Bankruptcy Billing Rates See Slight Uptick, and Attorneys Note Indicators of Recession
While the Daily Business Review's annual billing rate study saw a small uptick, bankruptcy attorneys say the increase was "incidental."
March 18, 2019 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Bankruptcy attorneys, one of the legal world's earliest indicators of a recession, are starting to see the signs of change even as their billing rates remain close to flat.
Average hourly rates for the 10 highest billers in an annual review of Florida court records show an $18 increase in the last year, a change several bankruptcy attorneys consider almost negligible.
“The increase is incidental,” said Robert Furr, whose firm Furr & Cohen took the No. 4 spot on the list. “I haven't raised rates in four years. The rate of bankruptcies are still much lower than they were a decade ago.”
ALM compiles the data by collecting billing rates reported in bankruptcy filings in the North, Middle and Southern districts of Florida. The list is by no means complete since rates for many attorneys representing creditors are not listed. Rates are also influenced by factors including firm policy and geography.
Berger Singerman partner Paul Singerman said that the lack of creditor representation misses attorneys from large law firms such as Akerman, DLA Piper and White & Case, who often charge upward of $1,000 per hour.
Though rates are not exclusively tied to the volume of work, bankruptcy work is often an early indicator of the state of the economy, and attorneys and recruiters are seeing the first signs that the economy may be turning down. A Wall Street Journal survey of economists found less than half believe a recession will start in 2020, and economists have begun to greatly reduce growth forecasts in the coming years.
Bankruptcy attorney Jeffrey Bast of Bast Amron said there has been a noticeable uptick of bankruptcy filings in Delaware, a corporate and debtor-friendly jurisdiction seen by many as a bellwether for the rest of the country. Bast hasn't seen a trickle-down effect reach South Florida yet.
“Every bankruptcy filing, every default, every refusal to pay affects other businesses in a ripple effect,” he said.
Bast pointed to other economic indicators as signs of a possible recession. According to the Federal Reserve, a record 7 million Americans are three months delinquent on their car payments. The figure is 1 million higher than in 2009, the peak of the Great Recession.
CTI Foods, Z Gallerie and publisher F+W filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Delaware on March 11. The companies join a graveyard of recent large retail bankruptcies that include Sears, Toys R Us and Sports Authority.
Legal recruiter Andie Viele of Viele Consulting Group said she's seen a slight uptick in law firm demand for bankruptcy partners and associates.
“We're definitely seeing an uptick. Some clients have said, not a lot, have told me they were so busy they can't keep up,” she said.
But the economy is in a state where many firms don't want to pull the trigger on bankruptcy associate hiring yet, she said. There aren't enough clear signs, and law firms thinking of boosting their bankruptcy practices don't want to risk prematurely hiring if the workload isn't there.
“Bankruptcy is cyclical, so they don't want to overstaff during those times,” Viele said. “They are trying to be really careful.”
Wargo French bankruptcy attorney Kristopher Aungst, whose firm is No. 7 on the list, is a little more conservative. He's definitely seen an uptick in Chapter 11 cases, though they appear to be one-offs: an issue with a family or fallout from a business partner dispute.
Like Bast, he's seen an increase in work filed in Delaware. Aungst believes many of those filings can be attributed to problems in the brick-and-mortar retail industry, and he's unsure whether that will translate to South Florida anytime soon.
But Aungst said the economy is cyclical, and it would be foolish to think the economy can maintain the expansion its seen over the last decade.
“We haven't had a down cycle in a long time,” he said. “The minute you believe it won't go down, it does.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 2Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 3In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 4Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 5Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250