Ex-General Counsel Claims Employer Fired Her for Blowing Whistle on Violations
In a Broward Circuit Court lawsuit, attorney Kimarie Stratos claims she was fired as general counsel to Memorial Healthcare System in 2018 because she'd called out legal violations.
April 03, 2019 at 02:57 PM
4 minute read
Stephen Zack and Debra Goodstone of Boies Schiller Flexner represent former general counsel to South Broward Hospital District Kimarie Stratos, who has sued over her 2018 firing — a move she claims was made after she tried to stop the district from violating Florida's Sunshine Law, wasting public money and releasing patients' confidential medical information.
The district, commonly known as Memorial Healthcare System, includes Memorial Regional Hospital in Hollywood, Memorial Hospital Pembroke and Memorial Hospital Miramar, and has more than 266 doctors.
Stratos was hired as vice president and general counsel in 2010 and fired in 2018, according to the lawsuit, which alleges the district violated Florida's Whistle-blower's Act, and accuses board members Douglas Harrison and Laura Miller of tortious interference.
The way Stratos tells it, she consistently faced ”resistance and outright refusal” when advising her department on how to comply with state and federal law, including Florida's Sunshine Law — a group of legislation aimed at promoting government transparency by mandating open meetings and public access to records in certain instances.
Stratos' complaint accuses Harrison of physical intimidation as he allegedly told her that “she worked for him and that he would do as he pleased.” According to the complaint, that came after Stratos had pulled Harrison aside for a conversation about Sunshine Law violations at an open board meeting.
The lawsuit, filed in Broward Circuit Court, alleges Miller also disregarded legal advice aimed at adhering to Sunshine Law and other other rules. It claims Miller also tried to use public funds to pay $70,000 in personal legal fees and threatened Stratos with retaliation if she didn't approve the payment.
Defendants Harrison and Miller did not respond to requests for comment. Fort Lauderdale attorney Michael R. Piper,who represents them and the district, said the allegations are “absolutely false.”
“No. 1, there were no violations of Sunshine Law, and No. 2, Kim Stratos never reported any,” Piper said. “It is interesting to note, I think, that Kim Stratos was terminated following two public meetings in September of 2018, but we're only now hearing about this.”
In Piper's view, the lawsuit was aimed at harnessing media attention in the plaintiff's favor.
“This is a media-driven event, not a legally substantive event,” Piper said. “From initial evaluation of the complaint, not only do [Stratos'] allegations themselves come up short, but proof is going to come up way short.”
Piper said it's business as usual at the district.
“They take it very seriously, but they're not going to be disrupted in any way by this,” Piper said. “In fact, that's why they've hired my firm.”
According to the complaint, those public meetings were retaliatory evaluations of Stratos, “designed to punish, retaliate, demean and terminate” her despite positive performance reviews.
Stratos' attorneys, Zack and Goodstone, declined an interview but said via email, “Kimarie spent years attempting to address the violations within the system and then months attempting to address these issues, post-termination, without filing suit, but it became clear that the district was unwilling to right its wrongs voluntarily, so Kimarie was compelled to file.”
They also pointed to a statement from their client that said, ”While I know being a plaintiff in this type of lawsuit will be difficult, it is my hope that this lawsuit will prevent certain commissioners from continuing to abuse their power. I also hope that this lawsuit will empower others to do the right thing and speak out against wrongdoing.”
The lawsuit seeks damages and interest, while the defense plans to move for dismissal.
|Read the full complaint:
|Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readDisbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250