint
Archibald sued GFM in February 2018, claiming that it had ample chance to prevent or monitor the conflict but didn't.
Ronan and Brown claimed the company should have known such an incident was likely, as it wasn't the first to happen in and around the flea market, which “attracted dangerous patrons that often incited criminal activity,” according to the complaint.
They also argued GFM should have warned guests of that risk and didn't have adequate security staff, surveillance cameras or proper lighting.
The initial assault was the catalyst for a multitude of injuries, according to Brown, as Archibald crashed his car during the chase and police officers allegedly severely beat him during his arrest.
“Then while in jail, as a result of the wrongful arrest, he was attacked by an inmate and suffered some serious injuries to his face, had stitches in his mouth and was knocked out as a result,” Brown said.
While negligent security defendants commonly argue that they're not responsible for patrons' actions, GFM never responded to the lawsuit and defaulted. The company has since filed for bankruptcy, according to online case files, and was unreachable as it's listed number is no longer in operation.
In return, Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Barbara Areces entered a default judgment against the company, finding it liable for negligence and asking a jury to decipher damages.
Although a jury trial was akin to ”one hand clapping,” Ronan said it remained the best option for his client.
“You have to go through the process,” Ronan said. “With summary judgments, you really don't know where you're going to go. This way, it looks more like justice occurred. A jury heard the evidence and a jury decided. Not one person, but six.”
|
More verdicts: How South Florida Lawyers Landed $21.5 Million for Woman Forced to Work Sundays
|
'Life-devastating'
At trial, Archibald told jurors how his life had changed since that night at the flea market. For more than 10 years, he'd been a safety technician for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, an independent government agency that oversees power plants.
“He'll never work in the same position he held because the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is a 'one strike, you're done' agency,” Brown said.
Archibald's felony arrest charges and yearlong gap in employment proved crippling to his job search, according to Ronan and Brown, who asked the jury for $10 million in damages.
“He made a lot of money doing that and he started as a young man,” Ronan said. “But he's not been able to regain footing in a career that reached the parity of the job he had with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.”
After searching high and low for a new career, Archibald moved to Alaska where he works as a construction supervisor, according to his attorneys. His jail term also took him away from his wife and four children, who relied on him for financial and emotional support, and had to move to a homeless shelter while he was gone.
“He was the provider for the family, then instantaneously was gone,” Ronan said. ”It was life-devastating in every sense of the word.”
The jury ultimately awarded just shy of the plaintiff's requested compensation for pain and suffering, medical expenses and loss of earnings, assigning $3 million in past damages and $5 million in future damages.
According to Ronan and Brown, the verdict has provided some closure for Archibald, though he still struggles with what happened and intends to file suit against the Opa-locka Police Department.
Case: Oswaldo Jason Archibald v. GFM Operations
Case no.: 2018-003644-CA-01
Description: Negligent security, premises liabilty
Filing date: Feb. 2, 2018
Verdict date: Jan. 22, 2019
Judge: Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Barbara Areces
Plaintiffs attorneys: Kenneth J. Ronan and Anthony D. Brown, Lavalle, Brown & Ronan, Boca Raton
Defense attorneys: Default
Verdict amount: $8 million
More verdict stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllArt of the Settlement: Trump Attorney Reveals Strategy in ABC Lawsuit
Nurse Awarded $2.3M in Orlando Crash Case After Declining $50K Settlement Offer
Trump, ABC News Settle Defamation Lawsuit Before Depositions
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250