Senators Back Removing Former Justice's Name From FSU Law School
Former Florida Supreme Court Justice B.K. Roberts left a troublesome legacy when he wrote pro-segregation opinions in the 1950s.
March 13, 2019 at 01:08 PM
4 minute read
A Senate panel pushed forward a measure that would allow Florida State University to strip the name of former Florida Supreme Court Justice B.K. Roberts from a law-school building because of pro-segregation opinions written by Roberts.
While the move by the Senate Education Committee received overwhelming support from the public and lawmakers, Sen. Dennis Baxley, the lone no vote, said the measure was a “dangerous path” toward erasing the state's history.
“We are being politically correct erasers to try and make it say something different,” Baxley, R-Ocala, said. “It is what it is, and there is plenty of repentance that has been done and will be done and should be done for things that were wrong in our country.”
Roberts left a troublesome legacy when he wrote pro-segregation opinions in the 1950s. The opinions, including one that refused to obey a U.S. Supreme Court decision to allow a black man to enroll in the University of Florida College of Law, prompted an FSU advisory panel last year to recommend his name be removed from the FSU law-school building.
“To keep the name of B.K. Roberts on the law-school building would continue to honor someone whose decisions and actions do not reflect Florida State University's values or the rule of law,” FSU President John Thrasher wrote last year in response to the advisory panel recommendation.
To change the building name, FSU needs approval from the Legislature because the name was included in a 1973 law.
Tuesday's vote by the Senate Education Committee was the first legislative committee to advance that effort and came as part of a broader bill (SPB 7076) that would lead to the university system's Board of Governors establishing regulations for naming campus facilities.
Nearly 200 other university buildings across the state have been given names through legislation.
Current FSU law-school students supported the bill, saying it was embarrassing to work out of a building named after someone who contributed to the state's segregationist history.
But Baxley, an FSU graduate, said “we do not know all that happened into putting people's names up, and they are being smudged publicly when they are not even here to defend themselves.”
Thrasher, a former senator and state House speaker, last year recommended that the contributions Roberts made to the university should be recognized in an “appropriate space and manner within the law school.” But Thrasher said Roberts' name should be removed from the law-school building.
“I'm here to give you a warning,” Baxley said. “You start down this path, and someone is going to be tearing down something that represents something to you, it may not be what it represents to others, but we are destroying our own artifacts of our own history.”
Roberts helped found the law school at FSU and develop the public-defender system, Thrasher said. Roberts served on the Supreme Court from 1949 to 1976 and died in 1999.
Lori Berman, D-Lantana, supported the bill because she likes the idea of creating a process that will give colleges and universities the chance to become a more “welcoming environment.”
“I think that is where the decisions should be made,” Berman said. “I do think that the students and the faculty of those schools should be responsible for making the decisions for what they are comfortable with.”
Sen. Janet Cruz, D-Tampa, said history should not be forgotten but indicated that changes need to be considered.
“We have to provide for and make sure that we include a different world in a different era now, which is … certainly not perfect, but moving toward a more diverse America that I am proud to live in,” Cruz said.
Ana Ceballos reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami Firm Reaches $1.9M Settlement for Protester's Injuries, Pursues Class Action for Others
COVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250