Florida's Chief Justice Addresses Incivility in the Legal Profession
Chief Justice Charles T. Canady spoke to South Florida attorney and judges Wednesday about the importance of professionalism.
March 14, 2019 at 03:00 PM
5 minute read
You don't have to look far to find incivility in contemporary American life. Some attribute the United States' not-so subtle tumult to recent events in our political realm. Others would contend we've always been this way.
Charles T. Canady, the chief justice of the Florida Supreme Court, said there's a precedent for coarseness in our country's dialogue.
“I think sometimes we can exaggerate how much civility has declined,” Canady said. “I think we need to remember that in our public life historically, bitter invective has always … or has frequently been a part of public debate.”
On Wednesday, Canady spoke with the Daily Business Review before addressing members of Florida's legal community to share his thoughts on the state of courteousness in the legal field. The talk, “Maintaining an Island of Civility: Professionalism in a Time of Incivility,” was hosted by the Stephen R. Booher Inn of Court at the Lauderdale Yacht Club.
His comments echoed a survey by the Daily Business Review that showed 91 percent of respondents felt civility — or rather a lack of it — had become a problem in the legal profession. The establishment of professionalism committees in Florida over the last decade attests to mounting concerns.
Speaking before an audience that included Broward Circuit Chief Judge Jack Tuter and Tripp Scott lawyer Charles Tatelbaum, Canady quipped that chairing such committees is often a “thankless” job. The chief justice also emphasized the need for humility in not just the courtroom, but in day-to-day interactions.
“It's easy to be civil to others who are themselves civil,” he said. “When uncivil behavior does require a response, the response can be carried out in a manner that is civil.”
Before his presentation, Canady defined civility as the ability “to rise above personality and focus on the issues.”
“If we fail to do that, then personal disputes get in the way of doing the business at hand,” he said. “It's very important for the dignity of the profession and the success of the profession — and for our service to the people we serve, our clients — that we maintain a high standard of civility.”
Canady noted the pervasiveness of irritability has sometimes resulted in attorneys acting out at the behest of those they're representing.
“Sometimes clients actually push lawyers to do things that are not civil, so that's another part of the equation,” he said. “In those circumstances I think that the lawyer has a responsibility to educate the client and help the client understand that that kind of behavior is really going to be counterproductive.”
The chief justice believes the pursuit of maintaining respect in an occupation defined by disagreements will be ongoing, regardless of the political and social climate it's taking place in.
“It's going to be a never-ending thing. There is no magic solution to the problems of incivility,” he said. Besides the short-term remedies offered through disciplinary measures, Canady called for attorneys to extend conversations about mutual respect beyond their usual social circles. In his mind, this means both within the legal profession and beyond it.
“I think sometimes people who are involved in … bar activities in general are going to be people who are sensitive to the demands of professionalism,” he said. “Whereas people who are not, many of them will also be sensitive to that … but some won't be. And so it's a question of how you get the message across to people who might not be in their local bar associations to hear what's being said.”
Following his speech, Canady was asked how this message of decency and consideration could be best spread.
“The most effective way you can preach to the choir… is by the way you conduct yourself,” he said, admitting that in these times of self-made communal bubbles, it's hard to reach those who don't want to be reached.
“That's a challenge,” he said. “I hope they can hear it.”
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
Managing Partners Survey: Tell Us How the Past Year Went
'You're in Trial. You're Sick Again': Addressing Attorney Stress
Trending Stories
- 1How My Postpartum Depression Led to Launching My Firm’s Parental Leave Coaching Program
- 2A&O Shearman's Former U.S. Co-Chair to Leave Partnership
- 3Hit Song Ignites Multimillion-Dollar Legal Battle in South Florida
- 4Miami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
- 5GE Agrees to $362.5M Deal to End Shareholder Claims Over Power, Insurance Risks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250