No New Trial for Florida Woman Caught Hiring Fake Hit Man on 'Cops' Episode
The Fourth District Court of Appeal shot down Dalia Dippolito's latest attempt to reverse her conviction for attempting to hire a hit man to kill her husband.
March 18, 2019 at 03:02 PM
4 minute read
The Fourth District Court of Appeal has doomed a request for a new trial for Dalia Dippolito, convicted in 2017 of trying to hire a hit man to kill her then-husband of six months.
Dippolito's crime was captured on an episode of the reality-TV show “Cops” in 2009, as the crew followed the Boynton Beach Police Department on the day officers told Dippolito her husband had been murdered in a home invasion.
But her spouse wasn't actually dead, because the hit man Dippolito had agreed to pay $7,000 to was an undercover agent. Dippolito's plan unraveled after her lover alerted police to her plot, and they filmed a string of incriminating meetings before staging a crime scene.
If successful, Dippolito's appeal would have led to a fourth trial, but Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal blocked that route in a roller-coaster case. Dippolito's 2011 conviction and 20-year sentence for solicitation to commit first-degree murder was overturned on appeal, while her 2016 trial resulted in a hung jury. While on house arrest awaiting her third trial, Dippolito gave birth to a son, but in 2017, she was again convicted and sentenced to 16 years in prison.
Related story: Murder-for-Hire Case Shown on 'Cops' Heads to Third Trial
Dippolito's lawyers, Greg Rosenfeld and Andrew B. Greenlee argued their client fell victim to entrapment, as police officers had worked with a TV crew to land the arrest. But the court disagreed, ruling that the government's conduct didn't so “offend decency or a sense of justice that judicial power may not be exercised to obtain a conviction.”
The court pointed to various examples where entrapment occurred, including a drug case where police encouraged an informant to gather four kilograms of cocaine within a certain time to have his sentence reduced, but it ruled Dippolito's case didn't fit.
“It was only at the point that she was being arrested, after the crime was complete, that the television program filmed the arrest,” the opinion said. “As the crime of solicitation to commit murder was completed before 'Cops' was involved, the agreement between the police and the show with respect to the filming did not constitute a due process violation.”
Rosenfeld said he will appeal the decision.
“While the defense team is extremely disappointed, we will continue to fight for Ms. Dippolito,” Rosenfeld said.
Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody and Assistant Attorney General Elba Caridad Martin represent the state, and did not respond to a request for comment by deadline.
Botched antifreeze poisoning?
The defense also claimed the court shouldn't have allowed the state to bring allegations that Dippolito had previously tried to poison her husband with antifreeze, as well as a range of bad acts the defense claimed were unsubstantiated and inadmissible.
In Dippolito's first trial, the court had branded the poisoning claim too prejudicial for jurors to hear. But the court ruled the evidence was necessary, as it came from Dippolito's lover, an important witness.
“It also explains why the lover initially approached the police—because he did actually believe appellant was going to kill her husband,” the opinion said.
The opinion also pointed out that the evidence emerged during defense counsel's cross-examination of the lover, which was aimed at showing he didn't believe Dippolito actually wanted to kill her husband.
Fourth DCA Judge Martha C. Warner wrote the opinion, with Judges Cory J. Ciklin and Spencer D. Levine.
Dippolito's release date is Aug. 24, 2032.
Read the full court opinion:
More criminal law stories:
Judge: Alex Acosta Broke the Law by Giving Jeffrey Epstein a Sweetheart Deal
Florida Justices Overturn Teen Murder Conviction on Self-Defense Theory
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readRFK Jr. Will Keep Affiliations With Morgan & Morgan, Other Law Firms If Confirmed to DHHS
3 minute readPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readLocal Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250