UM Law Professor Sues ICE on Behalf of Immigrant Activist Featured in Documentary
Rebecca Sharpless is the director of UM's Immigration Clinic and is part of the legal team fighting on behalf of detained immigrant activist Claudio Rojas. She represents Rojas in a suit alleging ICE officials detained the immigrant in retaliation for his participation in a documentary about the department's detention policies.
March 20, 2019 at 02:34 PM
5 minute read
A federal lawsuit has accused the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement of abridging the constitutional rights and protections of a South Florida immigrant rights activist being threatened with deportation.
The suit by University of Miami School of Law professor Rebecca Sharpless, filed in the Southern District of Florida, accuses ICE of breaking the law by detaining Claudio Rojas, a Miramar resident and advocate for immigrants in the U.S.
ICE apprehended Rojas, who's resided in the U.S. since emigrating from Argentina in 2000, on Feb. 27 during a routine appointment with the immigration agency.
Sharpless, who serves as the director of UM's Immigration Clinic, alleges in the complaint that Rojas' apprehension was prompted by his high-profile activism. The filing singles out his participation in “The Infiltrators” — a 2019 documentary chronicling conditions at the Broward Transitional Center immigrant detention facility — as a reason ICE targeted him.
“Mr. Rojas's detention and imminent removal comes at a time when immigrant activists have become increasingly targeted for detention and deportation following high profile advocacy,” the complaint said. “Whistleblowers and journalists have uncovered reports of ICE and other immigration agencies keeping tabs and files on immigrant activists and peaceful gatherings.”
ICE spokesman Nestor Yglesias told the Daily Business Review the department “cannot comment on this case.”
Read the complaint:
According to Rojas' legal counsel, Miami attorney Sandy Pineda, he is slated to be deported around March 30.
“Right now Claudio's future is very unclear,” Pineda said. “The only answers we have received from ICE are that they can't really comment on the case, and they're investigating the pleading that we have filed.”
The plaintiff's emergency request for a temporary stay and release order are pending.
The filing notes Rojas has been detained before. “The Infiltrators” partly documents the seven months he spent at the Broward Transitional Center in 2012.
“During his detentions, Mr. Rojas organized detainees in peaceful demonstrations and shared information about abuses in detention with the National Immigrant Youth Alliance and other activist groups, hoping to spur changes in the immigration system,” the complaint said.
The suit also contends ICE has not legally justified Rojas' present detainment in light of his pending application for U.S. citizenship.
“To date, ICE has offered no other explanation of why it has summarily revoked Mr. Rojas's order of supervision and taken him into custody,” the complaint said. “Nor has ICE explained why it has denied Mr. Rojas's request for a stay of removal and is attempting to deport Mr. Rojas despite his pending T and U Visa Applications.”
Pineda and Sharpless have argued the emergency motion before Senior U.S. District Judge James L. King.
“ICE's power is not limitless,” Sharpless said in a statement on the litigation. “When ICE rushes to deport someone without following the law, courts must act. The stakes are just too high.”
The nine-count complaint accuses ICE of violating Rojas' due process protections by threatening him with deportation while he awaits his T and U visas.
“As physical presence in the United States is a condition of eligibility, [Rojas'] T Nonimmigrant status cannot be granted once he is removed,” according to the complaint. “Similarly, if Mr. Rojas is removed before his application for U visa status is adjudicated, or his removal case is reopened, he will be deprived of access to 'deferred action.' If granted 'deferred action,' Mr. Rojas will be allowed to remain and work in the country and await a U visa (along with other relief).”
The suit also charges ICE with undermining the First Amendment by retaliating against Rojas for his activism, in addition to violating the Fourth Amendment by arresting him without judicial probable cause.
Pineda said her client is being housed with approximately 120 other immigrant detainees in an 80-person capacity room at the Krome Detention Center in Miami. She noted Rojas has gotten sick since he was brought to Krome.
“To this day we're unsure if Claudio's seen a doctor,” Pineda said, adding he is being visited on Wednesday for a check on his well-being. She maintained ICE officials still “have not given any reason why they have detained him.”
She said, “It's a very terrible situation for the family.”
Related stories:
Somalis Alleging Abuses by ICE Personnel Seek More Time in US
Lawsuit Accuses Monroe Sheriff of Illegally Detaining US Citizen for ICE
$1M Bond Posted in Miami for Ecuadorian Brothers Accused of Embezzlement
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
6 minute readRFK Jr. Will Keep Affiliations With Morgan & Morgan, Other Law Firms If Confirmed to DHHS
3 minute readGreenberg Traurig Combines Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate Groups, Anticipating Uptick in Demand
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Law Firms Report Wide Growth, Successful Billing Rate Increases and Less Merger Interest
- 2CLOs Face Mounting Pressure as Risks Mushroom and Job Duties Expand
- 3X Faces Intense Scrutiny as EU Investigation Races to Conclusion & Looming Court Battle
- 4'Nation Is in Trouble': NY Lawmakers Advance Bill to Set Parameters for Shielding Juror IDs in Criminal Matters
- 5Margolis Edelstein Broadens Leadership With New Co-Managing Partner
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250