UM Law Professor Sues ICE on Behalf of Immigrant Activist Featured in Documentary
Rebecca Sharpless is the director of UM's Immigration Clinic and is part of the legal team fighting on behalf of detained immigrant activist Claudio Rojas. She represents Rojas in a suit alleging ICE officials detained the immigrant in retaliation for his participation in a documentary about the department's detention policies.
March 20, 2019 at 02:34 PM
5 minute read
A federal lawsuit has accused the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement of abridging the constitutional rights and protections of a South Florida immigrant rights activist being threatened with deportation.
The suit by University of Miami School of Law professor Rebecca Sharpless, filed in the Southern District of Florida, accuses ICE of breaking the law by detaining Claudio Rojas, a Miramar resident and advocate for immigrants in the U.S.
ICE apprehended Rojas, who's resided in the U.S. since emigrating from Argentina in 2000, on Feb. 27 during a routine appointment with the immigration agency.
Sharpless, who serves as the director of UM's Immigration Clinic, alleges in the complaint that Rojas' apprehension was prompted by his high-profile activism. The filing singles out his participation in “The Infiltrators” — a 2019 documentary chronicling conditions at the Broward Transitional Center immigrant detention facility — as a reason ICE targeted him.
“Mr. Rojas's detention and imminent removal comes at a time when immigrant activists have become increasingly targeted for detention and deportation following high profile advocacy,” the complaint said. “Whistleblowers and journalists have uncovered reports of ICE and other immigration agencies keeping tabs and files on immigrant activists and peaceful gatherings.”
ICE spokesman Nestor Yglesias told the Daily Business Review the department “cannot comment on this case.”
Read the complaint:
According to Rojas' legal counsel, Miami attorney Sandy Pineda, he is slated to be deported around March 30.
“Right now Claudio's future is very unclear,” Pineda said. “The only answers we have received from ICE are that they can't really comment on the case, and they're investigating the pleading that we have filed.”
The plaintiff's emergency request for a temporary stay and release order are pending.
The filing notes Rojas has been detained before. “The Infiltrators” partly documents the seven months he spent at the Broward Transitional Center in 2012.
“During his detentions, Mr. Rojas organized detainees in peaceful demonstrations and shared information about abuses in detention with the National Immigrant Youth Alliance and other activist groups, hoping to spur changes in the immigration system,” the complaint said.
The suit also contends ICE has not legally justified Rojas' present detainment in light of his pending application for U.S. citizenship.
“To date, ICE has offered no other explanation of why it has summarily revoked Mr. Rojas's order of supervision and taken him into custody,” the complaint said. “Nor has ICE explained why it has denied Mr. Rojas's request for a stay of removal and is attempting to deport Mr. Rojas despite his pending T and U Visa Applications.”
Pineda and Sharpless have argued the emergency motion before Senior U.S. District Judge James L. King.
“ICE's power is not limitless,” Sharpless said in a statement on the litigation. “When ICE rushes to deport someone without following the law, courts must act. The stakes are just too high.”
The nine-count complaint accuses ICE of violating Rojas' due process protections by threatening him with deportation while he awaits his T and U visas.
“As physical presence in the United States is a condition of eligibility, [Rojas'] T Nonimmigrant status cannot be granted once he is removed,” according to the complaint. “Similarly, if Mr. Rojas is removed before his application for U visa status is adjudicated, or his removal case is reopened, he will be deprived of access to 'deferred action.' If granted 'deferred action,' Mr. Rojas will be allowed to remain and work in the country and await a U visa (along with other relief).”
The suit also charges ICE with undermining the First Amendment by retaliating against Rojas for his activism, in addition to violating the Fourth Amendment by arresting him without judicial probable cause.
Pineda said her client is being housed with approximately 120 other immigrant detainees in an 80-person capacity room at the Krome Detention Center in Miami. She noted Rojas has gotten sick since he was brought to Krome.
“To this day we're unsure if Claudio's seen a doctor,” Pineda said, adding he is being visited on Wednesday for a check on his well-being. She maintained ICE officials still “have not given any reason why they have detained him.”
She said, “It's a very terrible situation for the family.”
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Lawyers Speak Out: 'The President Had the Confidence to Retain Me'
FTC Receiver Eyes Fraudulent Messages Ecommerce Company's Clients
'Rapidly Closing Window': Progressive Groups Urge Senate Votes on Biden's Judicial Nominees
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Why Kramer Levin Decided to Merge
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 3Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 4US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 5Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250