Senators Back Effort Making It Harder to Change Constitution
The Senate Ethics and Elections Committee voted 4-3 to approve a proposal, sponsored by committee Chairman Sen. Dennis Baxley, R-Ocala, that would require support from two-thirds of voters to pass constitutional amendments in the future.
March 21, 2019 at 12:44 PM
3 minute read
An effort to make it harder for voters to approve changes to the Florida Constitution advanced along party lines in the Senate.
The Senate Ethics and Elections Committee voted 4-3 to approve a proposal (SJR 232), sponsored by committee Chairman Sen. Dennis Baxley, R-Ocala, that would require support from two-thirds of voters to pass constitutional amendments in the future. Currently, constitutional amendments can pass with 60 percent of the vote.
Baxley's proposal to make it harder to change the Constitution is a reaction to numerous high-profile initiatives pushed by wealthy backers and to measures placed on the 2018 ballot by the state Constitution Revision Commission. Voters approved 11 ballot measures in November, including seven proposed by the CRC.
“Look at the things that we've had in there [in the Constitution], trains, pigs, you know the examples,” Baxley said. “It's gone to the point that it's truly diluting the very purpose of a Constitution, to use it as a policy tool.”
But Sen. Bobby Powell, a West Palm Beach Democrat who voted against the proposal, asked if the rules should be changed any time lawmakers disagree with the outcome of a vote.
“Sixty percent to me is a huge majority,” Powell said.
An identical proposal to make it harder to pass amendments (HJR 57), sponsored by Rep. Rick Roth, R-Loxahatchee, has not been heard in the House.
Even if the proposals do not pass the Legislature, a political committee called Keep Our Constitution Clean PC filed paperwork last week at the state Division of Elections as an initial step toward trying to get the issue on the 2020 ballot.
Like Baxley and Roth, the committee wants to create a two-thirds threshold for passing future ballot measures. Voters would have to approve increasing the threshold because the current 60 percent requirement is in the Constitution.
While lawmakers could put a measure on the 2020 ballot, the political committee would need to submit 766,000 petition signatures to take its proposal to voters.
Since voters approved the 60 percent threshold in 2006, the success rate of proposed constitutional amendments has been 61 percent.
Of the 27 amendments approved over that time, 15 have come in the past two general-election cycles, which a Senate staff analysis said “suggests a possible recent trend toward easier voter approval.”
But requiring two-thirds approval could have prevented passage of some of the amendments.
As an example, only four amendments on the 2018 ballot — measures to end greyhound racing, prohibit oil drilling and vaping, strengthen lobbying restrictions and make it harder to expand gambling — would have passed with the two-thirds requirement.
Several high-profile amendments have been proposed by political committees for the 2020 ballot. Those proposals deal with issues such as increasing the minimum wage, overhauling the electric utility industry and banning assault-style weapons.
Jim Turner reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readBrazil Is Quickly Becoming a Vital LatAm Market for Greenberg Traurig, Other US Law Firms
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Prior Inconsistent Statements and Medical Malpractice Defense
- 2Public Interest Calendar of Events
- 3Why Law Firms Should Focus on IA for Improved Gen AI
- 4Post-Pandemic Increase in Live Events Prompts Need for Premise Liability Action
- 5Companies' Dirty Little Secret: Those Privacy Opt-Out Requests Usually Aren't Honored
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250