Controversial School 'Guardian' Expansion Gets Approval in Senate
After emotional testimony and debate that lasted nearly two hours, the Senate Infrastructure and Security Committee approved the proposal with added language that would make it a third-degree felony to impersonate a school guardian.
March 27, 2019 at 12:21 PM
3 minute read
A Senate proposal that would boost school safety and expand a controversial school “guardian” program moved forward despite continued backlash from teachers and students.
Alyson Sheehy, a graduate of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, was among the many speakers who opposed the proposal. In tears, she revisited her firsthand experience from the mass shooting in February 2018 at her school and pleaded with lawmakers to not expand the “guardian” program to allow armed teachers.
She also referred to the suicides this month of a 2018 Marjory Stoneman Douglas graduate and a current student at the school.
“Now we're here, over a year since the worst day of my life. As of last week, two more students — friends — died. … Teachers' focus should be on education, the job they signed up for,” Sheehy said.
After emotional testimony and debate that lasted nearly two hours, the Senate Infrastructure and Security Committee approved the proposal (SB 7030) with added language that would make it a third-degree felony to impersonate a school guardian.
Lawmakers rushed last year to pass a major school-safety bill after a gunman killed 17 students and faculty members at Marjory Stoneman Douglas on Valentine's Day. While the bill was wide-ranging, the issue of arming school employees drew heavy debate.
In the end, lawmakers allowed trained school employees whose primary duties are outside the classroom to be armed guardians. Fewer than half of the state's school districts have decided to use such guardians, but Senate and House Republicans want to expand the program to also allow trained teachers to be armed.
The 5-3 vote Tuesday in the Senate committee, which was along party lines, came after the panel rejected proposals from Democrats, including one by Sen Annette Taddeo, D-Miami, that would have allowed parents to pull their children from classrooms with armed teachers.
Lawmakers also mulled ways to identify school guardians. Some of the informal options ranged from having guardians wear yellow T-shirts to ensuring their identities are not publicly shared. Sen. Aaron Bean, R-Fernandina Beach, suggested putting up signs in front of schools stating they participate in the guardian program.
While most of the focus has been on the guardian program, the proposal would bring a variety of changes to school safety measures.
That would include changes to a multiagency network that provides at-risk children better access to mental-illness and behavioral programs. The bill would also create a “behavioral threat assessment instrument” and database that all public schools may use. It would address potential threats and students' “evaluation, early intervention, and student support.”
The Senate bill still needs approval from the Appropriations Committee before it could reach the Senate floor. Also, a Senate budget proposal would allow an unused $57 million from the “guardian” program this year to be used to train and arm guardians for the upcoming 2019-2020 fiscal year.
The House Appropriations Committee considered its version of the school safety bill (HB 7093) on Wednesday, the bill's last stop before it can go to the full House.
Ana Ceballos reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
St. Thomas University Settles With Fired Professor Who Had Alleged Academic Freedom Violations and Discrimination
9 minute readEx-St. Thomas Univ. Law Professor Sues School Over Firing, Alleging Defamation
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250