Florida Judge Unseals Documents in $60M Defamation Suit Over 'War Dogs' Movie
The judge ruled that the son of a former Albanian prime minister hadn't shown that an author maliciously linked him to corrupt arms dealings in a book that later inspired Hollywood movie "War Dogs."
March 19, 2019 at 02:23 PM
5 minute read
A newly unsealed court document is shedding new light on a $60 million lawsuit by the son of a former Albanian prime minister over the Hollywood movie “War Dogs,” starring Jonah Hill and Miles Teller.
U.S. District Judge Marcia G. Cooke in the Southern District of Florida Friday unsealed a December 2018 ruling dismissing a defamation case against author Guy Lawson, whose book inspired the movie. Other defendants included the book's publishers and former international arms dealers Alexander Podrizki and David Packouz.
The book, “Arms & The Dudes: How Three Stoners from Miami Beach Became the Most Unlikely Gunrunners in History,” tells the story of Packouz, Podrizki and Efraim Diveroli, who grew up in Florida and ended up at the helm of a global gunrunning enterprise.
Their story inspired the 2016 movie “War Dogs,” starring Hill and Teller as pot-smoking friends who won a $300 million contract to supply the Afghan Army with ammunition through their company AEY Inc.
But in the June 2017 complaint, plaintiff Shkelzen Berisha, son of former Albanian prime minister Sali Berisha, claimed the book slandered his name and incorrectly linked him to corrupt arms dealings involving Albanian mobsters — all in an effort to sell more books and movie tickets.
The suit asked for $60 million in damages, claiming Lawson's primary sources Podrizki and Packouz told tall tales about their exploits, including one about the “corrupt” prime minister's son depicting Berisha's meeting with Packouz and Podrizki to negotiate ammunition prices with mobsters.
Berisha claimed this never happened and that he had never associated with the Albanian mafia as the story claimed. He accused Lawson of “recklessly” steaming ahead without properly checking facts and sought an order forcing publishers Simon & Schuster Inc. and Recorded Books Inc. to remove all defamatory references from the book.
Berisha's Miami lawyer Jeffrey W. Gutchess deferred comment to co-counsel Jason M. Zoladz in Santa Monica, who did not respond to requests before deadline.
The defendants denied the allegations, standing by Lawson's research and stressing his book disclosed that its primary sources had admitted making false statements and forging documents in the past.
Packouz, Podrizki and Diveroli pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud the United States after the government found they had sold Albanian-made ammunition that had been repackaged, and shoddy Chinese weapons from the Cold War era. Diveroli received a four-year prison sentence, while Packouz and Podrizki were put under house arrest.
Click here to read the full complaint
Cooke dismissed the case in December 2018, but her ruling's contents remained unknown until Friday as the court had earlier deemed some of material confidential.
The parties later agreed to lift those confidentiality designations —revealing a ruling that found Berisha hadn't proved actual malice and hadn't shown the defendants held major doubts about their story or knew it was probably false.
According to the ruling, Albanian media has widely reported on Berisha's alleged attempt to corrupt arms deals and other schemes, involving an energy utility company and the country's lottery, but Berisha has never been charged.
Not all the press has been negative, the order said, as Berisha has received positive attention through his relationship with a former Miss World contestant.
As parties had labeled the suit a matter of public concern, Cooke considered whether the plaintiff was a public figure, as precedent says they “voluntarily expose themselves to increased risk of injury from defamatory falsehoods concerning them” and have greater ability to counteract claims via the media.
But Berisha, labeling himself a private citizen, argued he hadn't voluntarily exposed himself to the spotlight.
The court disagreed.
“For better or worse, plaintiff has attained a level of 'fame or notoriety in [his] community' that few other figures could likely match,” the order said. “Indeed, a survey produced by plaintiff shows that he has an astonishing 100 percent name recognition among Albanians.”
Defense counsel Elizabeth A. McNamara and John M. Browning of Davis Wright Tremaine in New York did not respond before deadline.
Adam Rothberg, a spokesman for defendant and book publisher Simon & Schuster, said he was pleased with the ruling.
“We are grateful that the court decided so decisively in favor of Guy Lawson and Simon & Schuster in this matter,” Rothberg said. ”We remain confident that it should be upheld by the appellate court.”
Read the full court order:
Read more:
Court Questions Seal in Jeffrey Epstein-Related Defamation Lawsuit
Media Company Fires Back at Ex-Trump Staffer's $100M Suit Over Stripper Abortion Report
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllU.S. Eleventh Circuit Remands Helms-Burton Trafficking Case Involving Confiscated Cuban Port
3 minute readMiami Lawyer Guilty of Indirect Criminal Contempt But Dodges Paying Legal Fees
4 minute readWinston & Strawn Snags Sidley Austin Cross-Border Transactions Partner in Miami
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250