Broward Firm Prevails Over Ex-Client in Fee Fight but Loses $28,000
The Fourth District Court of Appeal sided with Broward attorneys Justin Parafinczuk and Marcus Susen on Wednesday, but their firm lost out on $28,000 in expert witness costs.
March 14, 2019 at 02:35 PM
3 minute read
The Fourth District Court of Appeal granted Broward firm Koch Parafinczuk Wolf Susen's claim to almost $165,000 in attorney fees for a wrongful death case after ex-client Anne Marie Corominas challenged the payment. Corominas had fired the firm about eight weeks into the litigation, which later settled for $1.1 million.
It was a win for Justin Parafinczuk and Marcus Susen, but they didn't get everything they wanted.
Thursday's per curiam opinion ordered the trial court to strike $28,000 paid for expert witness Joel Perwin, an experienced Miami appellate lawyer who gave testimony to support the firm's billing, based on the amount and nature of its work.
“He's handled significant appeals including the U.S. Supreme Court, so he was not cheap, as you can see by what we paid him,” Parafinczuk said.
Corominas had claimed she didn't owe Koch Parafinczuk Wolf Susen anything, having succeeded in the litigation with other lawyers from Boca Raton firm Gold & Gold. But the Broward firm successfully struck back, calling that a bad faith position.
The trial court agreed. But the appellate court found Palm Beach Circuit Judge Thomas H. Barkdull III hadn't properly established the necessary factors that would support a bad-faith claim — meaning it couldn't stand, and the $28,000 fee fell with it.
Though the firm has already paid expert witness Perwin, Parafinczuk said it's not lost money, per se.
“It's not much different from me handling this case and taking it to trial and saying, 'OK, now I need to deduct my costs from whatever verdict there is,'” Parafinczuk said.
Parafinczuk said he and Susen still doesn't know why the client moved on but suspect it was because the new attorneys offered a lower contingency fee of 33 percent, rather than their 40 percent.
Counsel to Corominas — Philip A. Gold of Gold & Gold, and Elliot B. Kula, W. Aaron Daniel and William D. Mueller of Kula & Associates in Miami — did not respond to requests for comment before deadline.
Corominas has 15 days to file a motion for rehearing.
Parafinczuk and Susen had filed a complaint on behalf of Corominas, who sued Palm Beach limousine service company Ajay Transportation Inc. and its owner, Ajay Development Group LLC, over the death of her mother. Patrocinio R. Libre was killed in 2015 when her driver, an elderly man with a heart condition, suffered what appeared to be a heart attack, veered off the road and crashed into a tree.
But as it turns out, Parafinczuk and Susen would spend more time and energy fighting for their fees after being discharged than they did representing Corominas in the first place.
“That is the true irony,” Parafinczuk said. ”We went to several court hearings, two long evidentiary hearings that were basically mini trials and through an entire appeal to preserve our right to something that we were entitled to from the start.”
Read the full court opinion:
Related stories:
Fake South Florida Law Firm? Court Sides With AG Seeking Injunction
No Winners in Broward Battle of the Firms: $500K Participation Fee Violated Bar Rules
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Brought Under NYC Gender Violence Law, Ruling Claims Barred Under State Measure
No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
5 minute readSecond DCA Greenlights USF Class Certification on COVID-19 College Tuition Refunds
3 minute readFlorida Law Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Starbucks Sues Ex-Executive to Recover $1M Signing Bonus
- 2Navigating AI Risks: Best Practices for Compliance and Security
- 320 New Judges? Connecticut Could Get Wave of Jurists
- 4Orrick Loses 10-Lawyer Team to Herbert Smith in Germany
- 5‘The US Market Is Critical’: KPMG’s Former Head of Global Legal Services On the Legal Arm of the Big Four Firm Entering the US
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250