Senators Back Removing Former Justice's Name From FSU Law School
Former Florida Supreme Court Justice B.K. Roberts left a troublesome legacy when he wrote pro-segregation opinions in the 1950s.
March 13, 2019 at 01:08 PM
4 minute read
A Senate panel pushed forward a measure that would allow Florida State University to strip the name of former Florida Supreme Court Justice B.K. Roberts from a law-school building because of pro-segregation opinions written by Roberts.
While the move by the Senate Education Committee received overwhelming support from the public and lawmakers, Sen. Dennis Baxley, the lone no vote, said the measure was a “dangerous path” toward erasing the state's history.
“We are being politically correct erasers to try and make it say something different,” Baxley, R-Ocala, said. “It is what it is, and there is plenty of repentance that has been done and will be done and should be done for things that were wrong in our country.”
Roberts left a troublesome legacy when he wrote pro-segregation opinions in the 1950s. The opinions, including one that refused to obey a U.S. Supreme Court decision to allow a black man to enroll in the University of Florida College of Law, prompted an FSU advisory panel last year to recommend his name be removed from the FSU law-school building.
“To keep the name of B.K. Roberts on the law-school building would continue to honor someone whose decisions and actions do not reflect Florida State University's values or the rule of law,” FSU President John Thrasher wrote last year in response to the advisory panel recommendation.
To change the building name, FSU needs approval from the Legislature because the name was included in a 1973 law.
Tuesday's vote by the Senate Education Committee was the first legislative committee to advance that effort and came as part of a broader bill (SPB 7076) that would lead to the university system's Board of Governors establishing regulations for naming campus facilities.
Nearly 200 other university buildings across the state have been given names through legislation.
Current FSU law-school students supported the bill, saying it was embarrassing to work out of a building named after someone who contributed to the state's segregationist history.
But Baxley, an FSU graduate, said “we do not know all that happened into putting people's names up, and they are being smudged publicly when they are not even here to defend themselves.”
Thrasher, a former senator and state House speaker, last year recommended that the contributions Roberts made to the university should be recognized in an “appropriate space and manner within the law school.” But Thrasher said Roberts' name should be removed from the law-school building.
“I'm here to give you a warning,” Baxley said. “You start down this path, and someone is going to be tearing down something that represents something to you, it may not be what it represents to others, but we are destroying our own artifacts of our own history.”
Roberts helped found the law school at FSU and develop the public-defender system, Thrasher said. Roberts served on the Supreme Court from 1949 to 1976 and died in 1999.
Lori Berman, D-Lantana, supported the bill because she likes the idea of creating a process that will give colleges and universities the chance to become a more “welcoming environment.”
“I think that is where the decisions should be made,” Berman said. “I do think that the students and the faculty of those schools should be responsible for making the decisions for what they are comfortable with.”
Sen. Janet Cruz, D-Tampa, said history should not be forgotten but indicated that changes need to be considered.
“We have to provide for and make sure that we include a different world in a different era now, which is … certainly not perfect, but moving toward a more diverse America that I am proud to live in,” Cruz said.
Ana Ceballos reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readAs Unpredictability Rises, Gov't Law Practices Expect Trump Bump. Especially in Florida
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250