Crocker Says Boca Raton Broke Sunshine Law to Block Midtown Housing
A lawsuit claims city council members broke the state sunshine law by privately communicating to exclude housing from a redevelopment zone.
March 29, 2019 at 03:42 PM
4 minute read
Developer Crocker Partners LLC, which has been fighting Boca Raton for stonewalling its proposed development in Midtown Boca, accused city council members of secretly making decisions framing the project in violation of the state sunshine law.
Two or more council members communicated with each other with the help of a city staff member or another intermediary when deciding what to do next and how to vote on Midtown, according to a Palm Beach Circuit Court complaint.
The goal was to block any zoning or land development regulation that would allow a residential component in the district, according to the lawsuit filed Wednesday.
Florida law requires elected officials make all decisions at public meetings after a proper public notice. Direct and indirect communication between elected officials is prohibited outside public meetings.
“We believe that at a minimum more than one city council member was aware that the city attorney was shuttling information among the council people with some of their consent and knowledge and some without in violation of the sunshine laws,” said Angelo Bianco, Crocker managing partner.
This is Crocker's third lawsuit against the city over its planned development in the 300-acre Midtown district southwest of Interstate 95 and Glades Road. The company invested in three properties totaling 63.7 acres.
Crocker bought in only because the city in 2010 made Midtown a planned mobility district, a designation that incorporates housing, Bianco said.
Crocker doesn't specify who allegedly broke the government-in-the-sunshine law.
In response, the city didn't address specifics of the allegations, saying only that it hasn't been served.
“If and when the city is served with the lawsuit, we will review it and prepare an appropriate and timely response,” spokeswoman Chrissy Gibson said in an email Friday.
Mayor Scott Singer and council members didn't return requests for comment by deadline.
The issue dates back to a meeting on Jan. 23, 2018, when the council unanimously voted to indefinitely postpone adoption of regulations for Midtown residences and voted 4-1 to instead create a small-area plan with workshop input from residents, according to meeting minutes.
A city consultant and planning director Brandon Schaad held the first workshop May 23, 2018, and drafted a summary of public input calling for only low- to mid-density residential construction, according to the complaint.
Crocker claims some council members secretly communicated with each other and agreed to direct Deputy City Manager George Brown to edit Schaad's summary to delete any reference to the public wanting residences in Midtown.
The original memo read, “The preponderance of concepts from the public visioning session included residential uses at a suitable low to mid density and height.” A revised version noted discussion about residential development, and added, “There was also opposition to residential development at any density.”
The consultant recommended residential development at a council meeting on Aug. 20, 2018. The council directed staff on Oct. 9, 2018, to move forward with a second workshop.
Instead, the city attorney wrote a memo about five weeks later saying the council decided to end the workshop exercise, and the consultant was dismissed, according to the complaint.
“Obviously, there were secret, nonpublic communications among council members and others that led to the city attorney's memorandum,” the lawsuit said.
The complaint alleged more secret council communications before a Jan. 8 meeting when development regulations were approved for Midtown without housing.
Crocker's Midtown assets are an office buildings and a 256-room Marriott hotel at 5150 Town Center; the 11-story One Town Center office building at 1 Town Center Rd., and vacant land; and the 10-story Plaza office building at 5355 Town Center Rd.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1The Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Push Into Law Firms
- 2Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 3'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 4Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 5Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250