Broward Firm Prevails Over Ex-Client in Fee Fight but Loses $28,000
The Fourth District Court of Appeal sided with Broward attorneys Justin Parafinczuk and Marcus Susen on Wednesday, but their firm lost out on $28,000 in expert witness costs.
March 14, 2019 at 02:35 PM
3 minute read
The Fourth District Court of Appeal granted Broward firm Koch Parafinczuk Wolf Susen's claim to almost $165,000 in attorney fees for a wrongful death case after ex-client Anne Marie Corominas challenged the payment. Corominas had fired the firm about eight weeks into the litigation, which later settled for $1.1 million.
It was a win for Justin Parafinczuk and Marcus Susen, but they didn't get everything they wanted.
Thursday's per curiam opinion ordered the trial court to strike $28,000 paid for expert witness Joel Perwin, an experienced Miami appellate lawyer who gave testimony to support the firm's billing, based on the amount and nature of its work.
“He's handled significant appeals including the U.S. Supreme Court, so he was not cheap, as you can see by what we paid him,” Parafinczuk said.
Corominas had claimed she didn't owe Koch Parafinczuk Wolf Susen anything, having succeeded in the litigation with other lawyers from Boca Raton firm Gold & Gold. But the Broward firm successfully struck back, calling that a bad faith position.
The trial court agreed. But the appellate court found Palm Beach Circuit Judge Thomas H. Barkdull III hadn't properly established the necessary factors that would support a bad-faith claim — meaning it couldn't stand, and the $28,000 fee fell with it.
Though the firm has already paid expert witness Perwin, Parafinczuk said it's not lost money, per se.
“It's not much different from me handling this case and taking it to trial and saying, 'OK, now I need to deduct my costs from whatever verdict there is,'” Parafinczuk said.
Parafinczuk said he and Susen still doesn't know why the client moved on but suspect it was because the new attorneys offered a lower contingency fee of 33 percent, rather than their 40 percent.
Counsel to Corominas — Philip A. Gold of Gold & Gold, and Elliot B. Kula, W. Aaron Daniel and William D. Mueller of Kula & Associates in Miami — did not respond to requests for comment before deadline.
Corominas has 15 days to file a motion for rehearing.
Parafinczuk and Susen had filed a complaint on behalf of Corominas, who sued Palm Beach limousine service company Ajay Transportation Inc. and its owner, Ajay Development Group LLC, over the death of her mother. Patrocinio R. Libre was killed in 2015 when her driver, an elderly man with a heart condition, suffered what appeared to be a heart attack, veered off the road and crashed into a tree.
But as it turns out, Parafinczuk and Susen would spend more time and energy fighting for their fees after being discharged than they did representing Corominas in the first place.
“That is the true irony,” Parafinczuk said. ”We went to several court hearings, two long evidentiary hearings that were basically mini trials and through an entire appeal to preserve our right to something that we were entitled to from the start.”
Read the full court opinion:
|Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250