Law Firm Lifers and the Hot Lateral Market
Today's attorneys have no qualms about jumping from firm to firm on a whim. So why have some lawyers remained with one firm their entire career?
April 02, 2019 at 03:57 PM
6 minute read
|
In today's hot lateral legal market, attorneys who have spent their entire career at one law firm are no longer the norm.
There were nearly 9,000 lateral partner moves within the Am Law 200 in the five-year-span from 2014 through 2018, bringing an estimated $17.1 billion in total business with them. For perspective, revenue at Am Law 200 firms grew by $16.9 billion over that same time frame.
Amid the madness, attorneys who stay with one firm for their entire career can still be found. The Daily Business Review spoke to these law firm “lifers,” asking them why they stayed and what they think of today's lateral market. Although all work at different firms, they gave similar answers, citing loyalty, strong mentorship and personal and professional fulfillment.
Steven Weinstein — Managing Partner of K&L Gates' Miami Office — 26 years at the firm (since 1993)
Weinstein has a simple answer for why he has been with K&L Gates for almost 30 years:
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
“I never really made a conscious decision to stay,” he said. “I always try to appreciate the good I have.”
He relishes stability, he said, and the work-life balance K&L Gates allowed him. Weinstein said he was “exceptionally” involved in his twin son's activities; he even coached their sports teams, and he genuinely enjoys coming into work each day — a sentiment shared by other lifers.
Weinstein said mentorship also played a huge factor, rattling off the names of important mentors he had in his legal career and K&L Gates attorneys who helped him develop into a leader at the firm, including former K&L partners Dan Casey, Gregg Breitbart and Dennis Nowak.
As for why today's lateral market is so hot, Weinstein has a few guesses but no definitive theories. One possible reason is generational, he said. From his personal experience with his sons, young attorneys have a different attitude about what satisfies them professionally. It's not just about money anymore.
But competition, especially in Miami, has gotten stiffer as big law firms have come pouring into the Sunshine State. Since 2003, the number of Am Law 200 firms with a Florida presence has nearly doubled.
With big law competition comes big guarantees on salaries and big titles, Weinstein said.
“If it's primarily a monetary decision, I can see why some people might leave,” he said.
Jennifer Olmedo-Rodriguez — Managing Partner of Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney's Miami Office — 16 years at the firm (since 2003)
Olmedo-Rodriguez said that at her core, she's a loyal person: She has had the same hairdresser since she was 9 years old.
But loyalty is earned, and Buchanan has surely earned hers, she said.
Not only did they allow her to defer her job offer so she could take a judicial clerkship, they kept the offer on the table even as the events of Sept. 11 led to her law school colleagues having their job offers revoked. When she started, the firm got her immediately involved, bringing her to hearings and depositions instead of “locking her in a back room to bill hours.”
And, when she left for three years to take care of her first child — working from home in the interim doing regulatory work in Spanish — the firm welcomed her back “with open arms.”
“They put me back into my class year, kept me on that track,” she said. “Even the code to get into the office and my computer was the same. … It was like I never left.”
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readMorgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
6 minute readLost in the Legal Maze: How State Regulations Are Hindering Hemp Operators' Success
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250