Cryptocurrency Option for Buying Into Miami's WeWork Building
Inveniam Capital Partners is seeking $65.5 million to buy the 17-story Miami WeWork building, and cryptocurrency is an investment option.
March 11, 2019 at 03:38 PM
6 minute read
Downtown Miami's WeWork building and a 469-unit apartment development on Florida's Gulf Coast soon will be open to investors — including those trading in cryptocurrency.
It's an innovative offering that allows investors to buy limited partnership interest in projects and tokenizes their ownership. Unlike traditional offerings, proof of ownership is a token, and investors can trade it for dollars or cryptocurrency.
“This is brand new in capital markets transactions where the actual data is maintained electronically,” said Pat O'Meara, who leads the New York company offering the investment. “The way people evidence that ownership is through that token in their wallet. Their token represents their ownership, but anything that comes to them, we will pay them in dollars or if they want a different currency, they can get paid in cryptocurrency.
Inveniam Capital Partners is seeking $270 million for four projects. It plans to hold an auction giving cryptocurrency bidders three hours to submit blind offers. The auction date has not been announced.
Few commercial real estate deals have been done this way and even fewer on this scope. Holders of Bitcoin, Litecoin and other types of digital money can put their funds into a hard asset, said O'Meara, chairman and CEO of debt capital markets firm Inveniam.
Two Fort Lauderdale attorneys, however, advised a cautious approach, especially in light of the novelty and past occurrences of cryptocurrency fraud.
“It's hard to be the first to market, and this is one of the first and largest projects that is trying to tokenize real estate and infrastructure investments. Until I see regulators and institutions investing without problems, I am going to be slow to endorse the investment platform, and I continue to be hesitant in my recommendation,” said David Silver, a founding partner at Silver Miller. “I am more cautious than not given what I do for a living, especially in the cryptocurrency space.”
He noted “fad investing” hurt some early cryptocyrrency investors. citing a BitConnect class action.
Jesse Fulton, an attorney at Krupnick Campbell Malone Buser Slama Hancock, said he would suggest coming in “very, very, very cognizant of what you are entering into.”
Still, there are aspects of the Inveniam offering that speak well of it, Fulton and Silver added. For one, the company is publicizing rather than hiding its offering.
The minimum investment is $500,000, which generally limits it to institutional investors, Silver added.
“I am happy to see that this is happening because I want sophisticated investors who understand how to do due diligence into projects like this to be the ones starting out the investment process,” he said.
Inveniam, which has done several smaller cryptocurrency deals, will be the general partner in each project, where cash also is an option.
|The Projects
Inveniam has the 96,575-square-foot historic Miami tower at 117 NE First Ave. fully leased by WeWork under contract to buy it from Security Building AR Owner LLC.
“What we are doing now is we are going to get partners who are going to help us close that deal,” O'Meara said.
Dade County Security Corp., an early 1900s savings and loan, developed the building in 1926 after demolishing a hotel to make room for the 17-story tower in response to an uptick in demand, according to Miami-History.com. The Security Building name was inscribed on the building, which was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1989.
Inveniam is seeking $65.5 million covering the $61.65 million purchase price and $3.85 million for associated transaction costs and potential emergency maintenance.
Inveniam also is seeking $75 million for the development of a 469-unit multifamily community on Florida's West Coast. Some of the funds could be leveraged to build two more multifamily projects, O'Meara said.
“Once you have one up and running, you have the ability to utilize leverage and add leverage onto the trade so you can do up to three transactions,” he said.
Inveniam and North Dakota-based developer Roers Development LLC will be the general partners. The investment breaks down to $50 million in debt and $25 million in equity, or $160,000 per unit. That's how much it's costing Roers to build another 320-unit project in Cape Coral.
Inveniam also is looking for $80 million to buy three student housing projects from Roers in Fargo. The projects, which mainly serve North Dakota State University, are the 233-unit, 420-bed U32; the 180-unit, 359-bed T Lofts Apartments; and the 75-unit, 138-bed SGC Apartments. Roers intends to continue managing the properties.
In its fourth offering, Inveniam is seeking $50 million to refinance existing debt and help pay for the 19-mile expansion of a Williston, North Dakota, water pipeline.
Inveniam is making a de minimus investment in the projects, O'Meara said.
|The Process
Once bids come in, Inveniam will convert the tokens to cash through Grapefruit Trading, which provides liquidity for cryptocurrencies, and invest in the four projects. The investors' stake is tokenized, leaving proof of ownership in a digital wallet.
“This tokenized interest will be sent back to their wallet. That's an about a 15-minute process,” O'Meara said.
Manuel Crespo, Inveniam's attorney on parts of the transaction, said the offering will be a good deal for investors who get “two bites of the apple.”
Funds go into a stable, income-producing asset, then investors can sell their tokens at a favorable exchange rate between cryptocurrency and dollars, said Crespo, a Greenspoon Marder partner in Miami.
O'Meara said this type of offering might make investing more accessible to people who want to invest but don't have access to institutional investments. He hopes this structure eventually could connect borrowers with investors in off-the-beaten-path places.
“Think all through Middle America, think Central and South America, think Eastern Europe, places where debt is mispriced because their connectivity to big money centers is less,” O'Meara said. “That's what this is setting the table for.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Cyberattacks Slowing Down M&A Deals, Firm Report Finds
- 2$10 Million Settlement Reached for Baby Injured by Disconnected Ventilator
- 3King & Spalding Leaves Texas Patent Case After Client Stops Paying
- 4Knowable Launches Generative AI-Powered Tool Suite Ask Knowable
- 5Pike Fuels Agrees to Pay $2 Million Settlement to Resolve Alleged New Haven Environmental Violations
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250