State Lawmakers Look to Toughen Anti-Hazing Criminal Laws
If Sen. Lauren Book's measure is approved, prosecutors would be able to charge people who knew about hazing plans or recruited people to participate in the hazing.
March 12, 2019 at 01:36 PM
3 minute read
More than a year after a Florida State University fraternity pledge died, lawmakers are considering expanding the state's anti-hazing laws to include the prosecution of people involved in planning acts of hazing.
One of those proposals (SB 1080) was approved by its first Senate committee Monday. The Senate Criminal Justice Committee advanced the bill, which would also provide immunity to the first person who calls 911 when a hazing victim is in need of medical care.
Sen. Lauren Book, D-Plantation, is spearheading the effort in the Senate with the backing of the parents of Andrew Coffey, who died after drinking a bottle of Wild Turkey bourbon that had been taped to his hand at a Pi Kappa Phi party.
Andrew's parents, Tom and Sandy Coffey, on Monday pleaded with senators to hold leaders and members of organizations accountable by strengthening the state's hazing criminal statutes.
“Put people on notice so that they can't just do whatever they want to do without any type of consequence,” Tom Coffey said while holding back tears. “We are doing this for all the other kids. We never, ever, ever, ever want to see this repeated again.”
Under current law, a person who intentionally hazes someone, resulting in serious bodily injury or death, faces a third-degree felony charge. The proposal would add a permanent injury to the list.
Hazing includes forcing someone to drink alcohol or take drugs, sleep deprivation, whipping, branding or forcing someone to go through what could result from “extreme embarrassment.”
If Book's measure is approved, prosecutors would be able to charge people who knew about hazing plans or recruited people to participate in the hazing. Under the proposal, a person would need to cooperate with authorities after calling 911 to receive immunity from hazing charges.
Sen. Jeff Brandes, R-St. Petersburg, supported the proposal and asked Book to match the provision in her anti-hazing law with the Good Samaritan law, which gives legal protection to people who assist someone who is in danger.
“The goal here is to save lives,” Brandes said.
Coffey's death led FSU to suspend Greek life and consider reforms to combat dangerous drinking at the university.
FSU spokeswoman Browning Brooks issued a statement Monday that said the university backs tougher laws to address hazing.
“Florida State fully supports strengthening anti-hazing laws, and this is consistent with the university's many efforts to prevent such tragedies in the future,” the statement said.
David Bianchi, an attorney representing the Coffey family, told senators that more needs to be done to expand the state's anti-hazing laws, which he said have not been changed in 17 years.
“We know we need to make this good law even better,” Bianchi said.
Bianchi also shared the story of another FSU fraternity pledge, Nicholas Mauricio, who suffered a brain injury after being punched in the face during a “Scumbag of the Week” event. The 20-year-old sued Alpha Epsilon Pi for negligence.
The Senate measure needs approval from the Education and Appropriations committees before it could get a full vote on the Senate floor. A similar proposal (HB 727) was considered for the first time Tuesday in the House Criminal Justice Subcommittee.
Ana Ceballos reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
St. Thomas University Settles With Fired Professor Who Had Alleged Academic Freedom Violations and Discrimination
9 minute readEx-St. Thomas Univ. Law Professor Sues School Over Firing, Alleging Defamation
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1NASDAQ Beats Back Investor Claims of Bias Against Minority-Owned Businesses
- 2Former Google Legal Exec Joins Ad Tech Unicorn as GC
- 3Fenwick and Baker & Hostetler Add DC Partners, as Venable and Brownstein Hire Policy Advisers
- 4H&R Block Accused of Negligence in Data Breach Suit
- 5Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250