Florida Wrestles Over Felon Voting Rights Restoration
Although Florida voters overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment to restore voting rights for most felons, some haven't registered because they aren't sure if they are eligible.
March 26, 2019 at 12:50 PM
4 minute read
Karen Leicht is a convicted felon from Miami and a self-described “cat lady” who wants to vote.
Although Florida voters overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment to restore voting rights for most felons, she told a Senate committee Monday that she hasn't registered because she wasn't sure if she was eligible. She completed a 30-month prison sentence and three months' probation for a conviction of insurance fraud she said she was unwittingly caught up in.
“It was my complete and total understanding that at that point … I was free. I now have a passport; I was able to travel to Italy to my son's wedding this last year — so exciting! I'm like a citizen again, except for I still can't vote,” she said. “I need to make sure that when I go and register to vote that I am not going to commit another crime, because I'm not going back inside. I was there once; I will not be going back again. I work full time, I'm a caregiver for my mother, I'm a cat lady and I pay my restitution to this day every month.”
That restitution totals $59 million. And that's the problem. She'll never pay it off.
Her story is part of the debate lawmakers are wrestling with as they try to decide the definition of completing a felony sentence. The Senate Criminal Justice Committee approved a bill after hearing Leicht's testimony that makes paying restitution a requirement to be able to register to vote. But even though Leicht will never pay back the ordered restitution, two senators — a Republican and a Democrat — told her to register to vote while lawmakers sort out the issues. The constitutional amendment says felons who complete their sentence and who didn't commit murder or a felon sex crime can now vote.
“Go register to vote,” said Democratic Sen. Jason Pizzo. “This is subject to interpretation; there is some confusion. You're not intentionally committing a bad act.”
He told her the state attorney in Miami has already said she won't prosecute felons who register to vote if they do so believing they aren't breaking the law.
“Oh my God! I'm shaking! That's so incredible! Thank you so much!” a clearly elated Leicht said. In a rarity in legislative meetings, many in the crowd burst into applause.
Even Republican committee Chairman Sen. Keith Perry said she should register to vote, even though his interpretation of the amendment language is that she shouldn't be allowed to do so. He called himself a supporter of felon voting rights restoration but said the language advocates put into the amendment means all court-ordered penalties, including financial obligations, need to be fulfilled.
“If you need to go register to vote, go register to vote. I would encourage you to do that,” he said. “As a citizen, you didn't swear an oath to uphold the constitution. I did, so I take it very seriously.”
He added that he doesn't want to put up roadblocks preventing registration and the bill could change going forward.
After the meeting, Leicht cautiously said she would register based on what was said in the committee meeting.
“If he didn't say it on record, I'd still be afraid,” she said. “I do not want to reoffend.”
Brendan Farrington reports for the Associated Press.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250