Ousted Sheriff Scott Israel Asks Court to Weigh Governor's Power to Remove Him
The lawsuit filed Thursday in Broward Circuit Court alleges DeSantis' suspension of Israel via executive order overstepped his gubernatorial powers.
March 07, 2019 at 03:08 PM
5 minute read
Ousted Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel Thursday filed a petition for writ of quo warranto, challenging Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' authority to remove him from office.
The filing alleges DeSantis improperly used his gubernatorial authority to suspend Israel from the Broward Sheriff's Office through an executive order issued Jan. 11.
“Governor DeSantis exceeded his constitutional authority in suspending Sheriff Israel for political reasons not within the scope of the constitutional suspension prerogative,” the motion said. “Absent compliance with the strict limits of the suspension authority, the governor's suspension of an elected official is an affront to the Florida Constitution and the fundamental right of voters to choose their elected officials.”
The lawsuit argues DeSantis' grounds for stripping Israel of his post fall outside the constraints of Article IV, Section 7 of the Florida Constitution, which outlines the conditions by which a Florida governor can remove a public official.
“The governor may only suspend an elected official for acts or omissions that objectively — not subjectively or politically — demonstrate the official committed malfeasance, misfeasance, neglect of duty, drunkenness, incompetence or demonstrated permanent inability to perform official duties, or commission of a felony,” the suit said.
The executive order removing Israel from his post cited the “demonstrated neglect of duty and incompetence” shown in the Broward Sheriff Office's response to the mass shootings at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport in January 2017 and the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on Feb. 14, 2018.
DeSantis' communications director Helen Aguirre Ferré echoed the executive order in a statement Thursday.
“In accordance with his Florida constitutional authority, Gov. Ron DeSantis suspended Sheriff Scott Israel for neglect of duty and incompetence in executing his statutory duties as sheriff of Broward County,” Aguirre Ferré said. “It is lamentable that Scott Israel refuses to be held accountable for his actions and continues to hold disregard for the law.”
Israel's lawsuit describes DeSantis' order as “abjectly political” and claims it represents the fulfillment of a campaign promise, as well as ”the governor's dissatisfaction with policy decisions of the Broward Sheriff's Office, and operational actions with which the governor disagrees.”
“The executive order … offers no objective factual predicate for concluding Sheriff Israel neglected a 'duty' of office or incompetently performed an identified duty,” the complaint said. “Sheriff Israel cannot be suspended from office as a political ploy because the governor deems the suspension of the democratically elected sheriff to be a convenient fulfillment of a campaign promise and to satisfy the National Rifle Association.”
Read the petition:
The petition asks the Broward Circuit Court to require DeSantis “to demonstrate both his authority and the jurisdictional basis” for his contentious order.
“The Florida judiciary is well-equipped to test the very foundation for a governor's exercise of the limited constitutional suspension authority,” the suit said.
The filing adds that gubernatorial suspensions usually prompt action from the Florida Senate to gauge whether a public official's removal is proper.
“That process, however, is a political one, not bound by any considerations of fairness or due process, resulting in the ability of the governor, in tandem with a legislature of the same political majority, to truncate the term of a good-serving public official for political reasons, all without even a modicum of judicial review,” the suit said.
The lawsuit contends Israel is “entitled to reinstatement as Broward County Sheriff” and asks the court to award fees and costs. Israel's attorney, Miami civil litigator Benedict “Ben” Kuehne, said Thursday, “voters of Broward County are entitled to decide who their sheriff is by election.”
“Because the governor's suspension order was made for blatantly political and partisan reasons, as shown by the governor's comments during his State of the State speech, it is apparent there is no constitutional basis for Sheriff Israel's suspension,” he said.
Kuehne characterized DeSantis' order as an “illegal use of power he does not possess” and maintained “voters have spoken overwhelmingly in Sheriff Israel's favor.”
Israel is not the first to take legal action over DeSantis' executive orders removing Florida officials. On Friday, Mary Beth Jackson, the former superintendent of schools for Okaloosa County, filed an emergency petition for writ of quo warranto with the Florida Supreme Court. The high court issued an order on Tuesday requiring DeSantis to respond by March 20.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Business Breakups: Why Business and Commercial Cases Are Well-Suited to Mediation
- 2Prosecutors Drop Charges Against Ex-Miami Commissioner and Attorney
- 3Pennsylvania Modernizes Trust Administration With New Directed Trust Statute
- 4Farella Hires Former AUSA, Jan. 6 Prosecutor
- 5Dougherty Jury Returns $2M Verdict
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250