Federal Judge Issues Order Protecting NFL Players' Concussion Funds in Bankruptcy Proceedings
The ruling by Judge Kathleen Williams defines monetary awards from the NFL's concussion litigation litigation settlement as disability benefits, exempting the funds from seizure in Chapter 7 bankruptcy cases.
March 27, 2019 at 04:16 PM
3 minute read
A new ruling in the Southern District of Florida has set a precedent for the legal classification of monetary awards in the National Football League's concussion litigation settlement.
On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams issued an order affirming a bankruptcy court's finding that funds from the NFL's settlement with players who sustained chronic traumatic encephalopathy injuries qualify as disability benefits.
The case, Salkin v. Williams, reached the federal court following an appeal from attorney Mark Bonacquisti, who represented the trustee looking to seize settlement money from former NFL player Darryl Williams.
Miami-born Williams had played for the Cincinnati Bengals as well as the Seattle Seahawks before retiring in 2001 after 10 seasons. When he filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in May 2016, he sought to keep his CTE-related funds exempt from seizures.
“The crux of appellant's argument on appeal is that the failure of the NFL settlement to include the magic phrase 'disability policy' renders [U.S. Bankruptcy Court] Judge Olson's reasoned decision overruling the trustee's objection 'extreme,' 'remarkable' and clearly erroneous,” the judge wrote in her summary.
But in the issue of first impression, the judge found the settlement is designed to provide financial relief to NFL players suffering from “qualified neuro-cognitive disabilities.” Because recipients of the settlement “must qualify and submit to authorized medical testing from authorized providers,” and any monetary award is subject to the severity of a player's condition, she concluded “the settlement only functions as a disability policy.”
Fort Lauderdale lawyer Chad Van Horn represented Williams in the bankruptcy proceedings. The attorney said the crux of their argument was that money from the concussion settlement was no different from other disability claims, meaning it'd be exempt property under Florida bankruptcy law.
“The underlying principle is that we want to take care of people when they're sick,” Van Horn said. “Once you experience CTE your health can decline rapidly, and you'll need that money for your health care.”
Read the order:
As noted in Tuesday's order, the trustee sought Williams' CTE-related money by characterizing the award as a tort settlement. Bonacquisti, an attorney with the Plantation-based Salkin Law Firm, said ”the trustee has no comment on the ruling at this time” in an email to the Daily Business Review.
According to the ruling, “The question of classification of such a settlement … has not been addressed by the Eleventh Circuit, or upon an extensive search, by any other federal court.” Van Horn and his legal team reached the same conclusion.
“To my knowledge this is the first opinion on the matter,” he said. “This is going to have a large impact on people, because there's so many NFL players who've had CTE claims … not only will [the ruling] benefit my client, we're hopeful this will stand as precedent that anybody who has these injuries will be able to keep that money for a future case.”
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250