South Florida Lawyers Land Bruising $37 Million Verdict Against Cigarette Makers
Attorneys at the Schlesinger Law Offices convinced a Broward County jury to award $25 million in punitive and $12 million in compensatory damages to the family of Rita Mahfuz, who died of lung cancer after a lifetime of smoking R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris cigarettes.
March 11, 2019 at 12:43 PM
4 minute read
A team of lawyers at the Schlesinger Law Offices convinced a Broward County jury to award $37 million in damages to the family of lifelong smoker Rita Mahfuz, who died of lung cancer in 1999.
Steven J. Hammer, Brittany Chambers, Jonathan R. Gdanski and Scott P. Schlesinger argued that tobacco giants R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. and Philip Morris USA Inc. used misleading ads to prey on people like Mahfuz, who was just 13 when she picked up her first pack.
Mahfuz died at 53 — a young age to suffer from lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a lung disease that blocks airways and causes wheezing. The team estimates jurors were likely struck by Mahfuz's early death and back story.
Mahfuz's husband, Richard, brought the original lawsuit in 2007 blaming the tobacco corporations for her early death. His wife had often smoked Winston cigarettes, owned by R.J. Reynolds, and Virginia Slims, owned by Philip Morris.
Richard Mahfuz was lost without his wife, according to Hammer, as they were childhood sweethearts.
“They didn't have much, but whatever they had they gave to their kids and made sure that they had a good life together,” Hammer said. “When they finally got to the age where they could retire, she died.”
The case is one of thousands of similar suits emanating from a 2016 Florida Supreme Court ruling that overturned a $145 billion verdict against Big Tobacco and gave the go-ahead for 700,000 other individuals to bring similar cases in future.
As with any Engle progeny trial, the plaintiff had to convince a jury that the smoker's nicotine addiction was the legal cause of a smoking-related ailment.
Click here to read the complaint
Jurors found the cigarette makers bore 90 percent of the blame for Mahfuz's death — 45 percent each — awarding $12 million in compensatory damages and $25 million in punitive damages.
Kathryn S. Lehman and Jeffrey L. Furr of King Spalding's Atlanta and Charlotte offices represented R.J. Reynolds, while Hildy Sastre of Shook, Hardy & Bacon in Miami represented Philip Morris. They did not respond to requests for comment before deadline.
Philip Morris and R. J Reynolds denied liability, arguing at trial that Mahfuz's lung cancer wasn't directly linked to cigarettes and challenging the notion that she was addicted to smoking.
Related story: Fort Lauderdale Lawyers Win $6.5 Million Over Smoker's Radiation Death
Though $37 million is a hefty verdict, in Hammer's eyes it does little to rectify the damage.
“These companies make $10 million to $15 million a day,” Hammer said. “So in the scheme of things it wasn't really much of a penalty to them. They lost maybe a day's worth of profit for killing somebody.”
In Gdanski's view, there's no more important industry to hold accountable today.
“It can send a message to other industries that if you behave as a corporate citizen the way they did, then at some point, either through regulation or litigation, you can be held accountable,” Gdanski said. “That's a meaningful message to have out there when, unfortunately, there are opportunities for powerful industries to run amuck.”
More Engle progeny stories:
Philip Morris' 'Militant Resistance' Revealed in Fee Fight Documents
'We Are Outraged': This South Florida Firm is Winning Millions of Dollars Against Big Tobacco
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Brought Under NYC Gender Violence Law, Ruling Claims Barred Under State Measure
No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
5 minute readSecond DCA Greenlights USF Class Certification on COVID-19 College Tuition Refunds
3 minute readFlorida Law Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Orrick Loses 10-Lawyer Team to Herbert Smith in Germany
- 2‘The US Market Is Critical’: KPMG’s Former Head of Global Legal Services On the Legal Arm of the Big Four Firm Entering the US
- 3Justice Marguerite Grays Elevated to Co-Chair Panel That Advises on Commercial Division
- 4McDermott Continues UK Growth With Another Partner Hire in London
- 52 Texas Lawyers Vie for Prominent Post: 2025-2026 Election
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250